Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Occurrence of influenza antivirals and resistance development in influenza A viruses in aquatic environments: A risk assessment

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Global health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Natural Science, Design and Sustainable Development, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  4. 4Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Influenza antivirals (IAs) have been detected in aquatic environments inhabited by dabbling ducks, the natural reservoir of influenza A virus (IAV), raising concerns about the development of antiviral resistance. Because novel human IAV strains often contain genetic material of avian origin, this may contribute to resistance in viruses with pandemic potential. This study aimed to assess the environmental risk posed by four IAs—oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), zanamivir (ZA), peramivir (PE), and amantadine (AM)—based on their potential for environmental release, environmental stability, and induction of antiviral resistance. The assessment combined data from new experiments on (1) environmental release and (2) environmental stability of PE, AM, OC, and ZA, with results from previously published in vivo experiments in a mallard model examining (3) resistance development to OC, PE, and ZA in IAV. The risk of environmental release was assessed as high for OC, AM, and PE, and very high for ZA. Environmental stability ranged from very high to low, in the order PE > AM > OC > ZA. The potential to induce resistance in IAV was similar for PE and OC, and lower for ZA. Overall, the environmental risk ranking was PE > OC > ZA, with PE and OC posing the highest risks. Prudent use of IAs requires balancing the risk of resistance development against clinical benefit. In cases of complicated influenza or in high-risk patient groups, the clinical benefits are substantial and justify IA use. However, in uncomplicated influenza among otherwise healthy individuals, the clinical benefit is limited, and the risk of resistance development should be carefully considered. Among the evaluated antivirals, ZA showed the lowest environmental risk and should be preferred when feasible.

Related

  1. Microclimate characteristics, temporal dynamics of soil bacterial communities, and potential co-occurrence network differences between greenhouse and open-field cultivation environments
    Lirong Xue, Yonglin Chen, Yihui Zhong +1
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. Predictors Recover Most of the Metagenomic Signal for Antibiotic Resistance Gene Occurrence: A Cross-City Test of Geographic Transferability in Urban Wastewater
    S. Falahati Khanaman, B. D. Shrestha Gurung, S. Aryal +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. Occurrence and characterization of biofilm-forming and multidrug-resistant Shigella spp. in retail poultry meat and associated environments in Sylhet, Bangladesh
    Suchona Aktera, Md. Hasan Alib, Hemayet Hossainc +8
    Poultry SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPMC
  4. Identification of potential donors for bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) resistance in blackgram through multi-environments phenotyping and biochemical profiling
    Shailja Jaiswal, Rakesh Pandey, Ajit Pandey +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  5. Beyond prediction accuracy by integrating GWAASB into wheat stability assessment across environments in Saudi Arabia
    Omar Dahrog, Abdullah Al-Doss, Ibrahim Al-Ashkar
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Plant biologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lindstrom2026occurrence,
  title = {{Occurrence of influenza antivirals and resistance development in influenza A viruses in aquatic environments: A risk assessment}},
  author = {Hanna Söderström Lindström and Sara H. Norström and Chaojun Tang and Richard H. Lindberg and Josef D. Järhult},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358447},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358447},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Occurrence of influenza antivirals and resistance development in influenza A viruses in aquatic environments: A risk assessment
AU  - Hanna Söderström Lindström
AU  - Sara H. Norström
AU  - Chaojun Tang
AU  - Richard H. Lindberg
AU  - Josef D. Järhult
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358447
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358447
AB  - Influenza antivirals (IAs) have been detected in aquatic environments inhabited by dabbling ducks, the natural reservoir of influenza A virus (IAV), raising concerns about the development of antiviral resistance. Because novel human IAV strains often contain genetic material of avian origin, this may contribute to resistance in viruses with pandemic potential. This study aimed to assess the environmental risk posed by four IAs—oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), zanamivir (ZA), peramivir (PE), and amantadine (AM)—based on their potential for environmental release, environmental stability, and induction of antiviral resistance. The assessment combined data from new experiments on (1) environmental release and (2) environmental stability of PE, AM, OC, and ZA, with results from previously published in vivo experiments in a mallard model examining (3) resistance development to OC, PE, and ZA in IAV. The risk of environmental release was assessed as high for OC, AM, and PE, and very high for ZA. Environmental stability ranged from very high to low, in the order PE > AM > OC > ZA. The potential to induce resistance in IAV was similar for PE and OC, and lower for ZA. Overall, the environmental risk ranking was PE > OC > ZA, with PE and OC posing the highest risks. Prudent use of IAs requires balancing the risk of resistance development against clinical benefit. In cases of complicated influenza or in high-risk patient groups, the clinical benefits are substantial and justify IA use. However, in uncomplicated influenza among otherwise healthy individuals, the clinical benefit is limited, and the risk of resistance development should be carefully considered. Among the evaluated antivirals, ZA showed the lowest environmental risk and should be preferred when feasible.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -