Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

On Control of Drawdown: Robust Invariance and Optimality

Abstract

Mitigating \emph{drawdown}, the decline in wealth from its running peak, presents a canonical problem in path-dependent risk control. In this paper, we develop a finite-horizon control framework that enforces a prescribed maximum percentage drawdown limit in multi-asset stochastic systems. Our first result is an exact robust-invariance theorem characterizing every control action that preserves a prescribed drawdown limit against all supported returns. We show that every robustly safe control admits a \emph{drawdown-modulated} form: the product of the current drawdown \emph{cushion} and a feasible \emph{normalized direction}. This yields a complete parameterization of robustly drawdown-safe policies. Additionally, under stagewise-independent returns, we show that optimizing over all robustly safe causal policies reduces to a one-dimensional Bellman recursion and yields an optimal robustly safe state-feedback policy. Finally, we characterize the linear time-invariant (LTI) gains satisfying a prescribed drawdown limit and prove that optimal drawdown modulation achieves no lower expected return under the same limit. Strict expected-return improvement holds for horizons of at least two stages whenever the LTI policy has positive expected one-stage net return.

Related

  1. Optimality of Affine Policies in Distributionally Robust Linear-Quadratic Control with Temporally Correlated Noise
    Jakob Nylöf, Daniel Kuhn, John Lygeros +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Optimality and Exact Moment-SDP Formulations for Robust Two-Stage Convex Polynomial Multiobjective Optimization
    Yongqi Jiang, Zhe Hong, Chengmiao Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Robust Local Fréchet Regression: Nonasymptotic Theory and Minimax Optimality
    Chang Jun Im, Daisuke Kurisu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. On p-robust convergence and optimality of adaptive FEM driven by equilibrated-flux estimators
    Théophile Chaumont-Frelet, Zhaonan Dong, Gregor Gantner +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingHAL
  5. On the Optimality of Random Features under General Conditions: Misspecified Cases and Robust Learning
    Caixing Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hsieh2026control,
  title = {{On Control of Drawdown: Robust Invariance and Optimality}},
  author = {Chung-Han Hsieh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23272},
  eprint = {2609.23272},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23272},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On Control of Drawdown: Robust Invariance and Optimality
AU  - Chung-Han Hsieh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23272
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23272
AB  - Mitigating \emph{drawdown}, the decline in wealth from its running peak, presents a canonical problem in path-dependent risk control. In this paper, we develop a finite-horizon control framework that enforces a prescribed maximum percentage drawdown limit in multi-asset stochastic systems. Our first result is an exact robust-invariance theorem characterizing every control action that preserves a prescribed drawdown limit against all supported returns. We show that every robustly safe control admits a \emph{drawdown-modulated} form: the product of the current drawdown \emph{cushion} and a feasible \emph{normalized direction}. This yields a complete parameterization of robustly drawdown-safe policies. Additionally, under stagewise-independent returns, we show that optimizing over all robustly safe causal policies reduces to a one-dimensional Bellman recursion and yields an optimal robustly safe state-feedback policy. Finally, we characterize the linear time-invariant (LTI) gains satisfying a prescribed drawdown limit and prove that optimal drawdown modulation achieves no lower expected return under the same limit. Strict expected-return improvement holds for horizons of at least two stages whenever the LTI policy has positive expected one-stage net return.
ER  -