The effects of physical activity interventions on stress-related psychological and physiological outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1School of Physical Education and Health, Linyi University, Linyi, China
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of physical activity interventions on stress-related psychological and physiological outcomes in children and adolescents, including direct or subjective stress-related measures, related psychological health outcomes, and physiological indicators potentially associated with stress regulation.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched from database inception to September 8, 2026. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, while the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used for non-randomized intervention studies; the certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, with pooled effects expressed as standardized mean differences (Hedges’ g) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate for each outcome.
Results: A total of 35 controlled studies were included, comprising 32 randomized controlled trials and 3 non-randomized intervention studies. Primary pooled estimates favored lower perceived/general stress (Hedges’ g = −0.28, 95% CI: −0.48 to −0.08, p = 0.006, I2 = 49.9%, τ2 = 0.030) and depressive symptoms (Hedges’ g = −0.53, 95% CI: −1.04 to −0.02, p = 0.041, I2 = 94.8%, τ2 = 0.809), with statistically significant pooled differences also observed for resting systolic blood pressure, resting diastolic blood pressure, and HRV-LF/HF. No statistically significant effects were observed for the remaining psychological or physiological outcomes. Certainty was low for systolic blood pressure and very low for the other statistically significant outcomes. Depressive symptom, diastolic blood pressure, and LF/HF findings were sensitive to the inferential method.
Conclusion: Low-certainty evidence suggested a possible small reduction in resting systolic blood pressure; possible reductions in other outcomes were supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Overall, certainty was very low for most outcomes, and the findings should be regarded as tentative. Several findings were sensitive to analytical choices or individual studies. The non-specificity of related symptoms and resting physiological measures limits inferences about stress regulation. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted.
Systematic review registration: The study was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database on September 7, 2026 (registration number: CRD420261499943).
Related
- School-based mindfulness interventions in children and adolescents: an umbrella review of systematic reviews, with implications for physical education
- Effectiveness of physical, psychological, and alternative interventions for post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review.
- Effects of insomnia-focused psychological and behavioral interventions on depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Sports App-Based Interventions on Physical Fitness Outcomes among Adolescents and University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Combined nutrition and physical activity education for early adolescents with malnutrition: A systematic review of overweight interventions and the undernutrition evidence gap
BibTeX
@article{chen2026effects,
title = {{The effects of physical activity interventions on stress-related psychological and physiological outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {Liang Chen and Jia Zhang and Bo Wang and Zhongling Gao},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2000159},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2000159},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The effects of physical activity interventions on stress-related psychological and physiological outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Liang Chen
AU - Jia Zhang
AU - Bo Wang
AU - Zhongling Gao
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2000159
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2000159
AB - Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of physical activity interventions on stress-related psychological and physiological outcomes in children and adolescents, including direct or subjective stress-related measures, related psychological health outcomes, and physiological indicators potentially associated with stress regulation. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched from database inception to September 8, 2026. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, while the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used for non-randomized intervention studies; the certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, with pooled effects expressed as standardized mean differences (Hedges’ g) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate for each outcome. Results: A total of 35 controlled studies were included, comprising 32 randomized controlled trials and 3 non-randomized intervention studies. Primary pooled estimates favored lower perceived/general stress (Hedges’ g = −0.28, 95% CI: −0.48 to −0.08, p = 0.006, I2 = 49.9%, τ2 = 0.030) and depressive symptoms (Hedges’ g = −0.53, 95% CI: −1.04 to −0.02, p = 0.041, I2 = 94.8%, τ2 = 0.809), with statistically significant pooled differences also observed for resting systolic blood pressure, resting diastolic blood pressure, and HRV-LF/HF. No statistically significant effects were observed for the remaining psychological or physiological outcomes. Certainty was low for systolic blood pressure and very low for the other statistically significant outcomes. Depressive symptom, diastolic blood pressure, and LF/HF findings were sensitive to the inferential method. Conclusion: Low-certainty evidence suggested a possible small reduction in resting systolic blood pressure; possible reductions in other outcomes were supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Overall, certainty was very low for most outcomes, and the findings should be regarded as tentative. Several findings were sensitive to analytical choices or individual studies. The non-specificity of related symptoms and resting physiological measures limits inferences about stress regulation. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted. Systematic review registration: The study was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database on September 7, 2026 (registration number: CRD420261499943).
SN - 1664-1078
ER -