Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Sensing the heart, seeing the world: Neural mechanisms of attentional allocation between interoception and exteroception

  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Abstract

Adaptive behaviour requires the flexible allocation of attention between sensory information arising from the external environment (exteroception) and signals originating within the body (interoception). While the neural mechanisms supporting exteroceptive attention have been extensively characterised, considerably less is known about how attention is allocated between competing interoceptive and exteroceptive sources of information. To address this question, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare cardiac interoceptive attention during heartbeat counting with a carefully matched visual target counting task. Importantly, external visual input was held constant during both tasks, and behavioural accuracy and subjective confidence ratings for task difficulty did not differ significantly between conditions. This provided a controlled comparison in which attention was selectively allocated between internal bodily signals and external sensory information. Cardiac interoceptive and visual exteroceptive attention engaged largely distinct cortical networks. Cardiac interoceptive attention recruited a distributed insula-centred network supporting interoceptive processing and cognitive control. In contrast, visual target counting engaged a dorsal frontoparietal attention network and selectively shaped activity within visual cortex, enhancing regions representing task-relevant central visual information while suppressing regions representing task-irrelevant peripheral visual information. Despite this functional segregation, activity within these systems was not independent of where attention was directed. Exteroceptive attention suppressed activity within the posterior insula, suggesting down-regulation of interoceptive processing. Conversely, peripheral visual regions remained suppressed during interoceptive attention, suggesting that externally directed sensory processing is also down-regulated when attention is directed towards the body. More accurate heartbeat counting was additionally associated with less engagement of the right inferior parietal lobule, consistent with reduced bottom-up attentional capture by external sensory information. Together, these findings are consistent with competitive allocation of attentional resources between neural systems supporting internal bodily signals and external sensory information. More broadly, they provide a system-level account of how the human brain flexibly balances internal and external information during goal-directed behaviour.

Related

  1. Context-specific allocation of attentional control in anxiety and uncontrollability
    Marcin Bukowski, Joaquín M. M. Vaquero, Alberto Acosta +1
    Cognitive ProcessingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  2. Identifying attentional control mechanisms related to the performance of high- and low-skilled First-Person Shooter game players: With exploratory data on expert older-adult esports players
    Inhyeok Jeong, Akinori Takeda, Daisuke Shimane +1
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. A Relevance Rate Model of the affective mechanisms linking social media use to later attentional disruption
    Hippolyte Fournier, eva pool, David Sander +1
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  4. Common attentional mechanisms, but distinct computational dynamics, across Statistical and Reward Learning
    C. Dolci, T. Verguts, W. J. Louter +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Transcriptional control of higher alcohol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a systems framework linking nutrient sensing, precursor allocation, Ehrlich output, and stress adaptation
    Lu Chen, Yuyang Song, Yanlin Liu +1
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0MicrobiologyFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{kumar2026sensing,
  title = {{Sensing the heart, seeing the world: Neural mechanisms of attentional allocation between interoception and exteroception}},
  author = {S. Kumar and J. S. Winston and H. D. Critchley and T. D. Griffiths},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.22.751480},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.751480v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sensing the heart, seeing the world: Neural mechanisms of attentional allocation between interoception and exteroception
AU  - S. Kumar
AU  - J. S. Winston
AU  - H. D. Critchley
AU  - T. D. Griffiths
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.22.751480
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.751480v1
AB  - Adaptive behaviour requires the flexible allocation of attention between sensory information arising from the external environment (exteroception) and signals originating within the body (interoception). While the neural mechanisms supporting exteroceptive attention have been extensively characterised, considerably less is known about how attention is allocated between competing interoceptive and exteroceptive sources of information. To address this question, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare cardiac interoceptive attention during heartbeat counting with a carefully matched visual target counting task. Importantly, external visual input was held constant during both tasks, and behavioural accuracy and subjective confidence ratings for task difficulty did not differ significantly between conditions. This provided a controlled comparison in which attention was selectively allocated between internal bodily signals and external sensory information. Cardiac interoceptive and visual exteroceptive attention engaged largely distinct cortical networks. Cardiac interoceptive attention recruited a distributed insula-centred network supporting interoceptive processing and cognitive control. In contrast, visual target counting engaged a dorsal frontoparietal attention network and selectively shaped activity within visual cortex, enhancing regions representing task-relevant central visual information while suppressing regions representing task-irrelevant peripheral visual information. Despite this functional segregation, activity within these systems was not independent of where attention was directed. Exteroceptive attention suppressed activity within the posterior insula, suggesting down-regulation of interoceptive processing. Conversely, peripheral visual regions remained suppressed during interoceptive attention, suggesting that externally directed sensory processing is also down-regulated when attention is directed towards the body. More accurate heartbeat counting was additionally associated with less engagement of the right inferior parietal lobule, consistent with reduced bottom-up attentional capture by external sensory information. Together, these findings are consistent with competitive allocation of attentional resources between neural systems supporting internal bodily signals and external sensory information. More broadly, they provide a system-level account of how the human brain flexibly balances internal and external information during goal-directed behaviour.
ER  -