Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning

  1. 1Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Abstract

Motor learning depends on the integration of several, often competing signals, including reward and punishment (which guide learning the value of actions via reinforcement learning) and sensorimotor errors (which refine the execution of actions via motor adaptation). If and how these signals interact remains controversial. Here we show that the learned value of actions can fundamentally alter how the motor adaptation system learns from errors. Human participants learned the reward values of different movement targets and subsequently underwent implicit motor learning at those targets. Across several experiments, motor learning was robustly attenuated when it brought the limb toward previously punished movement directions. Moreover, learning was globally suppressed when punished targets were themselves the movement goal. Learning was not reciprocally enhanced when it pushed movements toward previously rewarded directions, revealing a valence asymmetry. Using computational modeling, we present a novel mechanism to explain our effects: the motor adaptation system tunes its error sensitivity according to a movement-specific value gradient. Our findings point to a close interaction between reinforcement learning and motor memory -- a kind of "instrumental-motor transfer" -- where learned action values modulate error-based motor adaptation.

Related

  1. GamPIT: Examining the Influence of Gambling-Related Cues on Instrumental Behaviour Using Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer
    Anthony Brennan, Jamie Torrance, Camilla Nord +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. Directed forgetting and working-memory load reduce outcome-selective Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in humans
    Ulkar Huseynzade, David Dignath, Andreas B. Eder
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  3. Enhanced Alcohol-Specific but not General Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in Alcohol Use Disorder
    H. Chen, C. Baeuchl, L. Thill +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Reduced Control Over Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in Human Addiction: A Systematic Investigation Across Alcohol Use Disorder and Smoking Status
    L. Thill, H. Chen, C. Bäuchl +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Mechanical load modulates premovement cortical activity during voluntary upper limb movement
    Vijesh Bhagat, Rohit Kumar Yadav, Sutirtha Ghosh +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{alfawakhiri2026instrumentalmotor,
  title = {{Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning}},
  author = {N. Al-Fawakhiri and V. S. Chib and S. D. McDougle},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.06.22.733849},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.22.733849v3},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning
AU  - N. Al-Fawakhiri
AU  - V. S. Chib
AU  - S. D. McDougle
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/22
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.06.22.733849
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.22.733849v3
AB  - Motor learning depends on the integration of several, often competing signals, including reward and punishment (which guide learning the value of actions via reinforcement learning) and sensorimotor errors (which refine the execution of actions via motor adaptation). If and how these signals interact remains controversial. Here we show that the learned value of actions can fundamentally alter how the motor adaptation system learns from errors. Human participants learned the reward values of different movement targets and subsequently underwent implicit motor learning at those targets. Across several experiments, motor learning was robustly attenuated when it brought the limb toward previously punished movement directions. Moreover, learning was globally suppressed when punished targets were themselves the movement goal. Learning was not reciprocally enhanced when it pushed movements toward previously rewarded directions, revealing a valence asymmetry. Using computational modeling, we present a novel mechanism to explain our effects: the motor adaptation system tunes its error sensitivity according to a movement-specific value gradient. Our findings point to a close interaction between reinforcement learning and motor memory -- a kind of "instrumental-motor transfer" -- where learned action values modulate error-based motor adaptation.
ER  -