Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDInternational journal of emergency medicine

Limitations of NEWS2 for predicting 48-hour emergency department revisits: a real-world retrospective cohort study.

  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthawaroros Road, Sribhumi, Amphoe Muang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthawaroros Road, Sribhumi, Amphoe Muang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Early revisits to the emergency department (ED) are commonly used as a quality indicator and reflect challenges in discharge decision-making. Although the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is widely used to detect clinical deterioration, its ability to predict early ED revisits after discharge remains unclear.Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital ED in Thailand from January 2019 to June 2022. Adult patients discharged from the ED were included. The primary outcome was an unplanned same-institution ED revisit within 48 h. Initial triage NEWS2 scores were analyzed, and predictive performance was assessed using overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and threshold-specific operating characteristics.Results

Among 75,609 eligible index visits, 182 (0.24%) were followed by an unplanned ED revisit within 48 h. Initial triage NEWS2 showed no clinically useful discrimination (AUROC 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.58). A cut-off ≥ 2 provided modest sensitivity (58.2%) but low specificity (52.3%); higher cut-offs improved specificity at the expense of sensitivity. Positive predictive values were extremely low and likelihood ratios were close to 1.Conclusion

NEWS2, when used alone at initial ED triage, is insufficient for predicting unplanned 48-hour ED revisits. Early revisits may be influenced by multiple clinical, patient, and system-level factors beyond initial physiological abnormality. Multidimensional risk assessment tools may be more appropriate for supporting safe ED discharge decisions.Registration trial number

TCTR20230816010, registered on 16 August 2023 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, www.thaiclinicaltrials.org).

Related

  1. Development and internal validation of a simple risk stratification score for unplanned emergency department revisits within 24 hours after discharge: A retrospective observational study
    Hidetaka Onda, Yuma Kuramatsu, Toyoaki Yamamoto +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyImmunologyPLOS
  2. Initial Emergency Department Triage Narratives for Predicting Hospital Admission and Early Critical Outcomes: A Retrospective Chronological Split Study
    Patryk Konieczka, Julia Żukowska-Karolak, Tomasz Kłosiewicz
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. On-Device ECG and Vital-Sign Prediction of 24-Hour Mortality and Unplanned ICU Admission in Emergency Department Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation of MEDI-AI
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Low-risk Features of Emergency Department Patients on a Sepsis Pathway: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    B. Wyler, C. Yang, S. E. Sondheim +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Associations between use of targeted therapies, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits among patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective cohort study
    Richard Ta, Jong Min Jung, Kyu Eun Lee +1
    Journal of Managed Care & Specialty PharmacyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{permpatdechakul2026limitations,
  title = {{Limitations of NEWS2 for predicting 48-hour emergency department revisits: a real-world retrospective cohort study.}},
  author = {Sarunpakorn Permpatdechakul and Theerapon Tangsuwanaruk and Borwon Wittayachamnankul and Pavita Laohakul and Chanon Changratanakorn and Boriboon Chenthanakij},
  journal = {International journal of emergency medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12245-026-01325-8},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968000},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Limitations of NEWS2 for predicting 48-hour emergency department revisits: a real-world retrospective cohort study.
AU  - Sarunpakorn Permpatdechakul
AU  - Theerapon Tangsuwanaruk
AU  - Borwon Wittayachamnankul
AU  - Pavita Laohakul
AU  - Chanon Changratanakorn
AU  - Boriboon Chenthanakij
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/04
JO  - International journal of emergency medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s12245-026-01325-8
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968000
AB  - Background  Early revisits to the emergency department (ED) are commonly used as a quality indicator and reflect challenges in discharge decision-making. Although the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is widely used to detect clinical deterioration, its ability to predict early ED revisits after discharge remains unclear.Methods  We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital ED in Thailand from January 2019 to June 2022. Adult patients discharged from the ED were included. The primary outcome was an unplanned same-institution ED revisit within 48 h. Initial triage NEWS2 scores were analyzed, and predictive performance was assessed using overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and threshold-specific operating characteristics.Results  Among 75,609 eligible index visits, 182 (0.24%) were followed by an unplanned ED revisit within 48 h. Initial triage NEWS2 showed no clinically useful discrimination (AUROC 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.58). A cut-off ≥ 2 provided modest sensitivity (58.2%) but low specificity (52.3%); higher cut-offs improved specificity at the expense of sensitivity. Positive predictive values were extremely low and likelihood ratios were close to 1.Conclusion  NEWS2, when used alone at initial ED triage, is insufficient for predicting unplanned 48-hour ED revisits. Early revisits may be influenced by multiple clinical, patient, and system-level factors beyond initial physiological abnormality. Multidimensional risk assessment tools may be more appropriate for supporting safe ED discharge decisions.Registration trial number  TCTR20230816010, registered on 16 August 2023 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, www.thaiclinicaltrials.org).
SN  - 1865-1372
SN  - 1865-1380
ER  -