Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Stewardship in 14 Adult ICUs and Wards.

8 more authors
  1. 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Data are limited on factors associated with successful implementation of diagnostic stewardship interventions to improve blood culture (BCx) ordering in adult inpatients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a quality improvement (QI) initiative to improve BCx ordering and to evaluate factors associated with improved practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a pragmatic QI initiative over a one-year period in seven acute care academic hospitals in the United States. A total of 14 adult units, seven intensive care units (ICUs) and seven wards from each hospital were included. The study was conducted between April st 2022 and June 30th, 2024. Data analysis was performed March 1st to October 25th, 2026. Intervention: The QI included implementation of an evidence-based BCx algorithm with indications for blood cultures, education on the algorithm, and monitoring and feedback of BCx practices. Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was BCx utilization (BCU) 12 months before and after implementation. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we assessed implementation through interviews with QI teams, diaries of QI activities completed by each team, and a survey of frontline providers. Coincidence analysis was used to identify implementation factors associated with improvement in BCU. Results: Four ICUs had significantly lower BCU (~20% reduction), one of them also had a 50% increase in BCx positivity. Greater baseline BCx inappropriateness was associated with significant reduction in BCU. Two wards had a significant increase in BCU, one of which had a concomitant increase in BCx positivity. An additional ward had a 60% increase in BCx positivity despite similar BCU before and after QI implementation. Coincidence analysis identified several factors associated with improved BCU, including perceptions that the algorithm was easy to use and reduced unnecessary repeat BCx, as well as nurse inclusion in educational activities and regular education and feedback on BCx practices. Conclusion: Baseline BCU should inform the design and focus of BCx stewardship initiatives. Effective improvement efforts require multifaceted implementation strategies.

Related

  1. General practitioners’ perspectives on barriers and facilitators of the implementation of the ANTIBIORESIST antibiotic stewardship audit and feedback intervention: a qualitative interview study among high prescribers
    Mehdi El Azrak, Aurélie Bocquier, Cécile Féry +4
    JAC-Antimicrobial ResistancePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals of the Brazilian public health system: PeGASUS study protocol
    Andre Lazzeri Cortez, Mariana Millan Fachi, Icaro Boszczowski +9
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  3. Restrictive vs. liberal blood transfusion strategies in Africa: clinical outcomes, resource stewardship, and future directions
    Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in a multicenter neonatal intensive care unit collaborative: a mixed-methods staff resource needs evaluation
    Cynthia L. Gong, Nabeel Qureshi, Peter Mendel +3
    Journal of PerinatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
  5. Development and temporal validation of a calibrated machine learning model for in-hospital blood culture positivity using routine clinical data
    Tao Huang, Zhenzhen Tan, Longyang Jiang +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{fabre2026implementation,
  title = {{Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Stewardship in 14 Adult ICUs and Wards.}},
  author = {V. Fabre and Y.-J. Hsu and A. Xie and A. B. Salinas and P. Beccar-Varela and V. Martinez and K. O. Degnan and E. B. Gettler and L. Glaser and J. K. Johnson and R. W. Moehring and G. Rodriguez-Nava and J. H. Ryder and A. Ressler and J. L. Salinas and G. M. Schrank and T. R. Talbot and T. C. Van Schooneveld and A. Wasylyshyn and S. E. Cosgrove},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.29.26366841},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366841v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Stewardship in 14 Adult ICUs and Wards.
AU  - V. Fabre
AU  - Y.-J. Hsu
AU  - A. Xie
AU  - A. B. Salinas
AU  - P. Beccar-Varela
AU  - V. Martinez
AU  - K. O. Degnan
AU  - E. B. Gettler
AU  - L. Glaser
AU  - J. K. Johnson
AU  - R. W. Moehring
AU  - G. Rodriguez-Nava
AU  - J. H. Ryder
AU  - A. Ressler
AU  - J. L. Salinas
AU  - G. M. Schrank
AU  - T. R. Talbot
AU  - T. C. Van Schooneveld
AU  - A. Wasylyshyn
AU  - S. E. Cosgrove
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.29.26366841
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366841v1
AB  - Importance: Data are limited on factors associated with successful implementation of diagnostic stewardship interventions to improve blood culture (BCx) ordering in adult inpatients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a quality improvement (QI) initiative to improve BCx ordering and to evaluate factors associated with improved practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a pragmatic QI initiative over a one-year period in seven acute care academic hospitals in the United States. A total of 14 adult units, seven intensive care units (ICUs) and seven wards from each hospital were included. The study was conducted between April st 2022 and June 30th, 2024. Data analysis was performed March 1st to October 25th, 2026. Intervention: The QI included implementation of an evidence-based BCx algorithm with indications for blood cultures, education on the algorithm, and monitoring and feedback of BCx practices. Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was BCx utilization (BCU) 12 months before and after implementation. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we assessed implementation through interviews with QI teams, diaries of QI activities completed by each team, and a survey of frontline providers. Coincidence analysis was used to identify implementation factors associated with improvement in BCU. Results: Four ICUs had significantly lower BCU (~20% reduction), one of them also had a 50% increase in BCx positivity. Greater baseline BCx inappropriateness was associated with significant reduction in BCU. Two wards had a significant increase in BCU, one of which had a concomitant increase in BCx positivity. An additional ward had a 60% increase in BCx positivity despite similar BCU before and after QI implementation. Coincidence analysis identified several factors associated with improved BCU, including perceptions that the algorithm was easy to use and reduced unnecessary repeat BCx, as well as nurse inclusion in educational activities and regular education and feedback on BCx practices. Conclusion: Baseline BCU should inform the design and focus of BCx stewardship initiatives. Effective improvement efforts require multifaceted implementation strategies.
ER  -