Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Collective animal motion: The case of midge swarms

Abstract

Among collective states of animal groups, midge swarms pose several puzzling questions. Their polarization order parameter is very small, and the insects interact only weakly with one another while remaining strongly bound to the swarm. In laboratory studies performed without external perturbations, the correlation length is small. By contrast, field studies reveal strong correlations, scale-free behavior, and power-law scaling of the correlation length, susceptibility, and correlation time. The dynamic correlation function exhibits data collapse only for short times when time is rescaled by the correlation time. Is there a theory that explains these disparate observations? We review several models proposed in the literature and extend our harmonically confined Vicsek model to anisotropic confinement. Within the extended criticality region of the phase diagram, numerical simulations predict elongated swarms and static critical exponents that lie between those of the two-dimensional and isotropic three-dimensional models. These values agree better with those measured in natural swarms. We also calculate probability density functions for both natural and laboratory swarms. Numerical simulations indicate that the laboratory distributions correspond to a different region of parameter space, although some open questions remain.

Versions

Related

  1. Statistical Physics of Fish Collective Motion
    Elena G. de Lamo, M. C. Miguel, R. Pastor-Satorras
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBiological & medical physicsStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Optic flow in the visual system determines interaction force and collective motion
    Susumu Ito, Nariya Uchida
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Finite-Time Orientational Relaxation Restructures Collective Motion in Polar Active Matter
    Rajneesh Kumar, Subhransu Sekhar Mishra, Debasish Chaudhuri
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBiological & medical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Hydrodynamics of perceptual matter: from neural representations to collective motion
    Mohammad Salahshour
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBiological & medical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Interpretable many-body interaction laws for collective motion from few trajectories
    Timon S. Gutleb
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyBiological & medical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bonilla2026collective,
  title = {{Collective animal motion: The case of midge swarms}},
  author = {L. L. Bonilla and R. González-Albaladejo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04046},
  eprint = {2611.04046},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04046},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Collective animal motion: The case of midge swarms
AU  - L. L. Bonilla
AU  - R. González-Albaladejo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04046
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04046
AB  - Among collective states of animal groups, midge swarms pose several puzzling questions. Their polarization order parameter is very small, and the insects interact only weakly with one another while remaining strongly bound to the swarm. In laboratory studies performed without external perturbations, the correlation length is small. By contrast, field studies reveal strong correlations, scale-free behavior, and power-law scaling of the correlation length, susceptibility, and correlation time. The dynamic correlation function exhibits data collapse only for short times when time is rescaled by the correlation time. Is there a theory that explains these disparate observations? We review several models proposed in the literature and extend our harmonically confined Vicsek model to anisotropic confinement. Within the extended criticality region of the phase diagram, numerical simulations predict elongated swarms and static critical exponents that lie between those of the two-dimensional and isotropic three-dimensional models. These values agree better with those measured in natural swarms. We also calculate probability density functions for both natural and laboratory swarms. Numerical simulations indicate that the laboratory distributions correspond to a different region of parameter space, although some open questions remain.
ER  -