Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for repetitive negative thinking versus internet-based CBT: a pilot randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary care among patients with anxiety, depression and stress

  1. 1Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  2. 2University Clinic Primary Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Region Skåne Sweden
  3. 3Department of Psychology and Social Work, Clinical Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden

Abstract

Background: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process relevant to common mental health problems in primary care. RNT-ACT is a brief acceptance and commitment therapy-based protocol targeting RNT in two sessions. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of RNT-ACT compared with therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) in Swedish primary care.

Methods: Thirteen participants were randomised: 7 to RNT-ACT and 6 to iCBT. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, intervention non-completion, and patient satisfaction measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Symptom and process measures were secondary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Analyses were descriptive and exploratory, based on available observations without imputation of missing data.

Results: Thirteen of 20 eligible individuals were enrolled (65%), corresponding to 35% of all 37 individuals screened. All participants in the RNT-ACT group completed the intervention, whereas 4 of 6 participants in the iCBT group did not complete the intervention. Mean CSQ-8 scores were 27.8 (SD 3.7; n = 5) in the RNT-ACT group and 23.0 (SD 0.0; n = 2) in the iCBT group.

Conclusions: The small sample size and high iCBT non-completion limit between-group comparisons. Further investigation of recruitment, treatment engagement, and patient and therapist experiences is needed before determining whether and how to proceed to a full-scale RCT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946382 registered July 14, 2023.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2.

Related

  1. Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on psychological and health-related outcomes in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiaohuan Li, Weijin Huang, Ying Gao +2
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  2. Evaluating 20-session augmented depression therapy for complex depression (ADepT+) versus usual care: a study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
    Laura Warbrick, Katie Marchant, Paul Moran +7
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Feasibility and acceptability of a remote blood pressure monitoring pharmacist-led telehealth programme in an emergency department transition care clinic: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Lama Ghazi, Paulina Gonzalez-Flores, Emily Green Vance +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Anakinra versus intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate for gout flares in people with chronic kidney disease (ASGARD): a UK randomised multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy controlled feasibility study with economic, qualitative and safety assessment
    Gowrie Balasubramaniam, Mike Almond, Patrick Harnett +12
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. A randomised feasibility trial of VR-enhanced cue exposure therapy versus neutral VR exposure for cocaine use disorder, with wearable monitoring and JITA-EMA: Feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol
    Eileen Brobbin, Matteo Cella, Alexandre Copello +17
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyGeneral chemistryPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bengtsson2026feasibility,
  title = {{Feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for repetitive negative thinking versus internet-based CBT: a pilot randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary care among patients with anxiety, depression and stress}},
  author = {Thor Bengtsson and Moa Wolff and Andreas Larsson and Peter Nymberg and Veronica Milos Nymberg},
  journal = {Pilot and Feasibility Studies},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for repetitive negative thinking versus internet-based CBT: a pilot randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary care among patients with anxiety, depression and stress
AU  - Thor Bengtsson
AU  - Moa Wolff
AU  - Andreas Larsson
AU  - Peter Nymberg
AU  - Veronica Milos Nymberg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Pilot and Feasibility Studies
DO  - 10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2
AB  - Background: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process relevant to common mental health problems in primary care. RNT-ACT is a brief acceptance and commitment therapy-based protocol targeting RNT in two sessions. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of RNT-ACT compared with therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) in Swedish primary care.  Methods: Thirteen participants were randomised: 7 to RNT-ACT and 6 to iCBT. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, intervention non-completion, and patient satisfaction measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Symptom and process measures were secondary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Analyses were descriptive and exploratory, based on available observations without imputation of missing data.  Results: Thirteen of 20 eligible individuals were enrolled (65%), corresponding to 35% of all 37 individuals screened. All participants in the RNT-ACT group completed the intervention, whereas 4 of 6 participants in the iCBT group did not complete the intervention. Mean CSQ-8 scores were 27.8 (SD 3.7; n = 5) in the RNT-ACT group and 23.0 (SD 0.0; n = 2) in the iCBT group.  Conclusions: The small sample size and high iCBT non-completion limit between-group comparisons. Further investigation of recruitment, treatment engagement, and patient and therapist experiences is needed before determining whether and how to proceed to a full-scale RCT.  Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946382 registered July 14, 2023.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01951-2.
SN  - 2055-5784
ER  -