Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Conditional Independence Testing in Time Series

Abstract

We consider the problem of testing Granger causality in time series, specifically, whether the future outcome Yt+1 and the exposure history X̅t are conditionally independent given the history of Y̅t and a set of confounding variables Z̅t up to time t. This testing procedure distinguishes true causal effects from associations driven by common external processes, supporting reliable decision-makings in applications such as finance, neuroscience, and climate science. While traditional approaches assume a linear vector autoregressive (VAR) model and are vulnerable to misspecification, we instead address a model-free version of the problem. We propose nonlinearly regressing both the outcome and exposure on the joint history of Y and Z, and calculating a test statistic based on the sample covariance of residuals, we call the Generalised Temporal Covariance Measure (GTCM). To account for heteroscedasticity and improve power against local alternatives, we incorporate variance weights and employ a data-adaptive test based on polynomial lag expansions.The type I error control of the test relies on the relatively weak assumption that user-chosen regression procedures estimate conditional means at a sufficiently fast rate that is slow enough to accommodate nonparametric settings. By further assuming stability of the regression procedures and weak dependence in the time series, we can utilise the entire dataset to estimate the conditional means without splitting the time series into subsets.

Related

  1. Sequential Conditional Independence Testing with Machine Learning Models
    Angel Reyero-Lobo, Michele Meziu, Sebastian Uriel Arias +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Graph-Based Testing of Conditional Mean Independence with Applications to Large Language Model Evaluation
    Mingshuo Liu, Qihua Zhu, Jingchi Liao +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Conditional independence testing through marginal permutation
    Jiahao Ai, Ziang Niu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Embedding-Bias in Conditional Independence Testing
    Nikolaj Thams, Anton Rask Lundborg
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Domain-Adapted Diffusion Models for Conditional Independence Testing
    Yanfeng Yang, Junda Zhao, Yijie Gao +8
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{shi2026conditional,
  title = {{Conditional Independence Testing in Time Series}},
  author = {Jieru Shi and Rajen D. Shah},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20772},
  eprint = {2609.20772},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20772},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Conditional Independence Testing in Time Series
AU  - Jieru Shi
AU  - Rajen D. Shah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20772
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20772
AB  - We consider the problem of testing Granger causality in time series, specifically, whether the future outcome Y_t+1 and the exposure history X̅_t are conditionally independent given the history of Y̅_t and a set of confounding variables Z̅_t up to time t. This testing procedure distinguishes true causal effects from associations driven by common external processes, supporting reliable decision-makings in applications such as finance, neuroscience, and climate science. While traditional approaches assume a linear vector autoregressive (VAR) model and are vulnerable to misspecification, we instead address a model-free version of the problem. We propose nonlinearly regressing both the outcome and exposure on the joint history of Y and Z, and calculating a test statistic based on the sample covariance of residuals, we call the Generalised Temporal Covariance Measure (GTCM). To account for heteroscedasticity and improve power against local alternatives, we incorporate variance weights and employ a data-adaptive test based on polynomial lag expansions.The type I error control of the test relies on the relatively weak assumption that user-chosen regression procedures estimate conditional means at a sufficiently fast rate that is slow enough to accommodate nonparametric settings. By further assuming stability of the regression procedures and weak dependence in the time series, we can utilise the entire dataset to estimate the conditional means without splitting the time series into subsets.
ER  -