Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Optimization of Search and Acquisition Strategies for DSSO Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry using Protein Prospector and Touchstone.

  1. 1University of California San Francisco

Abstract

Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) enables residue-level characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in both purified assemblies and complex biological systems. Cleavable crosslinkers such as DSSO are widely used to facilitate analysis of complex samples, yet there remains limited consensus on how best to leverage their properties in both acquisition and data analysis workflows. In part, this reflects differences in scoring, classification, and false discovery rate (FDR) estimation across analysis pipelines. Therefore, an integrated XL-MS data analysis pipeline that enables confident identification of MS-cleavable cross-linked peptides through improved scoring and rigorous FDR assessment is essential for systematically comparing and benchmarking workflows across different sample preparations. To this end, we implemented a new capability within the Protein Prospector search engine to improve MS2-based identification of MS-cleavable cross-linked peptides. Next, we developed Touchstone, a framework for re-scoring, classification, FDR-controlled summarization, and visualization of Prospector XL-MS search results. Using this approach, we evaluate the contributions of DSSO-specific fragmentation features and compare multiple acquisition strategies across datasets ranging from purified macromolecular assemblies to proteome-scale samples. We find that the primary advantage of DSSO arises from enhanced backbone fragmentation of both linked peptides, rather than from diagnostic ion formation, and that incorporating diagnostic ion pairs into MS2-based scoring or filtering does not improve identification performance. Benchmarking against established datasets shows that Prospector-Touchstone performs comparably to leading methods for non-cleavable crosslinkers and provides improved performance for DSSO analysis. We further compare acquisition strategies and find that for purified protein assemblies, MS2.stHCD characterizes more residue-pairs than ETD-based, MS3-based, and hybrid methods. In contrast, for proteome-scale XL-MS, MS3-based acquisition yields similar numbers of inter-protein PPIs with lower error rates despite reduced sampling depth. Together, these results highlight complementary strengths of MS2- and MS3-based workflows and provide practical guidance for MS-cleavable XL-MS experiments with varying sample complexities.

Related

  1. Brain Landscape In Situ Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry (BLIS-XL-MS) Enables Global Analysis of Protein Structural Remodeling in the Brain
    Y.-Z. Wang, J. Xu, A. Contractor +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Proteome-wide crosslinking mass spectrometry reveals novel components of essential complexes in Toxoplasma
    S. Butterworth, A. L. Gin, S. Shikha +10
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. FAIMS-GPF XL-MS: crosslinking-mass spectrometry based on gas-phase fractionation
    Hugo Gizardin-Fredon, Salvatore Terrosu, Simon Pichard +6
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStructural biologyGeneral biologyHAL
  4. Multi-Enzyme Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Proteoform-Aware Single-shot Proteomics
    M. Heusel, L. Happonen, C. A. Q. Karlsson +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  5. Micro-online and Micro-offline Learning Reflect Stable Yet Randomly Distributed Strategies in Motor Skill Acquisition
    Christopher Fricke, Christoph Muehlberg, Paulina Juettner +4
    The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textNeurosciencePMC
BibTeX
@misc{trnka2026optimization,
  title = {{Optimization of Search and Acquisition Strategies for DSSO Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry using Protein Prospector and Touchstone.}},
  author = {M. J. Trnka and C. Yu and P. R. Baker and P. T. McGilvray and F. Jiao and R. J. Keenan and A. Burlingame and R. J. Chalkley and L. Huang},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.757733},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757733v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimization of Search and Acquisition Strategies for DSSO Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry using Protein Prospector and Touchstone.
AU  - M. J. Trnka
AU  - C. Yu
AU  - P. R. Baker
AU  - P. T. McGilvray
AU  - F. Jiao
AU  - R. J. Keenan
AU  - A. Burlingame
AU  - R. J. Chalkley
AU  - L. Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.08.757733
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757733v1
AB  - Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) enables residue-level characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in both purified assemblies and complex biological systems. Cleavable crosslinkers such as DSSO are widely used to facilitate analysis of complex samples, yet there remains limited consensus on how best to leverage their properties in both acquisition and data analysis workflows. In part, this reflects differences in scoring, classification, and false discovery rate (FDR) estimation across analysis pipelines. Therefore, an integrated XL-MS data analysis pipeline that enables confident identification of MS-cleavable cross-linked peptides through improved scoring and rigorous FDR assessment is essential for systematically comparing and benchmarking workflows across different sample preparations. To this end, we implemented a new capability within the Protein Prospector search engine to improve MS2-based identification of MS-cleavable cross-linked peptides. Next, we developed Touchstone, a framework for re-scoring, classification, FDR-controlled summarization, and visualization of Prospector XL-MS search results. Using this approach, we evaluate the contributions of DSSO-specific fragmentation features and compare multiple acquisition strategies across datasets ranging from purified macromolecular assemblies to proteome-scale samples. We find that the primary advantage of DSSO arises from enhanced backbone fragmentation of both linked peptides, rather than from diagnostic ion formation, and that incorporating diagnostic ion pairs into MS2-based scoring or filtering does not improve identification performance. Benchmarking against established datasets shows that Prospector-Touchstone performs comparably to leading methods for non-cleavable crosslinkers and provides improved performance for DSSO analysis. We further compare acquisition strategies and find that for purified protein assemblies, MS2.stHCD characterizes more residue-pairs than ETD-based, MS3-based, and hybrid methods. In contrast, for proteome-scale XL-MS, MS3-based acquisition yields similar numbers of inter-protein PPIs with lower error rates despite reduced sampling depth. Together, these results highlight complementary strengths of MS2- and MS3-based workflows and provide practical guidance for MS-cleavable XL-MS experiments with varying sample complexities.
ER  -