Resting-state EEG spectral characteristics before and after a single auditory integration training session in children with autism spectrum disorder
4 affiliations
- 1Key Laboratory of Language and Cognitive Science (Ministry of Education), Beijing Language and Culture University
- 2Institute of Life and Health Sciences, Beijing Language and Culture University
- 3KeyLaboratory of Language and Cognitive Science (Ministry of Education), Beijing Language and Culture University
- 4College of International Education, Minzu University of China
Abstract
Background: Resting-state EEG characteristics may differ between autistic and non-autistic children. Conventional band power mixes periodic and broadband activity; spectral parameterization separates periodic peaks from the aperiodic background. Auditory integration training (AIT) is used as a complementary intervention, but its immediate neurophysiological and clinical effects remain uncertain. We examined baseline EEG differences and pre-post changes around one AIT session.
Methods: Twenty children with ASD and 15 typically developing (TD) children aged 6–8 years participated. Resting EEG was recorded in ASD before and immediately after a 30-min Berard AIT session. Sixteen ASD participants had usable paired recordings. Relative power was measured in five bands. Periodic and aperiodic components were parameterized with FOOOF. Sensitivity analyses varied R-squared threshold, aperiodic mode, fitting settings, channel aggregation.
Results: At baseline, ASD showed higher delta and lower theta, alpha, and beta relative power than TD. After modeling peaks, aperiodic exponent and offset did not differ between groups. Among 16 paired ASD recordings, delta decreased and beta/gamma increased post-session; paired tests of exponent and offset were nonsignificant. Five of 20 baseline and seven of 18 post-session recordings had R-squared<0.90, but sensitivity analyses did not change null aperiodic findings.
Conclusions: This uncontrolled pilot study found immediate pre-post band-power differences around one Berard AIT session but no significant FOOOF-derived aperiodic changes. Findings are hypothesis-generating and cannot distinguish AIT-specific effects from repeated measurement, arousal, expectancy, or generic auditory stimulation. Variable fit quality and small sample limit precision; controlled longitudinal studies are needed.
Related
- Auditory object identification and localisation training for hyperacusis: preliminary effects on sound tolerance and noise acceptance
- Large cranial windows distort auditory cortical maps and degrade feature integration in secondary auditory cortex
- Perceptual integration of multisensory haptic, visual, and auditory feedback for roughness discrimination in augmented reality
- The human hippocampus supports auditory coding and multisensory integration
- Temporal Auditory Resolution, Timed Motor Responses to Auditory Cues, and Phonological Processing in Swedish Children with Cochlear Implants and Normal Hearing Peers.
BibTeX
@article{wang2026restingstate,
title = {{Resting-state EEG spectral characteristics before and after a single auditory integration training session in children with autism spectrum disorder}},
author = {Yao Wang and Yiying You and Xiaowen Wu and Haozhe Chu and Chong Lu},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1948611},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1948611/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Resting-state EEG spectral characteristics before and after a single auditory integration training session in children with autism spectrum disorder
AU - Yao Wang
AU - Yiying You
AU - Xiaowen Wu
AU - Haozhe Chu
AU - Chong Lu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1948611
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1948611/full
AB - Background: Resting-state EEG characteristics may differ between autistic and non-autistic children. Conventional band power mixes periodic and broadband activity; spectral parameterization separates periodic peaks from the aperiodic background. Auditory integration training (AIT) is used as a complementary intervention, but its immediate neurophysiological and clinical effects remain uncertain. We examined baseline EEG differences and pre-post changes around one AIT session. Methods: Twenty children with ASD and 15 typically developing (TD) children aged 6–8 years participated. Resting EEG was recorded in ASD before and immediately after a 30-min Berard AIT session. Sixteen ASD participants had usable paired recordings. Relative power was measured in five bands. Periodic and aperiodic components were parameterized with FOOOF. Sensitivity analyses varied R-squared threshold, aperiodic mode, fitting settings, channel aggregation. Results: At baseline, ASD showed higher delta and lower theta, alpha, and beta relative power than TD. After modeling peaks, aperiodic exponent and offset did not differ between groups. Among 16 paired ASD recordings, delta decreased and beta/gamma increased post-session; paired tests of exponent and offset were nonsignificant. Five of 20 baseline and seven of 18 post-session recordings had R-squared<0.90, but sensitivity analyses did not change null aperiodic findings. Conclusions: This uncontrolled pilot study found immediate pre-post band-power differences around one Berard AIT session but no significant FOOOF-derived aperiodic changes. Findings are hypothesis-generating and cannot distinguish AIT-specific effects from repeated measurement, arousal, expectancy, or generic auditory stimulation. Variable fit quality and small sample limit precision; controlled longitudinal studies are needed.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -