Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Toward a New Paradigm for Renewable Biopolymer Selection: A Structure–Processing–Architecture–Property–Scalability Framework (Alginate, Cellulose, Lignin, Chitosan, and Starch)

  1. 1Department of Industrial Biotechnology
  2. 2KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  3. 3GreenMateria Novatech

Abstract

Renewable biopolymers are increasingly explored as alternatives to fossil-derived materials, yet bio-based origin alone does not determine performance or commercial relevance. This review compares alginate, lignin, cellulose, chitosan, and starch through an integrated structure–processing–architecture–property–scalability framework. Molecular functionality — carboxylate-rich, aromatic, hydroxyl-rich, amine-rich, crystalline, branched, and charged structures — is linked to processing pathways and to the resulting coatings, fibers, crosslinked networks, porous structures, carbon materials, and composite architectures. A dedicated cross-cutting discussion then argues why the three comparison axes dominant in the existing literature, chemistry, biodegradability, and application category, each fail, on their own, to predict which material and processing combination is actually useful for a given job, and what a comparison needs to include instead. The review closes with application-specific design rules to support material and processing selection for sustainable packaging, thermal insulation, water purification and separations, CO2 capture, energy storage and electrocatalysis, biomedical scaffolds and controlled release, and construction materials.

Related

  1. A Decision-Making Framework for Renewable Biopolymer Selection: Integrating Structure, Processing, Properties, Scalability, Techno-Economics, and Life-Cycle Assessment
    Parastou Kharazmi
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  2. Crosslinking-controlled biopolymer biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: network chemistry, processing, and mechanistically informed validation
    Stefano Bellucci
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersPMC
  3. Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers for Biomedical Interfaces: Polymer Selection, Architecture, Bioactivation, and Translational Challenges
    Gianluca Ciarleglio, Maria Gabriella Santonicola
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  4. Collapsible Soil Stabilization Using a Novel Crosslinked Biopolymer Binder: A Multiscale Evaluation
    Hadi Fatehi, Delaram Bahrampour, Mahsa Salehi Nia +2
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  5. Applied Design Strategies for MOFs in CO 2 Capture: Balancing Stability, Selectivity, and Scalability
    Richa Vinayak
    ChemistrySelectPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedInorganic & organometallic chemistryOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{kharazmi2026toward,
  title = {{Toward a New Paradigm for Renewable Biopolymer Selection: A Structure–Processing–Architecture–Property–Scalability Framework (Alginate, Cellulose, Lignin, Chitosan, and Starch)}},
  author = {Parastou Kharazmi},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15009975/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009975/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Toward a New Paradigm for Renewable Biopolymer Selection: A Structure–Processing–Architecture–Property–Scalability Framework (Alginate, Cellulose, Lignin, Chitosan, and Starch)
AU  - Parastou Kharazmi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15009975/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009975/v1
AB  - Renewable biopolymers are increasingly explored as alternatives to fossil-derived materials, yet bio-based origin alone does not determine performance or commercial relevance. This review compares alginate, lignin, cellulose, chitosan, and starch through an integrated structure–processing–architecture–property–scalability framework. Molecular functionality — carboxylate-rich, aromatic, hydroxyl-rich, amine-rich, crystalline, branched, and charged structures — is linked to processing pathways and to the resulting coatings, fibers, crosslinked networks, porous structures, carbon materials, and composite architectures. A dedicated cross-cutting discussion then argues why the three comparison axes dominant in the existing literature, chemistry, biodegradability, and application category, each fail, on their own, to predict which material and processing combination is actually useful for a given job, and what a comparison needs to include instead. The review closes with application-specific design rules to support material and processing selection for sustainable packaging, thermal insulation, water purification and separations, CO2 capture, energy storage and electrocatalysis, biomedical scaffolds and controlled release, and construction materials.
ER  -