Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Midwifery

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on stress and anxiety management in pregnancy: a systematic review

Abstract

Prenatal stress and anxiety are two of the most common mental health concerns during pregnancy and are public health issues. Therefore, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth are recommended. This systematic review aimed to synthesize non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth during pregnancy. It provides an updated and broader synthesis of the available evidence, encompassing diverse populations and intervention approaches. This review followed PRISMA guidance and was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science from 2014 to 2026. PROSPERO registration was obtained before the beginning of the study (CRD42024611014). While previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on one specific criterion, this review included both online and in-person interventions, individual and group-based formats, and both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2 or ROBINS-I. Results were analyzed using a narrative synthesis. Sixty-nine articles were included and classified as mindfulness (26%), psychotherapy (23%), antenatal classes (22%), mindbody interventions (16%), art-therapy interventions (6%), peer-support-based interventions (4%) and attachment-based interventions (3%). This review provides a comprehensive overview of interventions which prevent or manage prenatal stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth. However, heterogeneity across studies made comparisons of effectiveness impossible. Greater standardization is needed in future studies. Specific populations such as coparents and specific medical conditions such as participants with psychiatric comorbidities must be included in future studies. Finally, a reduction in the risk of bias is required to allow findings to inform clinical practice.

Related

  1. Airway management and anaesthetic interventions for children with cleft lip and/or palate undergoing general anaesthesia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharmin Akter Sumi, Kazi Mahzabin Arin, Shahriar Mohd Shams +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textDevelopmental biologyStatisticsPLOSPMC
  2. Past, present, and future of non-pharmacological interventions for autism spectrum disorder: A global bibliometric and thematic analysis (2001-2025).
    Xiaowei Feng, Yu Song, Xuecheng Li +4
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  3. Neuroinflammatory mechanisms and pharmacological advances in autism spectrum disorder: from inflammatory pathways to targeted interventions
    Xinyu Zhang, Huiqin Xue, Chaoyang Zhu +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  4. The NPIS model: a consensus-based framework for evaluating non-pharmacological interventions
    Gregory Ninot, Emeline Descamps, Ghislaine Achalid +15
    Health Research Policy and SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. Shifting social norms, behavioural intentions and opposition to female genital mutilation: Effectiveness of layered community interventions in a high prevalence setting in Kenya
    Dennis Juma Matanda, Martina Mchenga, Stella Muthuri +4
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
BibTeX
@article{sautier2026effectiveness,
  title = {{Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on stress and anxiety management in pregnancy: a systematic review}},
  author = {Julianne Sautier and Cyril Tarquinio and Thierry Cardoso and Christine Rotonda},
  journal = {Midwifery},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.midw.2026.105007},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05804615v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on stress and anxiety management in pregnancy: a systematic review
AU  - Julianne Sautier
AU  - Cyril Tarquinio
AU  - Thierry Cardoso
AU  - Christine Rotonda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Midwifery
DO  - 10.1016/j.midw.2026.105007
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05804615v1
AB  - Prenatal stress and anxiety are two of the most common mental health concerns during pregnancy and are public health issues. Therefore, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth are recommended. This systematic review aimed to synthesize non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth during pregnancy. It provides an updated and broader synthesis of the available evidence, encompassing diverse populations and intervention approaches. This review followed PRISMA guidance and was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science from 2014 to 2026. PROSPERO registration was obtained before the beginning of the study (CRD42024611014). While previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on one specific criterion, this review included both online and in-person interventions, individual and group-based formats, and both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2 or ROBINS-I. Results were analyzed using a narrative synthesis. Sixty-nine articles were included and classified as mindfulness (26%), psychotherapy (23%), antenatal classes (22%), mindbody interventions (16%), art-therapy interventions (6%), peer-support-based interventions (4%) and attachment-based interventions (3%). This review provides a comprehensive overview of interventions which prevent or manage prenatal stress, anxiety and fear of childbirth. However, heterogeneity across studies made comparisons of effectiveness impossible. Greater standardization is needed in future studies. Specific populations such as coparents and specific medical conditions such as participants with psychiatric comorbidities must be included in future studies. Finally, a reduction in the risk of bias is required to allow findings to inform clinical practice.
SN  - 0266-6138
ER  -