Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Error-Conditioned Neural Solvers

Abstract

Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution. Recent hybrid methods promote physical correctness by targeting the PDE residual via gradient descent or Gauss--Newton steps, but inherit the compute cost and instability of the underlying classical optimizers. We show, theoretically and empirically, that numerically minimizing the PDE residual can be an unreliable proxy for reconstruction accuracy in ill-conditioned systems, explaining why these methods often do not make accurate predictions despite achieving low residuals. We propose error-conditioned Neural Solvers (ENS), built on a different principle: rather than an optimization target, the PDE residual field is passed as a direct input to the network at each iteration, enabling it to read the spatial structure of its own errors and learn an update policy to iteratively correct its predictions. Across four PDE families, ENS attains the highest prediction accuracy in the large majority of settings, with gains reaching 10× on turbulent Kolmogorov flow, while avoiding the expensive compute cost of hybrid methods. ENS's learned correction policy generalizes under distribution shift, including zero-shot parameter changes and cross-equation transfer, where its relative advantage is largest in the ill-conditioned regimes where residual minimization is least reliable. Project website: https://neuralsolver.github.io/.

Related

  1. Singular parameters and missing limits in neural PDE solvers
    Daniel Fernández
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. The Symbol of the Surrogate: Measuring Numerical Provenance in Neural PDE Solvers
    Ridham Patel
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsStatisticsarXiv
  3. Beyond PINNs: A Unified Gauss--Newton and Petrov--Galerkin Framework for Neural and Hybrid PDE Solvers
    Nilo Schwencke, Roland Maier
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. Soliton Profiles in 1D: Enhanced Neural-Network Solvers and Constrained Deep Ritz Methods
    Chandler Haight, Alex D Rodriguez, Svetlana Roudenko
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Physics-Informed Neural Plasticity: PDE Solvers That Reshape Themselves
    Chun-Wun Cheng, Bingcheng Hu, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jiang2026errorconditioned,
  title = {{Error-Conditioned Neural Solvers}},
  author = {Haina Jiang and Liam Wang and Peng-Chen Chen and Min Seop Kwak and Seungryong Kim and Brian Bell and Jeong Joon Park},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.27354},
  eprint = {2606.27354},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27354},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Error-Conditioned Neural Solvers
AU  - Haina Jiang
AU  - Liam Wang
AU  - Peng-Chen Chen
AU  - Min Seop Kwak
AU  - Seungryong Kim
AU  - Brian Bell
AU  - Jeong Joon Park
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.27354
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27354
AB  - Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution. Recent hybrid methods promote physical correctness by targeting the PDE residual via gradient descent or Gauss--Newton steps, but inherit the compute cost and instability of the underlying classical optimizers. We show, theoretically and empirically, that numerically minimizing the PDE residual can be an unreliable proxy for reconstruction accuracy in ill-conditioned systems, explaining why these methods often do not make accurate predictions despite achieving low residuals. We propose error-conditioned Neural Solvers (ENS), built on a different principle: rather than an optimization target, the PDE residual field is passed as a direct input to the network at each iteration, enabling it to read the spatial structure of its own errors and learn an update policy to iteratively correct its predictions. Across four PDE families, ENS attains the highest prediction accuracy in the large majority of settings, with gains reaching 10× on turbulent Kolmogorov flow, while avoiding the expensive compute cost of hybrid methods. ENS's learned correction policy generalizes under distribution shift, including zero-shot parameter changes and cross-equation transfer, where its relative advantage is largest in the ill-conditioned regimes where residual minimization is least reliable. Project website: https://neuralsolver.github.io/.
ER  -