Leveraging hologenomic data for phenotypic prediction: potential and pitfalls
Abstract
The microbiota is increasingly recognized as an active component of host biology, influencing various host phenotypes. Advances in high-throughput sequencing and the emergence of the holobiont perspective have raised expectations regarding hologenomic-informed prediction. Yet, whether and under which conditions integrating microbiota and genomic data meaningfully improves phenotypic prediction remains unclear. The biological characteristics of the microbiota, including but not limited to transmission mechanisms, environmental effects and interactions with host genetics, complicate their integration into classical evaluation frameworks. In addition, microbiota datasets are high-dimensional, highly dispersed, sparse and compositional. Finally, analytical choices such as the taxonomic granularity considered for aggregation or the similarity matrix used in prediction models may impact downstream inference and prediction accuracy. Here we explore these challenges using a comprehensive set of transgenerational hologenomic simulations. By generating controlled and contrasted biological scenarios across a broad parameter space, we examine how microbiota granularity, variance structure and host modulation influence (i) the estimation of variance components and (ii) the accuracy of phenotypic prediction. We show that the added value of hologenomic, compared to genomic prediction, is highly context dependent. Our results provide a structured framework to interrogate when and how integrating microbiota may enhance phenotypic prediction in breeding applications.
Related
- Multi-source conformal prediction: leveraging heterogeneity via localization
- Multivariate conformal uncertainty propagation in multitask atomistic simulation: Successes and pitfalls
- When Concealed Links Cannot Be Recovered: A Structural Identifiability Bound and Evaluation Pitfalls in Offshore Leak Networks
- Co-sufficient weighting: leveraging sparsity for more powerful variable selection in the linear model
- Leveraging Large Language Models to Improve Precision in Randomized Controlled Trials
BibTeX
@misc{pety2026leveraging,
title = {{Leveraging hologenomic data for phenotypic prediction: potential and pitfalls}},
author = {Solène Pety and Ingrid David and Andrea Rau and Mahendra Mariadassou},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.15565},
eprint = {2609.15565},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15565},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Leveraging hologenomic data for phenotypic prediction: potential and pitfalls
AU - Sol{è}ne Pety
AU - Ingrid David
AU - Andrea Rau
AU - Mahendra Mariadassou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.15565
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15565
AB - The microbiota is increasingly recognized as an active component of host biology, influencing various host phenotypes. Advances in high-throughput sequencing and the emergence of the holobiont perspective have raised expectations regarding hologenomic-informed prediction. Yet, whether and under which conditions integrating microbiota and genomic data meaningfully improves phenotypic prediction remains unclear. The biological characteristics of the microbiota, including but not limited to transmission mechanisms, environmental effects and interactions with host genetics, complicate their integration into classical evaluation frameworks. In addition, microbiota datasets are high-dimensional, highly dispersed, sparse and compositional. Finally, analytical choices such as the taxonomic granularity considered for aggregation or the similarity matrix used in prediction models may impact downstream inference and prediction accuracy. Here we explore these challenges using a comprehensive set of transgenerational hologenomic simulations. By generating controlled and contrasted biological scenarios across a broad parameter space, we examine how microbiota granularity, variance structure and host modulation influence (i) the estimation of variance components and (ii) the accuracy of phenotypic prediction. We show that the added value of hologenomic, compared to genomic prediction, is highly context dependent. Our results provide a structured framework to interrogate when and how integrating microbiota may enhance phenotypic prediction in breeding applications.
ER -