Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,782 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Irish Journal of Medical Science

An Irish experience of robotic adrenalectomy: Transitioning from open to robotic surgery

  1. 1Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77 Ireland
  2. 2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive techniques have become the gold-standard for the surgical management of the majority adrenal pathologies. No consensus exists over the benefit of robotic over laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The aim of the study was to analyse the authors’ experience of adrenalectomy with emphasis on its transition to robotic approaches.

Methods: Retrospective data were collated from a prospectively maintained database of all consecutive adult patients undergoing adrenalectomy at the study centre between 1st January 2015 to 1st June 2025.

Results: 61 adrenalectomies were included in the study at a median patient age of 54 years (IQR 43—67). 34% of these were for phaeochromocytoma. Open approaches prevailed at the start of the study but over-all, half the cases were performed robotically. Mean operative time reduced over the study period from 264 min in 2015 to 108 min in 2025. Median length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (IQR 4—7).

Conclusion: This case series reflects a change in approach to adrenalectomy. The 10-year period demonstrated a marked transition to robotic adrenalectomy, paralleled by rising case volumes and significant improvements in length of stay, operative time, and blood loss. While the overall improvements are likely multifactorial (learning curve effects, increasing institutional experience, evolving case selection, and rising case volumes)—this study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of robotic adrenalectomy.

Related

  1. Early experience with the SHURUI single port serpentine arm robotic system with an auxiliary port in gastrointestinal surgery: a descriptive case series
    Dipesh Kumar Yadav, Yuncheng Luo, Zhangwei Yang +6
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. Modified dual-portal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery using a Japanese-manufactured robotic platform
    JTCVS techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Robotic-assisted beating heart surgery: a comprehensive review
    Omar Abuzied, Momen Abayazid
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Longitudinal Functional Outcomes After Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Single‐Center Study
    Kazufumi Obata, Kenji Okami, Kaori Zenba +6
    Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Comparative efficacy of uniportal and multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{walsh2026irish,
  title = {{An Irish experience of robotic adrenalectomy: Transitioning from open to robotic surgery}},
  author = {R. Walsh and J. Walsh and N. Hardy and T. Harding and A. Pathanki and G. McEntee and J. Conneely},
  journal = {Irish Journal of Medical Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1007/s11845-026-04428-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04428-6},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An Irish experience of robotic adrenalectomy: Transitioning from open to robotic surgery
AU  - R. Walsh
AU  - J. Walsh
AU  - N. Hardy
AU  - T. Harding
AU  - A. Pathanki
AU  - G. McEntee
AU  - J. Conneely
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/26
JO  - Irish Journal of Medical Science
DO  - 10.1007/s11845-026-04428-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04428-6
AB  - Background: Minimally invasive techniques have become the gold-standard for the surgical management of the majority adrenal pathologies. No consensus exists over the benefit of robotic over laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The aim of the study was to analyse the authors’ experience of adrenalectomy with emphasis on its transition to robotic approaches.  Methods: Retrospective data were collated from a prospectively maintained database of all consecutive adult patients undergoing adrenalectomy at the study centre between 1st January 2015 to 1st June 2025.  Results: 61 adrenalectomies were included in the study at a median patient age of 54 years (IQR 43—67). 34% of these were for phaeochromocytoma. Open approaches prevailed at the start of the study but over-all, half the cases were performed robotically. Mean operative time reduced over the study period from 264 min in 2015 to 108 min in 2025. Median length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (IQR 4—7).  Conclusion: This case series reflects a change in approach to adrenalectomy. The 10-year period demonstrated a marked transition to robotic adrenalectomy, paralleled by rising case volumes and significant improvements in length of stay, operative time, and blood loss. While the overall improvements are likely multifactorial (learning curve effects, increasing institutional experience, evolving case selection, and rising case volumes)—this study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of robotic adrenalectomy.
SN  - 0021-1265
SN  - 1863-4362
ER  -