Return on investment in workplace health prevention and promotion: a systematic review (2003-2024).
- 1Department of Occupational Health, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. [email protected].
- 2Department of Occupational Medicine, Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Background
Workplace health prevention and promotion (WHP) programs represent a strategic investment in human capital. Despite a growing body of evidence, synthesized economic evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review addresses identified gaps in the literature by synthesizing economic outcomes from diverse WHP interventions globally.Objective
To synthesize evidence on the return on investment (ROI) of workplace health prevention and promotion interventions across diverse settings and intervention types (2003-2024).Methods
Systematic search across four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) covering January 2003 to November 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 1,247 records were identified; after removing 26 duplicates, 1,221 records were screened. Following full-text assessment, 112 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study reporting quality was assessed using the CHEERS 2022 checklist as a reporting quality tool. Economic outcomes included cost-benefit ratios, ROI, cost-effectiveness, absenteeism, and presenteeism.Results
Of 112 included studies, 89% reported positive cost-benefit ratios (> 1:1). The median ROI across all intervention types was 1:3.1 (95% CI: 1:2.7-1:3.6). Ergonomic interventions showed the highest benefit-cost ratios (median 5.2:1), followed by smoking cessation (median 5.1:1). ROI increased with program duration (R²=0.67, p < 0.001).Conclusions
Workplace health investments generate consistent positive economic returns. However, results should be interpreted with caution given the substantial methodological heterogeneity, geographic concentration in high-income countries, and the predominance of employer-perspective analyses.Clinical trial number
not applicable.
Related
- Do investments in sport pay off: a systematic review and exploratory quasi meta-analysis of social return on investment in sport and physical activity
- Verbal de-escalation techniques for the prevention and management of workplace violence in healthcare: a systematic review
- Research trends of workplace health promotion in Japan: a scoping review
- Health prevention research in France: Increasing investment is a priority, rethinking targets is equally crucial
- Social Return on Investment evaluation of the ‘Art of Life’ project
BibTeX
@article{llamas2026return,
title = {{Return on investment in workplace health prevention and promotion: a systematic review (2003-2024).}},
author = {Pablo Llamas and María Isabel Martín Estévez},
journal = {BMC public health},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28454-2},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43009872},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Return on investment in workplace health prevention and promotion: a systematic review (2003-2024).
AU - Pablo Llamas
AU - María Isabel Martín Estévez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - BMC public health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-28454-2
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/43009872
AB - Background Workplace health prevention and promotion (WHP) programs represent a strategic investment in human capital. Despite a growing body of evidence, synthesized economic evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review addresses identified gaps in the literature by synthesizing economic outcomes from diverse WHP interventions globally.Objective To synthesize evidence on the return on investment (ROI) of workplace health prevention and promotion interventions across diverse settings and intervention types (2003-2024).Methods Systematic search across four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) covering January 2003 to November 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 1,247 records were identified; after removing 26 duplicates, 1,221 records were screened. Following full-text assessment, 112 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study reporting quality was assessed using the CHEERS 2022 checklist as a reporting quality tool. Economic outcomes included cost-benefit ratios, ROI, cost-effectiveness, absenteeism, and presenteeism.Results Of 112 included studies, 89% reported positive cost-benefit ratios (> 1:1). The median ROI across all intervention types was 1:3.1 (95% CI: 1:2.7-1:3.6). Ergonomic interventions showed the highest benefit-cost ratios (median 5.2:1), followed by smoking cessation (median 5.1:1). ROI increased with program duration (R²=0.67, p < 0.001).Conclusions Workplace health investments generate consistent positive economic returns. However, results should be interpreted with caution given the substantial methodological heterogeneity, geographic concentration in high-income countries, and the predominance of employer-perspective analyses.Clinical trial number not applicable.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -