Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Infinitary provability logic

Abstract

Gödel-Löb provability logic GL is a propositional modal system that on one hand enjoys completeness with respect to conversely well-founded Kripke frames and on the other hand captures all modal principles about PA-provability that are provable in PA itself. In the present paper we carry out an initial investigation into the question of what the infinitary counterpart of GL is. We develop a non-well-founded deep inference proof system dgla for the modal language with at most countably infinite conjunctions and disjunctions. We show that the calculus is sound and complete for well-founded transitive Kripke frames. Using Kripke-Platek set theory we develop an interpretation of the infinitary modal language in terms of infinitary provability over admissible sets. Then we show that a natural Hilber-style variant of infinitary GL is sound for this interpretation. We leave open, however, the question if dgla proves any additional theorems in comparison with the Hilbert-style calculus. Nevertheless, under certain conditions we do show that the infinitary provability logic arising from certain admissible sets lies between the set of theorems of the Hilbert-style calculus and the non-well-founded deep inference system.

Related

  1. Mechanizing Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems and Provability Logic
    Shogo Saitou, Mashu Noguchi
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  2. Completeness of the Gödel--Löb Provability Logic for Finite Derived Ordinal Topologies
    Mohammad Golshani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  3. Omitting Types for Infinitary Real-Valued Logic: A Topological Perspective
    Olivia Aubone, Eduardo Dueñez, José Iovino
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  4. Infinitary real-valued logic and a refinement of the Kochen-Specker theorem
    Olivia Aubone, José Iovino
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  5. Infinitary positive existential normal forms for modules
    Rishi Banerjee
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textLogic & foundationsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mojtahedi2026infinitary,
  title = {{Infinitary provability logic}},
  author = {Mojtaba Mojtahedi and Fedor Pakhomov and Giovanni Soldà},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.24795},
  eprint = {2609.24795},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24795},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Infinitary provability logic
AU  - Mojtaba Mojtahedi
AU  - Fedor Pakhomov
AU  - Giovanni Soldà
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.24795
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24795
AB  - Gödel-Löb provability logic GL is a propositional modal system that on one hand enjoys completeness with respect to conversely well-founded Kripke frames and on the other hand captures all modal principles about PA-provability that are provable in PA itself. In the present paper we carry out an initial investigation into the question of what the infinitary counterpart of GL is. We develop a non-well-founded deep inference proof system dgla for the modal language with at most countably infinite conjunctions and disjunctions. We show that the calculus is sound and complete for well-founded transitive Kripke frames. Using Kripke-Platek set theory we develop an interpretation of the infinitary modal language in terms of infinitary provability over admissible sets. Then we show that a natural Hilber-style variant of infinitary GL is sound for this interpretation. We leave open, however, the question if dgla proves any additional theorems in comparison with the Hilbert-style calculus. Nevertheless, under certain conditions we do show that the infinitary provability logic arising from certain admissible sets lies between the set of theorems of the Hilbert-style calculus and the non-well-founded deep inference system.
ER  -