Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Multi-period Value-at-Risk Constrained Portfolio Optimization via DC Programming

Abstract

We study a multi-period portfolio optimization problem with finite-scenario Value-at-Risk (VaR) constraints, transaction costs, and diversification regularization. Using a finite-scenario VaR--CVaR identity, we derive a penalized difference-of-convex (DC) formulation over the underlying convex portfolio set. To solve the resulting nonsmooth and nonconvex problem, we propose a projected inertial Boosted Difference-of-Convex Functions Algorithm (iBDCA) that combines inertial extrapolation, an objective safeguard, and a boosted line search. We prove that the method is well defined, generates a monotonically decreasing objective sequence, and has only critical accumulation points for the penalized DC problem. Under a local no-ties condition at an accumulation point, we further establish whole sequence convergence with a local R-linear rate. Numerical experiments compare iBDCA with DCA and standard BDCA on matched problem instances. Out-of-sample backtests additionally include equal-weight and buy-and-hold benchmarks to illustrate the trade-offs among realized return, risk, transaction costs, and empirical VaR control.

Related

  1. Multi-period Mean-Expectile Portfolio Optimization under Wasserstein Ambiguity: Reformulation, Degeneracy and the Role of the Ground Metric
    Rupendra Yadav, Aparna Mehra
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Portfolio-Based Constrained Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design
    Sushant Sinha, Christofer Hardcastle, Robert Robinson +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsCondensed matterarXiv
  3. MF-SCBO : Multi-fidelity Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimization
    Lucas Palazzolo, Mickaël Binois, Laëtitia Giraldi
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  4. McCormick relaxations for PDE-constrained optimization on multi-dimensional domains
    Mariia Pokotylo, Paul Manns
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization
    Dara Varam, Mohamed I. Alhajri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026multiperiod,
  title = {{Multi-period Value-at-Risk Constrained Portfolio Optimization via DC Programming}},
  author = {Thi Thu Van Nguyen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.13748},
  eprint = {2608.13748},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13748},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Multi-period Value-at-Risk Constrained Portfolio Optimization via DC Programming
AU  - Thi Thu Van Nguyen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.13748
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13748
AB  - We study a multi-period portfolio optimization problem with finite-scenario Value-at-Risk (VaR) constraints, transaction costs, and diversification regularization. Using a finite-scenario VaR--CVaR identity, we derive a penalized difference-of-convex (DC) formulation over the underlying convex portfolio set. To solve the resulting nonsmooth and nonconvex problem, we propose a projected inertial Boosted Difference-of-Convex Functions Algorithm (iBDCA) that combines inertial extrapolation, an objective safeguard, and a boosted line search. We prove that the method is well defined, generates a monotonically decreasing objective sequence, and has only critical accumulation points for the penalized DC problem. Under a local no-ties condition at an accumulation point, we further establish whole sequence convergence with a local R-linear rate. Numerical experiments compare iBDCA with DCA and standard BDCA on matched problem instances. Out-of-sample backtests additionally include equal-weight and buy-and-hold benchmarks to illustrate the trade-offs among realized return, risk, transaction costs, and empirical VaR control.
ER  -