Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

The Equivariance Criterion in a Linear Model for Random-X Cases

Abstract

Equivariance is increasingly used in machine learning and statistics, often without systematic justification. In a companion article, the equivariance criterion was applied to the normal linear model with a fixed design matrix (fixed-X), yielding the minimum risk equivariant (MRE) estimators of the coefficient vector and of the condensed diagonal covariance matrix under a multivariate invariant location--scale group. We extend these results to the random-X case, with covariates sampled from a population. The extension hinges on a distinction vacuous for fixed-X but fundamental for random-X: whether risk and unbiasedness are evaluated conditionally on the realized design or after averaging over the design distribution. Under conditional evaluation, the fixed-X group applies given X: least squares remains the best equivariant estimator of the coefficient vector, and the MRE estimators of the population variances keep their fixed-X forms with population sizes at the realized design. Under absolute evaluation with an i.i.d.\ design, the picture changes qualitatively: the natural scale group acting jointly on (Y,X) fixes the coefficient vector, the induced parameter-space action is intransitive, equivariant risks are constant only along orbits indexed by the signal-to-noise ratio ρ=|β|2/σ2, and no uniformly minimum risk equivariant estimator exists. In the scalar case the optimal equivariant weight is the oracle shrinkage factor w*(ρ)=ρ/(ρ+E[T−1]), with least squares recovered as the infinite-signal limit ρ→∞---explaining and refining the known failure of the Gauss--Markov theorem with random regressors. For a centered design under location--scale transformations, least squares remains optimal within the natural invariant-contrast class, and the MRE estimator S2/(n−p+2) of the error variance is valid under both modes.

Related

  1. Two-sided estimates for two-point local time tails of branching random walks: a Green function criterion
    Shuwen Lai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  2. A linear independence criterion for p-adic Hurwitz zeta values at odd integers
    Makoto Kawashima, Anthony Poëls
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. The higher-dimensional Shepp problem: an exact criterion for random ball coverings of tori
    Yechi Zhou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  4. Smooth Information Criterion for Variable Selection in Generalised Linear Models
    Andrew McInerney
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. On the Convergence of the Mesh-Free Discretization of a Non-Linear Bond-Based Peridynamic Model with a Bond-Breakage Criterion
    Lukas Pflug, Michael Stingl, Max Zetzmann
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026equivariance,
  title = {{The Equivariance Criterion in a Linear Model for Random-$X$ Cases}},
  author = {Zhengyang Zhang and Haojin Zhou},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16897},
  eprint = {2609.16897},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16897},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Equivariance Criterion in a Linear Model for Random-X Cases
AU  - Zhengyang Zhang
AU  - Haojin Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16897
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16897
AB  - Equivariance is increasingly used in machine learning and statistics, often without systematic justification. In a companion article, the equivariance criterion was applied to the normal linear model with a fixed design matrix (fixed-X), yielding the minimum risk equivariant (MRE) estimators of the coefficient vector and of the condensed diagonal covariance matrix under a multivariate invariant location--scale group. We extend these results to the random-X case, with covariates sampled from a population. The extension hinges on a distinction vacuous for fixed-X but fundamental for random-X: whether risk and unbiasedness are evaluated conditionally on the realized design or after averaging over the design distribution. Under conditional evaluation, the fixed-X group applies given X: least squares remains the best equivariant estimator of the coefficient vector, and the MRE estimators of the population variances keep their fixed-X forms with population sizes at the realized design. Under absolute evaluation with an i.i.d.\ design, the picture changes qualitatively: the natural scale group acting jointly on (Y,X) fixes the coefficient vector, the induced parameter-space action is intransitive, equivariant risks are constant only along orbits indexed by the signal-to-noise ratio ρ=|β|^2/σ^2, and no uniformly minimum risk equivariant estimator exists. In the scalar case the optimal equivariant weight is the oracle shrinkage factor w^*(ρ)=ρ/(ρ+E[T^−1]), with least squares recovered as the infinite-signal limit ρ→∞---explaining and refining the known failure of the Gauss--Markov theorem with random regressors. For a centered design under location--scale transformations, least squares remains optimal within the natural invariant-contrast class, and the MRE estimator S^2/(n−p+2) of the error variance is valid under both modes.
ER  -