Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Ternary polynomial relations and periods of cusp forms

Abstract

Bachmann and van Ittersum conjectured that every polynomial f∈ℚ[x,y,z] satisfying f(x,y,z)=f(y,z,x), f(x,y,z)+f(−y,x−y,z)+f(y−x,−x,z)=0 is a sum of polynomials in two variables. We prove this conjecture over every field of characteristic zero and determine all homogeneous solutions. Moreover, restriction to z=0 identifies the degree n solution space with the space of binary period polynomials of degree n normalized to vanish on both coordinate axes. The solution corresponding to such a polynomial q is f(x,y,z)=q(x,y)+q(y,z)+q(z,x). There are no nonzero homogeneous solutions of odd degree. For even degrees n, the symmetric and alternating solution spaces are each isomorphic over ℂ to the space of weight n+2 cusp forms on SL2(ℤ). The proof connects the polynomial relations with the cohomology of arithmetic groups through the rational Tits building for GL3. Cusp forms enter both the description of the solutions and the proof that there are no others. The main theorems and the essential argument are formalized unconditionally in Lean~4 by AxiomProver.

Related

  1. An explicit refined Gan--Gross--Prasad identity for Fourier--Jacobi periods of degree 2 Siegel cusp forms
    Biplab Paul, Ameya Pitale, Abhishek Saha +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Spectral fourth moments of Hecke--Maaß cusp forms
    Edgar Assing, Peter Humphries
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Noncongruence cusp forms, Veech groups and enumeration
    John Rached
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. When GL(2) cusp forms meet CM points in GSp(4)
    Shenghao Hua, Shaoyun Yi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. On Decomposition of Drinfeld cusp forms of level t
    Tarun Dalal
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ilin2026ternary,
  title = {{Ternary polynomial relations and periods of cusp forms}},
  author = {Vasily Ilin and Ken Ono},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.19309},
  eprint = {2610.19309},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19309},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ternary polynomial relations and periods of cusp forms
AU  - Vasily Ilin
AU  - Ken Ono
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19309
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19309
AB  - Bachmann and van Ittersum conjectured that every polynomial f∈ℚ[x,y,z] satisfying f(x,y,z)=f(y,z,x), f(x,y,z)+f(−y,x−y,z)+f(y−x,−x,z)=0 is a sum of polynomials in two variables. We prove this conjecture over every field of characteristic zero and determine all homogeneous solutions. Moreover, restriction to z=0 identifies the degree n solution space with the space of binary period polynomials of degree n normalized to vanish on both coordinate axes. The solution corresponding to such a polynomial q is f(x,y,z)=q(x,y)+q(y,z)+q(z,x). There are no nonzero homogeneous solutions of odd degree. For even degrees n, the symmetric and alternating solution spaces are each isomorphic over ℂ to the space of weight n+2 cusp forms on SL_2(ℤ). The proof connects the polynomial relations with the cohomology of arithmetic groups through the rational Tits building for GL_3. Cusp forms enter both the description of the solutions and the proof that there are no others. The main theorems and the essential argument are formalized unconditionally in Lean~4 by AxiomProver.
ER  -