Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy (PFEILD): A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Pilot Cohort Study.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
  2. 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraydah, SAU.
  3. 3Diabetes and Endocrinology, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraydah, SAU.
  4. 4Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Ula, SAU.

Abstract

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem among adults, with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) being a common underlying cause. While many patients with LDH respond to conservative management, surgical intervention may be required in selected cases. Percutaneous full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PFEILD) is a minimally invasive percutaneous endoscopic discectomy that offers several potential advantages, including reduced tissue disruption, shorter hospital stays, and faster postoperative recovery. However, few studies in our region have evaluated the clinical and functional outcomes of this technique. Methods A total of 25 patients who attended the spinal surgery unit at Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (DSFH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and underwent PFEILD between January 2019 and January 2023 were included. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of PFEILD in terms of length of hospital stay, time to return to work, postoperative complications, recurrence, and clinical and functional improvement. The patients were followed postoperatively for approximately 24-36 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the MacNab criteria, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Data were collected from the hospital electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29 (Released 2022; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results Of the 25 patients, 68% (n=17) were discharged within one postoperative day, while 96% (n=24) experienced no postoperative complications. An excellent postoperative outcome according to the MacNab criteria was reported in 80% (n=20) of patients. Preoperatively, 92% (n=23) of participants had a VAS score for leg pain >5/10, compared with 96% (n=24) who had a postoperative VAS score <5/10. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores was statistically significant (P<0.001). Furthermore, 72% (n=18) of patients had a preoperative ODI score >40, whereas none had a postoperative ODI score >40. The difference between preoperative and postoperative ODI scores was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Minimally invasive PFEILD demonstrated favorable clinical and functional outcomes, with significant improvements in leg pain and disability, short postoperative hospital stays, early return to work, and a low rate of complications. Further large-scale, prospective, multi-center studies are recommended to validate these findings and assess the long-term outcomes of this technique.

Related

  1. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Quantitative MRI-Based Decompression Analysis.
    Shanxi Wang, Jianbin Guan, Tuanjiang Liu +4
    Global spine journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  2. Comparison Between Interlaminar and Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Sciatic Scoliosis Secondary to Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 1 Year Follow‐Up
    Shicheng Zheng, Xincheng Cai, Bolu Zhang +6
    Orthopaedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Clinical efficacy of Delta large-channel endoscopy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in treating far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.
    Yong Xu, Yilei Zhao, Qinyi Jiang +1
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Association of preoperative Pfirrmann grade with 12-month outcomes after interlaminar full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy with successful annular suture repair: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
    Lei Zhou, Haoyun Huang, Song Zhu +6
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Two-Dimensional Electromagnetic Navigation-Assisted Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
    Zhong Wei, Haoyu Cheng, Ren Gao +7
    Orthopaedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{farah2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy (PFEILD): A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Pilot Cohort Study.}},
  author = {Asim Abdelgader A Farah and Mahdi Bassi and Hassan Siddiq and Nihal Abdelrazig A Mohammed and Thorea Abdelgadir A Farah and Rana Alrasheed and Omaim Hussein},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.116744},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924040},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy (PFEILD): A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Pilot Cohort Study.
AU  - Asim Abdelgader A Farah
AU  - Mahdi Bassi
AU  - Hassan Siddiq
AU  - Nihal Abdelrazig A Mohammed
AU  - Thorea Abdelgadir A Farah
AU  - Rana Alrasheed
AU  - Omaim Hussein
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.116744
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924040
AB  - Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem among adults, with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) being a common underlying cause. While many patients with LDH respond to conservative management, surgical intervention may be required in selected cases. Percutaneous full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PFEILD) is a minimally invasive percutaneous endoscopic discectomy that offers several potential advantages, including reduced tissue disruption, shorter hospital stays, and faster postoperative recovery. However, few studies in our region have evaluated the clinical and functional outcomes of this technique. Methods A total of 25 patients who attended the spinal surgery unit at Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (DSFH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and underwent PFEILD between January 2019 and January 2023 were included. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of PFEILD in terms of length of hospital stay, time to return to work, postoperative complications, recurrence, and clinical and functional improvement. The patients were followed postoperatively for approximately 24-36 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the MacNab criteria, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Data were collected from the hospital electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29 (Released 2022; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results Of the 25 patients, 68% (n=17) were discharged within one postoperative day, while 96% (n=24) experienced no postoperative complications. An excellent postoperative outcome according to the MacNab criteria was reported in 80% (n=20) of patients. Preoperatively, 92% (n=23) of participants had a VAS score for leg pain >5/10, compared with 96% (n=24) who had a postoperative VAS score <5/10. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores was statistically significant (P<0.001). Furthermore, 72% (n=18) of patients had a preoperative ODI score >40, whereas none had a postoperative ODI score >40. The difference between preoperative and postoperative ODI scores was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Minimally invasive PFEILD demonstrated favorable clinical and functional outcomes, with significant improvements in leg pain and disability, short postoperative hospital stays, early return to work, and a low rate of complications. Further large-scale, prospective, multi-center studies are recommended to validate these findings and assess the long-term outcomes of this technique.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -