Profiles in aesthetic engagement: A new survey and a snapshot of behavior in the United States
Abstract
The measurement of art engagement, typically relies on narrow views of engagement, emphasizing attendance at fine arts institutions. Such approaches underestimate the variety of aesthetic participation and likely underrepresent groups who experience barriers to access or engage with aesthetics outside traditional art venues. The rise of digital modes of participation further challenges the adequacy of conventional assessments. To address these gaps, we developed the Assessment of Aesthetic Participation, a new survey that builds on the strengths of nationally administered National Endowment of the Arts surveys, and captures a broader spectrum of aesthetic behaviors, including everyday aesthetic activities, religious and heritage embedded practices, and digitally mediated engagement. To establish its utility for experimental research, we validated the Assessment of Aesthetic Participation against commonly used measures in empirical aesthetics—the Revised Aesthetic Fluency Scale and the Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment. Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample (N=1501) replicate previously observed demographic trends related to age and education, while suggesting a more complex pattern for race and gender. An exploratory latent profile analysis suggested five distinct styles of engagement, differentiated by frequency and preferred activities: low participation by the Disengaged, intermediate but distinguishable patterns of the Spectator, the Fan, and the Enthusiast, and the highly engaged Aesthete. The Assessment of Aesthetic Participation offers a flexible, inclusive tool that addresses limits in existing measures of arts engagement, bridges the measurement needs of population-level and experimental researchers, and can advance future research on the benefits of aesthetic experiences.
Related
- Linking continuous behavior to aesthetic enjoyment in a walkable virtual-reality museum tour: effects of agency and a painting-level analysis framework
- A metagenomic snapshot of metabolic potentials in wintertime eutrophic sediments of Lake Taihu inferred from metagenome-assembled genomes
- Anatomically Guided Deep Learning Reconstruction of Accelerated Snapshot CEST MRI
- Identifiability of a linear dynamical reaction-diffusion system with directed interactions from the second-order statistics of a single snapshot
- Ornamental motifs and visual concerns: Exploring aesthetic pleasure and conservation intention in architectural heritage renovation
BibTeX
@misc{cardillo2026profiles,
title = {{Profiles in aesthetic engagement: A new survey and a snapshot of behavior in the United States}},
author = {Eileen R. Cardillo and Hannah Merseal and Raphael Englander and Anjan Chatterjee},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/6uxje_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6uxje_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Profiles in aesthetic engagement: A new survey and a snapshot of behavior in the United States
AU - Eileen R. Cardillo
AU - Hannah Merseal
AU - Raphael Englander
AU - Anjan Chatterjee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/6uxje_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6uxje_v1/
AB - The measurement of art engagement, typically relies on narrow views of engagement, emphasizing attendance at fine arts institutions. Such approaches underestimate the variety of aesthetic participation and likely underrepresent groups who experience barriers to access or engage with aesthetics outside traditional art venues. The rise of digital modes of participation further challenges the adequacy of conventional assessments. To address these gaps, we developed the Assessment of Aesthetic Participation, a new survey that builds on the strengths of nationally administered National Endowment of the Arts surveys, and captures a broader spectrum of aesthetic behaviors, including everyday aesthetic activities, religious and heritage embedded practices, and digitally mediated engagement. To establish its utility for experimental research, we validated the Assessment of Aesthetic Participation against commonly used measures in empirical aesthetics—the Revised Aesthetic Fluency Scale and the Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment. Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample (N=1501) replicate previously observed demographic trends related to age and education, while suggesting a more complex pattern for race and gender. An exploratory latent profile analysis suggested five distinct styles of engagement, differentiated by frequency and preferred activities: low participation by the Disengaged, intermediate but distinguishable patterns of the Spectator, the Fan, and the Enthusiast, and the highly engaged Aesthete. The Assessment of Aesthetic Participation offers a flexible, inclusive tool that addresses limits in existing measures of arts engagement, bridges the measurement needs of population-level and experimental researchers, and can advance future research on the benefits of aesthetic experiences.
ER -