Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
193,349 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

From Nowcasting to Forecasting: Adapting a Reanalysis-Trained

Abstract

Accurate cloud-cover forecasts are important for temperature prediction, radiation forecasting, and solar-power operations. Short-range forecasting methods can preserve observed cloud placement during the first forecast hours, but their skill decreases when cloud fields evolve through formation, dissipation and deformation. Longer lead times require accounting for atmospheric evolution, but operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) forecasts may not accurately represent the satellite-observed cloud state at initialization. We develop CloudCast v2, a machine-learning model for 12-hour cloud-cover forecasting from observation-based initial conditions. The model is first trained on the Copernicus European Regional Reanalysis (Ridal2024) to learn cloud-evolution dynamics, and is then adapted to satellite-derived cloud fields using conditional flow matching (Lipman2023), a generative method that transforms noise into cloud-cover forecasts conditioned on the observed initial cloud fields and NWP inputs. CloudCast v2 reduces mean absolute error by 10% relative to its predecessor, CloudCast v1 (Partio2025), over the 1-12 h range. It also overtakes CloudCast v1 in fractions skill score, a neighborhood-based measure of spatial agreement, after approximately 3-6 h, depending on the cloudiness category. These results show that observation-initialized machine-learning forecasts can extend beyond the usual 1-3-hour nowcasting range while retaining spatial detail from satellite cloud fields.

Related

  1. Precipitation nowcasting model based on multi-source data fusion and efficient additive attention
    Yunan Qiu, Bingjian Lu, Chunfeng Duan +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  2. Diffusion-Based Refinement for Kilometer-Scale Probabilistic Precipitation Nowcasting
    Dohyun Park, Changhoon Song, Tengyuan Chang +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  3. Wet-Biased Data Pipelines Mislead the Training and Evaluation of Generative Precipitation Nowcasting
    Christoph Metzl, Stefan Kapsreiter, Kianusch Vahid Yousefnia +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  4. Meteorology-driven Causal Nowcasting of Fugitive Landfill Emissions from Measured Coupling Timescales
    Timothy C. Pearce, David J. T. Smith, Alec Dobney +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  5. GenONet: A Generative operator Network for High-Resolution Precipitation Nowcasting
    Mohammad Kian Golkar, Luciano Alves de Oliveira, Mohammad Khanjani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{partio2026from,
  title = {{From Nowcasting to Forecasting: Adapting a Reanalysis-Trained}},
  author = {Mikko Partio and Leila Hieta and Ossi Laine},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03763},
  eprint = {2609.03763},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03763},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From Nowcasting to Forecasting: Adapting a Reanalysis-Trained
AU  - Mikko Partio
AU  - Leila Hieta
AU  - Ossi Laine
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03763
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03763
AB  - Accurate cloud-cover forecasts are important for temperature prediction, radiation forecasting, and solar-power operations. Short-range forecasting methods can preserve observed cloud placement during the first forecast hours, but their skill decreases when cloud fields evolve through formation, dissipation and deformation. Longer lead times require accounting for atmospheric evolution, but operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) forecasts may not accurately represent the satellite-observed cloud state at initialization. We develop CloudCast v2, a machine-learning model for 12-hour cloud-cover forecasting from observation-based initial conditions. The model is first trained on the Copernicus European Regional Reanalysis (Ridal2024) to learn cloud-evolution dynamics, and is then adapted to satellite-derived cloud fields using conditional flow matching (Lipman2023), a generative method that transforms noise into cloud-cover forecasts conditioned on the observed initial cloud fields and NWP inputs. CloudCast v2 reduces mean absolute error by 10% relative to its predecessor, CloudCast v1 (Partio2025), over the 1-12 h range. It also overtakes CloudCast v1 in fractions skill score, a neighborhood-based measure of spatial agreement, after approximately 3-6 h, depending on the cloudiness category. These results show that observation-initialized machine-learning forecasts can extend beyond the usual 1-3-hour nowcasting range while retaining spatial detail from satellite cloud fields.
ER  -