Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SACentral European journal of urology

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on YouTube: Valuable educational resource for urologists and patients or misleading information?

1 more authors
5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Italy.
  2. 2IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
  3. 3Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
  4. 4Department of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  5. 5UOC Urologia, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the quality, reliability, and educational value of YouTube videos related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), with a specific focus on the content available for urologists and patients seeking information online.Material and methods

A systematic YouTube search using the key words "PCNL" and "percutaneous nephrolithotomy" was conducted. Videos were included if they were in English, had audio, and were relevant to PCNL. Two expert urologists independently evaluated each video. Collected data included upload year, video length, content type, target audience, source, geographic origin, and surgical position. The quality of the videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and Global Quality Score (GQS).Results

Of 65 identified videos, 26 met inclusion criteria. Most were aimed at healthcare professionals (84.6%) and were uploaded by physicians (65.4%). Only 15.4% were patient-oriented. The prone position was depicted in 84.6% of videos. The median duration was 7 minutes 58 seconds. The median view ratio was 102.3 views/day. The median DISCERN score was 2 (IQR 1), and the median GQS score was 3 (IQR 1.375), reflecting moderate educational quality.Conclusions

YouTube contains a moderate-quality body of PCNL videos primarily designed for professional audiences. There is a clear shortage of reliable, patient-centered educational content. Healthcare organizations and scientific societies should proactively develop and promote accessible, high-quality educational resources for patients.

Related

  1. Editorial comment: Craniocaudal bull's eye technique for superior calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Determination of angle, efficacy, and outcomes.
    Gyanendra R Sharma, Pankaj N Maheshwari
    Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Miniaturized Versus Standard-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Calculi Larger Than 2 cm: Tract Caliber Determines Hemorrhagic Morbidity Without Compromising Stone Clearance
    Sajad A Malik, Omar Mukhtar, Yawar Nazir +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Ultrasonic-With-Ballistic Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 2-4 cm Renal Calculi: A Prospective Quasi-experimental Comparative Study in a Bangladeshi Tertiary-Care Hospital
    Md. Mahmudul Hasan, Md. Mezbahul Moker Rabin, Mohammad Alomgir +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Gentamicin-Augmented Intrarenal Irrigation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Reduces 30-Day Infectious Complications and Eliminates Pyelonephritis and Sepsis: A 1:2 Matched Cohort Study
    P. Jiang, K. Madamba, J. Badin-Castro +9
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  5. Simultaneous single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy and intrarenal laser marsupialization via non-cyst-transgressing access: A pilot case series.
    Huy-Hoang Nguyen, Ngoc-Son Do, Van-Hung Le
    Central European journal of urologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mantica2026percutaneous,
  title = {{Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on YouTube: Valuable educational resource for urologists and patients or misleading information?}},
  author = {Guglielmo Mantica and Giovanni Drocchi and Rafaela Malinaric and Federica Balzarini and Valentina Catale and Pieter Spies and André Van der Merwe and Daniele Panarello and Francesco Chierigo and Federico Dotta and Matteo Ferro and Carlo Introini and Carlo Terrone},
  journal = {Central European journal of urology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.5173/ceju.2025.0240},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903610},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on YouTube: Valuable educational resource for urologists and patients or misleading information?
AU  - Guglielmo Mantica
AU  - Giovanni Drocchi
AU  - Rafaela Malinaric
AU  - Federica Balzarini
AU  - Valentina Catale
AU  - Pieter Spies
AU  - André Van der Merwe
AU  - Daniele Panarello
AU  - Francesco Chierigo
AU  - Federico Dotta
AU  - Matteo Ferro
AU  - Carlo Introini
AU  - Carlo Terrone
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/07
JO  - Central European journal of urology
DO  - 10.5173/ceju.2025.0240
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903610
AB  - Introduction  To evaluate the quality, reliability, and educational value of YouTube videos related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), with a specific focus on the content available for urologists and patients seeking information online.Material and methods  A systematic YouTube search using the key words "PCNL" and "percutaneous nephrolithotomy" was conducted. Videos were included if they were in English, had audio, and were relevant to PCNL. Two expert urologists independently evaluated each video. Collected data included upload year, video length, content type, target audience, source, geographic origin, and surgical position. The quality of the videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and Global Quality Score (GQS).Results  Of 65 identified videos, 26 met inclusion criteria. Most were aimed at healthcare professionals (84.6%) and were uploaded by physicians (65.4%). Only 15.4% were patient-oriented. The prone position was depicted in 84.6% of videos. The median duration was 7 minutes 58 seconds. The median view ratio was 102.3 views/day. The median DISCERN score was 2 (IQR 1), and the median GQS score was 3 (IQR 1.375), reflecting moderate educational quality.Conclusions  YouTube contains a moderate-quality body of PCNL videos primarily designed for professional audiences. There is a clear shortage of reliable, patient-centered educational content. Healthcare organizations and scientific societies should proactively develop and promote accessible, high-quality educational resources for patients.
SN  - 2080-4806
SN  - 2080-4873
ER  -