Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Scientific Reports

Construct validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the 5 times sit-to-stand test when used with healthy community-living older adults

  • Daniel C. Low
  • Aliah F. Shaheen
  • Liam C. O’Reilly
  • Desmond Denny
  • Carla Harkness Armstrong
  • Andrew Mitchelmore
  • Adam Bibbey
  • Gregory S. Walsh
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Related

  1. Revisiting the Construct Validity of the DASS-21 in Thai Young People: Evidence for a General Distress Factor from a Cross-Sectional Psychometric Study
    Nopporn Vongsirimas, Phunagphet Kesornsamut, Wareerat Thanoi +5
    Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. WardBench: Evaluating Policy Compliance, Dynamic FHIR Consent, and Construct Validity in Clinical EHR Agents
    Vadim Nareyko
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. Assessing the construct validity of cross-national harmonized cognitive assessments using age.
    Sneha Sarah Mani, M Maria Glymour, Eleanor Hayes-Larson +8
    NPJ dementiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  4. Reproducibility is not construct validity: LLM measurement of institutionally situated communication
    Veronika Batzdorfer, Carlo Romano Marcello Alessandro Santagiustina
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  5. Measurement reliability, construct validity, and transparent reporting in original and replication psychological research
    Cas Goos, Marjan Bakker, Jelte M. Wicherts +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPLOS

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{low2026construct,
  title = {{Construct validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the 5 times sit-to-stand test when used with healthy community-living older adults}},
  author = {Daniel C. Low and Aliah F. Shaheen and Liam C. O’Reilly and Desmond Denny and Carla Harkness Armstrong and Andrew Mitchelmore and Adam Bibbey and Gregory S. Walsh},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-75092-0},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75092-0},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Construct validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the 5 times sit-to-stand test when used with healthy community-living older adults
AU  - Daniel C. Low
AU  - Aliah F. Shaheen
AU  - Liam C. O’Reilly
AU  - Desmond Denny
AU  - Carla Harkness Armstrong
AU  - Andrew Mitchelmore
AU  - Adam Bibbey
AU  - Gregory S. Walsh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-75092-0
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75092-0
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -