Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of clinical medicine

Comorbidity Burden in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Lichen Planopilaris: A Systematic Review and Prevalence Meta-Analysis

4 affiliations
  1. 1Inflammatory Immune-Mediated Skin Diseases Laboratory (GC29), Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
  2. 2Department of Dermatology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
  3. 3Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
  4. 4Department of Pharmacy, Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) and lichen planopilaris (LPP) are primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias with frequently reported systemic and dermatological comorbidities, although their prevalence and consistency across studies remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random-effects prevalence meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250656067). MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, preprint sources, and reference lists were searched from inception to 18 June 2025 for observational studies reporting comorbidity prevalence in FFA and/or LPP. Results: Sixty studies comprising 4499 patients with FFA and 1370 with LPP were included. In FFA, the highest pooled prevalences among commonly reported conditions included androgenetic alopecia (31.9%), hypertension (23.6%), thyroid disorders (22.2%), hypothyroidism (20.6%), lichen planus pigmentosus (19.6%), and dyslipidemia (17.9%). In LPP, androgenetic alopecia (27.2%), hypertension (21.2%), hypothyroidism (18.7%), vitamin D deficiency (18.3%), dyslipidemia (16.0%), and thyroid disorders (14.5%) were prominent. Several estimates showed substantial between-study heterogeneity. Exploratory subgroup analyses identified study-level sources of heterogeneity for selected outcomes, whereas no meta-regression association remained significant after false-discovery-rate correction. Conclusions: These findings provide a quantitative map of comorbidity burden in FFA and LPP and support targeted, individualized clinical assessment. Because this analysis estimates prevalence within affected populations rather than comparative risk against controls, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of excess risk or causal relationships.

Related

  1. Comorbidities in frontal fibrosing alopecia and lichen planopilaris: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas, Francisco José Gómez-García, Elena Beatriz Sanz-Cabanillas +4
    JAAD internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Systematic review of efficacy of hair transplantation in patients with classic lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: revisiting the current evidence
    Rodolfo David Palacios-Diaz, Miguel Antonio Lasheras-Pérez
    Anais Brasileiros de DermatologiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Occipital hairline changes in women with frontal fibrosing alopecia receiving low-dose oral minoxidil.
    Gabrielle Baker, Megan Thuy Han Nguyen, Rachel K Greene +3
    JAAD internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Age-Standardized Comorbidity Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Conditions and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Hong Kong: A District Comparison
    J. Zhou, Z. Liu, Y. Cai +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Diagnostic Challenge in Cytology: Fibrosing Thyroiditis Mimicking Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
    G Anju, Meenakshi Rao, Nivedita Sharma
    Journal of cytologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sanzcabanillas2026comorbidity,
  title = {{Comorbidity Burden in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Lichen Planopilaris: A Systematic Review and Prevalence Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas and Francisco José Gómez-García and Elena Beatriz Sanz-Cabanillas and Jesús Gay-Mimbrera and Antonio José Vélez García-Nieto and Beatriz Isla-Tejera and Juan Ruano},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197728},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666100},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comorbidity Burden in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Lichen Planopilaris: A Systematic Review and Prevalence Meta-Analysis
AU  - Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas
AU  - Francisco José Gómez-García
AU  - Elena Beatriz Sanz-Cabanillas
AU  - Jesús Gay-Mimbrera
AU  - Antonio José Vélez García-Nieto
AU  - Beatriz Isla-Tejera
AU  - Juan Ruano
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197728
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666100
AB  - Background/Objectives: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) and lichen planopilaris (LPP) are primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias with frequently reported systemic and dermatological comorbidities, although their prevalence and consistency across studies remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random-effects prevalence meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250656067). MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, preprint sources, and reference lists were searched from inception to 18 June 2025 for observational studies reporting comorbidity prevalence in FFA and/or LPP. Results: Sixty studies comprising 4499 patients with FFA and 1370 with LPP were included. In FFA, the highest pooled prevalences among commonly reported conditions included androgenetic alopecia (31.9%), hypertension (23.6%), thyroid disorders (22.2%), hypothyroidism (20.6%), lichen planus pigmentosus (19.6%), and dyslipidemia (17.9%). In LPP, androgenetic alopecia (27.2%), hypertension (21.2%), hypothyroidism (18.7%), vitamin D deficiency (18.3%), dyslipidemia (16.0%), and thyroid disorders (14.5%) were prominent. Several estimates showed substantial between-study heterogeneity. Exploratory subgroup analyses identified study-level sources of heterogeneity for selected outcomes, whereas no meta-regression association remained significant after false-discovery-rate correction. Conclusions: These findings provide a quantitative map of comorbidity burden in FFA and LPP and support targeted, individualized clinical assessment. Because this analysis estimates prevalence within affected populations rather than comparative risk against controls, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of excess risk or causal relationships.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -