Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

On divergence related to Riemann--von Mangoldt's explicit formula of the prime-counting function

Abstract

An explicit formula for the prime-counting function π(x), usually attributed to Riemann and von Mangoldt, is prominently stated as the equation π(x)=R(x)−∑ρR(xρ), where the sum runs over all zeros ρ of the Riemann ζ-function, the non-trivial ones being ordered by increasing absolute value of their imaginary parts and counted with multiplicity. This particularly entails the claim that the partial sums over the non-trivial zeros, ΣRT(x):=∑0<|ℑ m(ρ)|≤ T R(xρ) converge as T→∞. Writing Θ:=sup{ℜ e(ρ): ζ(ρ)=0, 0<ℜ e(ρ)<1}, for what has recently been called ``Riemann's constant'', we prove that, for every fixed x>1 and every θ<Θ, the sums ΣRT(x) are not O(Tθ). As a consequence, limsupT→∞|ΣRT(x)|=∞ and ∑ρR(xρ) diverges. We conclude the paper by showing that an adapted, but simpler strategy also gives the analogous result -- and hence divergence -- for the contribution of the trivial zeros to ∑ρR(xρ). In both cases the exponent Θ is proved to be sharp.

Related

  1. Explicit formula for the discrete Laplace transform of the Möbius function, related special functions, and a criterion for the Riemann hypothesis
    Sergey Liflandsky
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. On the counting function of square-full numbers
    Ayyadurai Sankaranarayanan, P. Akhilesh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Explicit height bounds on modular polynomials for the elliptic j-invariant, cube root of j, and Weber modular function f
    Abraham Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Explicit bounds for Dickman's function
    Andreas Weingartner
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Explicit Exponential Sum Estimates and Approximate Functional Equations for the Zeta Function
    Natasha Dhiman, Habiba Kadiri, Emily Quesada-Herrera
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{grobner2026divergence,
  title = {{On divergence related to Riemann--von Mangoldt's explicit formula of the prime-counting function}},
  author = {Harald Grobner},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02713},
  eprint = {2609.02713},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02713},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On divergence related to Riemann--von Mangoldt's explicit formula of the prime-counting function
AU  - Harald Grobner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02713
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02713
AB  - An explicit formula for the prime-counting function π(x), usually attributed to Riemann and von Mangoldt, is prominently stated as the equation π(x)=R(x)−∑_ρR(x^ρ), where the sum runs over all zeros ρ of the Riemann ζ-function, the non-trivial ones being ordered by increasing absolute value of their imaginary parts and counted with multiplicity. This particularly entails the claim that the partial sums over the non-trivial zeros, ΣR_T(x):=∑_0<|ℑ m(ρ)|≤ T R(x^ρ) converge as T→∞. Writing Θ:=sup{ℜ e(ρ): ζ(ρ)=0, 0<ℜ e(ρ)<1}, for what has recently been called ``Riemann's constant'', we prove that, for every fixed x>1 and every θ<Θ, the sums ΣR_T(x) are not O(T^θ). As a consequence, limsup_T→∞|ΣR_T(x)|=∞ and ∑_ρR(x^ρ) diverges. We conclude the paper by showing that an adapted, but simpler strategy also gives the analogous result -- and hence divergence -- for the contribution of the trivial zeros to ∑_ρR(x^ρ). In both cases the exponent Θ is proved to be sharp.
ER  -