Efficacy of amitraz acaricide footbaths against cattle and goat tick infestations on sites in Highveld and Lowveld regions of Zimbabwe
Abstract
Ticks cause significant economic losses in the Zimbabwean livestock sector. Conventional control methods such as plunge dipping or hand spraying are costly, water-intensive, and often impractical, particularly during dry seasons. This study evaluated the efficacy of amitraz acaricide footbaths in reducing tick infestations on cattle and goat across three sites in the Highveld and Lowveld regions of Zimbabwe between February and October 2023. Tick infestation levels were compared between livestock managed using conventional tick control methods (plunge dipping complemented by tick grease application in Lowveld, or complete body hand spraying in the highveld) and livestock managed using footbathing complemented by tick grease application. A total of 21,500 ticks representing eight species were collected on 48 cattle and 48 goats. The effects of treatment and season on tick infestation were tested using zero-inflated negative binomial regression models, which accounted for excess zeros and overdispersion in tick count data. In the Lowveld, footbaths significantly reduced cattle tick infestation by the 3 most abundant tick species: Ripicephalus microplus (40% reduction), Amblyoma. hebraeum (51%) and R. decoloratus (43%). Significant reductions in infestation rate by A. hebraeum (70%) and R. decoloratus (68%) was also observed on goats from the same Lowveld site. In the Highveld goat site, footbath significantly reduced infestation by A. hebraeum (91%), R. appendiculatus (46%), R. decoloratus (49%) and R. evertsi evertsi (82%) on goats. In the Highveld cattle site where the conventional method to control ticks was complete body hand spraying, footbathing was not more effective than the conventional method for controlling R. decoloratus, the dominant tick species. Tick counts varied seasonally, with Rhipicephalus subgenus Boophilus ticks most abundant on cattle, during the dry season in Lowveld and during the rainy season in Highveld). Similarly, footbath did not perform better than conventional methods to control Hyalomma tick species (i.e. H. truncatum and H. rufides) found in goats and cattle in the Highveld and Lowveld sites. The study also shows patterns of seasonal variation (i.e. difference between the rainy season and the dry season) in ticks infestation rates that differ depending on site, host species and tick species. These findings suggest that acaricide footbaths provide a practical, low-cost alternative for tick control in both cattle and goats, especially in areas with limited water resources.
Related
- Fluffy nests and bloody parasites: feather lining does not mitigate bird blow flies infestations
- Practices and Challenges Associated With Vulpia myuros Infestations in Western European Arable Systems
- Protecting mothers and their infants through screening and comprehensive management of sexually transmitted infections in antenatal care in Zimbabwe (PROMISE): study protocol for an open label individually randomised controlled trial.
- Invasive alien plants of horticultural origin growing in Zimbabwe: Analysis of control mechanisms and management.
- Seasonal rainfall impacts the relative performance of maize-legume intercropping systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe
BibTeX
@article{daga2026efficacy,
title = {{Efficacy of amitraz acaricide footbaths against cattle and goat tick infestations on sites in Highveld and Lowveld regions of Zimbabwe}},
author = {Obey Daga and Thokozani Hove and Silvester Chikerema and Vladimir Grosbois and Christopher Gadzirai and Frédéric Stachurski and Mathieu Bourgarel and Laure Guerrini},
journal = {Parasite Epidemiology and Control},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.parepi.2026.e00479},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05774784v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Efficacy of amitraz acaricide footbaths against cattle and goat tick infestations on sites in Highveld and Lowveld regions of Zimbabwe
AU - Obey Daga
AU - Thokozani Hove
AU - Silvester Chikerema
AU - Vladimir Grosbois
AU - Christopher Gadzirai
AU - Frédéric Stachurski
AU - Mathieu Bourgarel
AU - Laure Guerrini
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Parasite Epidemiology and Control
DO - 10.1016/j.parepi.2026.e00479
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05774784v1
AB - Ticks cause significant economic losses in the Zimbabwean livestock sector. Conventional control methods such as plunge dipping or hand spraying are costly, water-intensive, and often impractical, particularly during dry seasons. This study evaluated the efficacy of amitraz acaricide footbaths in reducing tick infestations on cattle and goat across three sites in the Highveld and Lowveld regions of Zimbabwe between February and October 2023. Tick infestation levels were compared between livestock managed using conventional tick control methods (plunge dipping complemented by tick grease application in Lowveld, or complete body hand spraying in the highveld) and livestock managed using footbathing complemented by tick grease application. A total of 21,500 ticks representing eight species were collected on 48 cattle and 48 goats. The effects of treatment and season on tick infestation were tested using zero-inflated negative binomial regression models, which accounted for excess zeros and overdispersion in tick count data. In the Lowveld, footbaths significantly reduced cattle tick infestation by the 3 most abundant tick species: Ripicephalus microplus (40% reduction), Amblyoma. hebraeum (51%) and R. decoloratus (43%). Significant reductions in infestation rate by A. hebraeum (70%) and R. decoloratus (68%) was also observed on goats from the same Lowveld site. In the Highveld goat site, footbath significantly reduced infestation by A. hebraeum (91%), R. appendiculatus (46%), R. decoloratus (49%) and R. evertsi evertsi (82%) on goats. In the Highveld cattle site where the conventional method to control ticks was complete body hand spraying, footbathing was not more effective than the conventional method for controlling R. decoloratus, the dominant tick species. Tick counts varied seasonally, with Rhipicephalus subgenus Boophilus ticks most abundant on cattle, during the dry season in Lowveld and during the rainy season in Highveld). Similarly, footbath did not perform better than conventional methods to control Hyalomma tick species (i.e. H. truncatum and H. rufides) found in goats and cattle in the Highveld and Lowveld sites. The study also shows patterns of seasonal variation (i.e. difference between the rainy season and the dry season) in ticks infestation rates that differ depending on site, host species and tick species. These findings suggest that acaricide footbaths provide a practical, low-cost alternative for tick control in both cattle and goats, especially in areas with limited water resources.
SN - 2405-6731
ER -