Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Incidental Findings on Large-Field-of-View Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans: Prevalence, Anatomical Distribution and Predictors of Clinical Relevance in a Retrospective Analysis of 203 Patients.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Werner Forßmann Krankenhaus, Rudolph-Breitscheid-Str. 100, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany.
  2. 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
  3. 3Department of Periodontology, Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
  4. 4Center for Data Science, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Schicklerstr. 5, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, anatomical distribution, and clinical relevance of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and to identify patient-related predictors associated with their occurrence. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 203 patients in a single center who were undergoing CBCT (June 2020-January 2022; field of view: 11 cm × 10 cm) for routine diagnostics or preoperative planning. Findings were categorized by clinical relevance, mapped relative to the primary region of interest (ROI), and analyzed via logistic/Poisson regression for demographic/clinical associations. Results: Incidental findings occurred in 79.3% of the patients, with 89.6% outside the ROI. Dental/sinusoidal airway findings were the most common. Increasing age (OR = 1.11; p < 0.001) and reduced dentition compared to full dentition (>24 teeth vs full dentition IRR = 1.91; p < 0.001 and ≤24 teeth vs full dentition IRR = 2.17; p < 0.001) were significant predictors for relevant incidental findings. Other clinical factors showed elevated but non-significant risk estimates. CBCT indication did not predict the occurrence of incidental findings. Conclusions: Incidental findings in large-volume CBCT scans are common and frequently located outside the primary ROI. Age and reduced dentition were identified as potential predictors. While these findings may support a more individualized approach to CBCT volume selection, any expansion of the field of view must adhere to established radiation protection principles. Prospective studies are needed to further define risk-adapted imaging strategies.

Related

  1. Incidental pulmonary nodules detected on computed tomography pulmonary angiography: prevalence and malignancy outcomes from a Thai tertiary-care center
    Korkate Taikerd, Thitiwat Sriprasart
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Mandibular Canal Morphometry and Anatomical Variations Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a North Indian Population: A Retrospective Study
    Nisha Dua, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Swarnika Jain +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. An 11-Year Comprehensive Retrospective Study on the Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Women and Men in Türkiye and Northern Cyprus
    Tutku Taskinoglu, Zafer Yazici, Seda Gozel +4
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Anatomical distribution of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study with finite-element analysis of calf muscle-vein mechanics
    Xin Hong, Jia Hou, Xingyu Hong
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Comprehensive Cardiac Computed Tomography for Anatomical Assessment, Functional Analysis, and Myocardial Tissue Characterization in a Patient With Coronary Anomaly and Cardiac Amyloidosis
    Hiroyuki Takaoka, Noriko Suzuki-Eguchi, Ken Kato +9
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{heidepriem2026incidental,
  title = {{Incidental Findings on Large-Field-of-View Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans: Prevalence, Anatomical Distribution and Predictors of Clinical Relevance in a Retrospective Analysis of 203 Patients.}},
  author = {Oliver Heidepriem and Saskia Preissner and Meikel Vesper and Susanne Nahles and Max Heiland and Sameh Attia and Kirstin Vach and Moritz Hertel},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193152},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882307},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Incidental Findings on Large-Field-of-View Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans: Prevalence, Anatomical Distribution and Predictors of Clinical Relevance in a Retrospective Analysis of 203 Patients.
AU  - Oliver Heidepriem
AU  - Saskia Preissner
AU  - Meikel Vesper
AU  - Susanne Nahles
AU  - Max Heiland
AU  - Sameh Attia
AU  - Kirstin Vach
AU  - Moritz Hertel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193152
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882307
AB  - Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, anatomical distribution, and clinical relevance of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and to identify patient-related predictors associated with their occurrence. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 203 patients in a single center who were undergoing CBCT (June 2020-January 2022; field of view: 11 cm × 10 cm) for routine diagnostics or preoperative planning. Findings were categorized by clinical relevance, mapped relative to the primary region of interest (ROI), and analyzed via logistic/Poisson regression for demographic/clinical associations. Results: Incidental findings occurred in 79.3% of the patients, with 89.6% outside the ROI. Dental/sinusoidal airway findings were the most common. Increasing age (OR = 1.11; p < 0.001) and reduced dentition compared to full dentition (>24 teeth vs full dentition IRR = 1.91; p < 0.001 and ≤24 teeth vs full dentition IRR = 2.17; p < 0.001) were significant predictors for relevant incidental findings. Other clinical factors showed elevated but non-significant risk estimates. CBCT indication did not predict the occurrence of incidental findings. Conclusions: Incidental findings in large-volume CBCT scans are common and frequently located outside the primary ROI. Age and reduced dentition were identified as potential predictors. While these findings may support a more individualized approach to CBCT volume selection, any expansion of the field of view must adhere to established radiation protection principles. Prospective studies are needed to further define risk-adapted imaging strategies.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -