When ownership is not enough: Evaluating the co-development and uptake of the Options Assessment Toolkit (OAT) for Plasmodium vivax radical cure in malaria-endemic countries
- 1Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- 2Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN) Vivax Working Group, Singapore, Singapore
- 3MMV Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Geneva, Switzerland
Abstract
Radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria remains a major challenge in endemic countries. New treatment options add opportunities but also increase complexity of policy decisions. Malaria treatment policies are often shaped by World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance, limiting scope for local adaptation. The Options Assessment Toolkit (OAT) was developed to support national policy making for the radical cure of vivax malaria. This study evaluates its co-development, uptake and practical influence. We conducted a qualitative study with stakeholders in Afghanistan, the Solomon Islands, and Vietnam (co-developers) and Nepal (new user context). In-depth interviews were conducted with representatives from the National Malaria Programs between January and March 2025. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12, guided by pre-defined research questions, and reported according to COREQ criteria. Participants described a strong ownership resulting from the inclusive co-development process. However, none of the co-developing countries used the OAT for formal policy decision-making. Instead, it primarily supported structured deliberation, planning, and contextual appraisal of emerging treatment options. A key finding was the conflation between decision-support and implementation feasibility: the toolkit’s perceived value was often judged according to whether recommended strategies could be operationalised within existing system constraints. Instrumental uptake was shaped by institutional structures, system readiness, variation in national analytic capacity, and reliance on WHO endorsement. The findings suggest that ownership alone is insufficient for institutional uptake. Decision-support tools exert influence primarily by reshaping deliberation, but require embedding within formal policy, regulatory, and financing processes for sustained impact.
Related
- Predicting Air Conditioner Ownership in Low- and Middle-Income Countries using Geospatial Machine Learning Methods - Mapping Cooling Inequality
- Delayed diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax malaria and associated factors among Thai patients and patients from neighboring countries at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Bangkok, Thailand
- Human hemoglobin protects the parasite cytoskeleton during Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte development
- Plasmodium chabaudi malaria parasites adjust liver stage development to synchronise egressing blood stages with host daily rhythms
- Translating Evidence for Early Intervention in Psychosis (TRANSLATE): Protocol for Evaluating the Implementation of Early Intervention in Psychosis in Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs).
BibTeX
@article{shrestha2026when,
title = {{When ownership is not enough: Evaluating the co-development and uptake of the Options Assessment Toolkit (OAT) for Plasmodium vivax radical cure in malaria-endemic countries}},
author = {Bijaya Shrestha and Neena Valecha and Kamala Thriemer and Caroline Anita Lynch},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006510},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006510},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - When ownership is not enough: Evaluating the co-development and uptake of the Options Assessment Toolkit (OAT) for Plasmodium vivax radical cure in malaria-endemic countries
AU - Bijaya Shrestha
AU - Neena Valecha
AU - Kamala Thriemer
AU - Caroline Anita Lynch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/12
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006510
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006510
AB - Radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria remains a major challenge in endemic countries. New treatment options add opportunities but also increase complexity of policy decisions. Malaria treatment policies are often shaped by World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance, limiting scope for local adaptation. The Options Assessment Toolkit (OAT) was developed to support national policy making for the radical cure of vivax malaria. This study evaluates its co-development, uptake and practical influence. We conducted a qualitative study with stakeholders in Afghanistan, the Solomon Islands, and Vietnam (co-developers) and Nepal (new user context). In-depth interviews were conducted with representatives from the National Malaria Programs between January and March 2025. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12, guided by pre-defined research questions, and reported according to COREQ criteria. Participants described a strong ownership resulting from the inclusive co-development process. However, none of the co-developing countries used the OAT for formal policy decision-making. Instead, it primarily supported structured deliberation, planning, and contextual appraisal of emerging treatment options. A key finding was the conflation between decision-support and implementation feasibility: the toolkit’s perceived value was often judged according to whether recommended strategies could be operationalised within existing system constraints. Instrumental uptake was shaped by institutional structures, system readiness, variation in national analytic capacity, and reliance on WHO endorsement. The findings suggest that ownership alone is insufficient for institutional uptake. Decision-support tools exert influence primarily by reshaping deliberation, but require embedding within formal policy, regulatory, and financing processes for sustained impact.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -