Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Smooth Concordance Metrics for Survival Models

Abstract

Concordance indices are widely popular metrics for assessing the ability of predictive survival models to discriminate underlying risk levels. However, these statistics have also been criticized for using only the rank orderings of the model's predicted risk scores and being insensitive to important model features, such as the addition of strong predictor variables into the model. In this paper, we address these limitations by developing smooth concordance metrics that model the underlying risk discrimination probabilities as continuous functions of the predicted risk score differences, where the shapes of these functions are estimated from the observed data. As a result, these smooth concordance metrics assess model performance across the entire range of possible risk score differences, allowing one to identify specific scenarios where the candidate model performs especially well or better than other models. Simulations show that the proposed smooth concordance metrics provide more detailed information about risk discrimination performance and are much more sensitive to the addition of meaningful predictors. We apply these methods to compare predictive survival models for cancer recurrence.

Related

  1. The Conway knot has infinite order in smooth concordance
    Marco Golla, Juanita Pinzón-Caicedo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXivHAL
  2. Psh variation of singular Kähler-Einstein metrics and Invariance of plurigenera for smooth Kähler families
    Yinji Li, Mihai Păun, Zhiwei Wang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. On the Definition and Smooth Examples of Weakly Kähler--Finsler Metrics
    Xiaoshu Ge
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Failure of local extension of semipositive metrics in a smooth projective family
    Xiangsen Qin
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. A Model-threshold Dimension Bound and Sharp Critical Ends for Smooth Singular Sets of Constant Positive σk-curvature Metrics
    Jiahuan Li, Yilu Liu, Xi-Nan Ma
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hartman2026smooth,
  title = {{Smooth Concordance Metrics for Survival Models}},
  author = {Nicholas Hartman and Grace Richards},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.06411},
  eprint = {2606.06411},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06411},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Smooth Concordance Metrics for Survival Models
AU  - Nicholas Hartman
AU  - Grace Richards
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.06411
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06411
AB  - Concordance indices are widely popular metrics for assessing the ability of predictive survival models to discriminate underlying risk levels. However, these statistics have also been criticized for using only the rank orderings of the model's predicted risk scores and being insensitive to important model features, such as the addition of strong predictor variables into the model. In this paper, we address these limitations by developing smooth concordance metrics that model the underlying risk discrimination probabilities as continuous functions of the predicted risk score differences, where the shapes of these functions are estimated from the observed data. As a result, these smooth concordance metrics assess model performance across the entire range of possible risk score differences, allowing one to identify specific scenarios where the candidate model performs especially well or better than other models. Simulations show that the proposed smooth concordance metrics provide more detailed information about risk discrimination performance and are much more sensitive to the addition of meaningful predictors. We apply these methods to compare predictive survival models for cancer recurrence.
ER  -