Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in medicine

Multistage CBAM-enhanced deep learning for three-class classification of radiographically derived bone mass status labels on knee radiographs

  1. 1School of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine , , ,
  2. 2Orthopedics and Traumatology, Xianning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine , , ,

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate a deep learning model incorporating multistage convolutional block attention modules (CBAMs) for classifying the radiographically derived bone-mass labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) of a public knee radiograph dataset, and to investigate the potential of knee radiography for opportunistic screening of abnormal bone mass.Methods

This study used the publicly available Multi-Class Knee Osteoporosis x-Ray Dataset, which was released on Kaggle and compiled from multiple publicly accessible knee radiograph sources. The class labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) were assigned by the dataset provider on the basis of radiographic features and were not verified against dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores; the model therefore classifies the dataset's radiographic labels rather than DXA-defined bone mass status. After assessing image integrity, label consistency, and data usability, a total of 1,947 knee radiographs were included, comprising 780 images labeled as normal bone mass, 374 as osteopenia, and 793 as osteoporosis. The dataset was stratified into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 70:20:10. All images were resized to 224 × 224 pixels and normalized using the ImageNet mean and standard deviation. A multi-stage convolutional block attention module (CBAM)-enhanced classification model was developed based on a VGG19-style convolutional neural network and compared with the ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet121, and VGG19 baseline models, as well as several attention-based ablation models. Model performance was evaluated using overall accuracy, class-wise precision, recall, and F1-score, together with confusion matrices and one-vs.-rest receiver operating characteristic curves. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was further used to visualize and assess the image regions contributing to model predictions.Results

On the independent test set, the multistage CBAM model achieved the highest overall accuracy of 90.77% (177/195), outperforming VGG19, ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet121, and a reproduced model from the literature. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.982 for normal bone mass, 0.991 for osteopenia, and 0.981 for osteoporosis. The confusion matrix showed 68/78, 34/38, and 75/79 correctly classified images in the three categories, respectively, with most errors occurring between adjacent bone-mass states. Ablation experiments showed that multistage CBAM outperformed attention-free VGG19, SE-VGG19, ECA-VGG19, and stacked CBAM. Grad-CAM highlighted primarily the distal femur, proximal tibia, and periarticular osseous structures. All results were obtained from a single stratified split and a single random seed (42); because of limited computational resources, repeated runs over multiple seeds and k-fold cross-validation could not be performed.Conclusion

The multistage CBAM-enhanced model effectively distinguished the radiographically derived bone-mass labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) of this public knee radiograph dataset. Because the labels were not verified against DXA, the model should be regarded as a classifier of the dataset's radiographic labels rather than of DXA-defined bone mass status. It may serve as an adjunctive tool for opportunistic screening of abnormal bone mass and provide imaging-based prompts for subsequent DXA assessment and fracture-risk evaluation, subject to further validation against DXA-derived ground truth, de-duplication and patient-level partitioning, and external data.

Related

  1. Dental arch classification using deep learning and federated learning on DenPAR radiographs
    Abdullah Qureshi, Qurat Ul Ain Aini, Evgeny Solomin +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Quantum-enhanced deep learning for Parkinson’s disease classification
    Kagitha Samitha, Venkata Ratna Prabha K, G. Pradeep Reddy +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyDOAJ
  3. Optimization-enhanced machine failure classification using critical sensor features and hybrid learning models with advanced optimization techniques
    Jinqin Tang, Junling Chai, Jinkun Dai +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Reverse Dorr Classification of Lateral Knee Radiographs: A Qualitative Assessment of Bone Quality in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Matthew A Beilfuss, Micah MacAskill, Kyle R Wagner +3
    Arthroplasty todayPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Deep Learning-based Classification of Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using Left Ventricular Opacification and Enhanced LV Apex Imaging
    P. Venkatesan, A. Rajeswari, N.R. Shanker
    Current Medical ImagingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026multistage,
  title = {{Multistage CBAM-enhanced deep learning for three-class classification of radiographically derived bone mass status labels on knee radiographs}},
  author = {Songjia Li and Jing Lv and Tao Fang},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1960438},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716733},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multistage CBAM-enhanced deep learning for three-class classification of radiographically derived bone mass status labels on knee radiographs
AU  - Songjia Li
AU  - Jing Lv
AU  - Tao Fang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1960438
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716733
AB  - Objective  To develop and validate a deep learning model incorporating multistage convolutional block attention modules (CBAMs) for classifying the radiographically derived bone-mass labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) of a public knee radiograph dataset, and to investigate the potential of knee radiography for opportunistic screening of abnormal bone mass.Methods  This study used the publicly available Multi-Class Knee Osteoporosis x-Ray Dataset, which was released on Kaggle and compiled from multiple publicly accessible knee radiograph sources. The class labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) were assigned by the dataset provider on the basis of radiographic features and were not verified against dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores; the model therefore classifies the dataset's radiographic labels rather than DXA-defined bone mass status. After assessing image integrity, label consistency, and data usability, a total of 1,947 knee radiographs were included, comprising 780 images labeled as normal bone mass, 374 as osteopenia, and 793 as osteoporosis. The dataset was stratified into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 70:20:10. All images were resized to 224 × 224 pixels and normalized using the ImageNet mean and standard deviation. A multi-stage convolutional block attention module (CBAM)-enhanced classification model was developed based on a VGG19-style convolutional neural network and compared with the ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet121, and VGG19 baseline models, as well as several attention-based ablation models. Model performance was evaluated using overall accuracy, class-wise precision, recall, and F1-score, together with confusion matrices and one-vs.-rest receiver operating characteristic curves. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was further used to visualize and assess the image regions contributing to model predictions.Results  On the independent test set, the multistage CBAM model achieved the highest overall accuracy of 90.77% (177/195), outperforming VGG19, ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet121, and a reproduced model from the literature. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.982 for normal bone mass, 0.991 for osteopenia, and 0.981 for osteoporosis. The confusion matrix showed 68/78, 34/38, and 75/79 correctly classified images in the three categories, respectively, with most errors occurring between adjacent bone-mass states. Ablation experiments showed that multistage CBAM outperformed attention-free VGG19, SE-VGG19, ECA-VGG19, and stacked CBAM. Grad-CAM highlighted primarily the distal femur, proximal tibia, and periarticular osseous structures. All results were obtained from a single stratified split and a single random seed (42); because of limited computational resources, repeated runs over multiple seeds and k-fold cross-validation could not be performed.Conclusion  The multistage CBAM-enhanced model effectively distinguished the radiographically derived bone-mass labels (normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) of this public knee radiograph dataset. Because the labels were not verified against DXA, the model should be regarded as a classifier of the dataset's radiographic labels rather than of DXA-defined bone mass status. It may serve as an adjunctive tool for opportunistic screening of abnormal bone mass and provide imaging-based prompts for subsequent DXA assessment and fracture-risk evaluation, subject to further validation against DXA-derived ground truth, de-duplication and patient-level partitioning, and external data.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -