Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Geriatric and Primary Care Clinics and Driving Assessment Outcomes.
- 1Geriatrics, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, USA.
- 2Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, USA.
Abstract
Background
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can affect complex daily activities, including driving. This quality-improvement project compared documented MCI case counts in an outpatient geriatric clinic and a traditional primary care clinic and described Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) referral documentation and driving assessment outcomes.Materials and methods
A retrospective Epic electronic health record (EHR) review (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, WI, USA) covered 2021-2023 and adults aged 65 years and older. Electronic G31.84 queries identified candidates; preserved basic and instrumental daily function and verified Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 19-25 were required for inclusion. Scanned MoCA tests and both DMV forms were located by manual chart review. Completed written and behind-the-wheel testing and overall pass/fail outcomes were distinguished. Counts and proportions were summarized descriptively, with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for assessment outcomes.Results
Clinic totals were 3,233 geriatric and 3,943 primary care visits. The geriatric query identified 60 candidates. Scanned MoCA tests were located in 36; 24 without located tests were excluded. Two scores were 11, leaving 34 eligible patients. The primary care code query returned zero patients. All 34 were offered DMV assessment through shared decision making; 17 (50.0%) had documented referrals with DMV notification and initial reporting forms in their charts. The later provider form was documented for 10 of the 17. Eight completed testing (47.1% of referred patients; 80.0% of those with the later form documented). Two passed (25.0%; 95% CI, 3.2%-65.1%) and six failed (75.0%; 95% CI, 34.9%-96.8%). Eight patients continued driving without a documented referral; the reasons were undocumented.Conclusions
Documented MCI case capture differed between clinics. Findings among assessment completers support routine clinical review of driving safety, individualized referral for formal evaluation, and coordinated follow-up. The failure proportion from this small, selected subgroup cannot be generalized to the wider MCI population. Prospective evaluation should examine patient safety, experience, and continued mobility.
Related
- AI and speech-based identification of cognitive impairment in maintenance haemodialysis—the ASPIRE study
- Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis With Hemodynamic Impairment and Cognitive Outcomes
- Impact of a mobile geriatric team assessment on decision-making and outcomes in older patients evaluated for TAVI
- Mechanisms of Benefit in Geriatric Assessment (GA): Approach‐Oriented Coping Mediates Outcomes of a GA‐Guided Supportive Care Intervention (GAIN‐S)
- Content Validity and Psychometric Properties Assessment of the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool and Application in Multiregional Clinical Trials of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia.
BibTeX
@article{moshiri2026mild,
title = {{Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Geriatric and Primary Care Clinics and Driving Assessment Outcomes.}},
author = {Kourosh A Moshiri and Mahon Mahmodian},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.118578},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928925},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Geriatric and Primary Care Clinics and Driving Assessment Outcomes.
AU - Kourosh A Moshiri
AU - Mahon Mahmodian
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.118578
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928925
AB - Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can affect complex daily activities, including driving. This quality-improvement project compared documented MCI case counts in an outpatient geriatric clinic and a traditional primary care clinic and described Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) referral documentation and driving assessment outcomes.Materials and methods A retrospective Epic electronic health record (EHR) review (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, WI, USA) covered 2021-2023 and adults aged 65 years and older. Electronic G31.84 queries identified candidates; preserved basic and instrumental daily function and verified Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 19-25 were required for inclusion. Scanned MoCA tests and both DMV forms were located by manual chart review. Completed written and behind-the-wheel testing and overall pass/fail outcomes were distinguished. Counts and proportions were summarized descriptively, with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for assessment outcomes.Results Clinic totals were 3,233 geriatric and 3,943 primary care visits. The geriatric query identified 60 candidates. Scanned MoCA tests were located in 36; 24 without located tests were excluded. Two scores were 11, leaving 34 eligible patients. The primary care code query returned zero patients. All 34 were offered DMV assessment through shared decision making; 17 (50.0%) had documented referrals with DMV notification and initial reporting forms in their charts. The later provider form was documented for 10 of the 17. Eight completed testing (47.1% of referred patients; 80.0% of those with the later form documented). Two passed (25.0%; 95% CI, 3.2%-65.1%) and six failed (75.0%; 95% CI, 34.9%-96.8%). Eight patients continued driving without a documented referral; the reasons were undocumented.Conclusions Documented MCI case capture differed between clinics. Findings among assessment completers support routine clinical review of driving safety, individualized referral for formal evaluation, and coordinated follow-up. The failure proportion from this small, selected subgroup cannot be generalized to the wider MCI population. Prospective evaluation should examine patient safety, experience, and continued mobility.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -