Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Radiologist-guided multimodal fusion network for differentiating parotid tumors on 3D non-contrast CT

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Precision Radiation in Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  3. 3Department of Oncology, Meizhou People’s Hospital
  4. 4Department of Oncology, Bazhong City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of benign versus malignant parotid tumors using non-contrast CT. We propose a clinician-in-the-loop hybrid framework that mitigates low soft-tissue contrast by fusing semi-automated 3D visual features with expert semantic descriptors.

Methods: This multi-center retrospective study analyzed non-contrast CTs from 367 patients. We developed AttenNet, a semi-automated model. First, an nnU-Net module automates 3D tumor segmentation, eliminating manual bounding boxes. A 3D-ResNet backbone then extracts volumetric features, which are dynamically fused with radiologist-provided semantic labels via a Multi-Head Cross-Attention Fusion (MHAF) mechanism. This allows the network to query visual morphology based on expert priors. Diagnostic performance and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) interpretability were evaluated.

Results: The segmentation achieved a median Dice of 0.827. AttenNet (3D-ResNet) yielded an AUC of 0.908, significantly outperforming the image-only 3D-ResNet (AUC: 0.741) and expert-feature models (AUC: 0.821). External validation ( n = 20) reached an AUC of 0.560–0.910.However, given the extremely small sample size, these results must be interpreted strictly as an exploratory proof-of-concept rather than definitive confirmation of generalizability. Grad-CAM confirmed that AttenNet highlights clinically essential geometric indicators-specifically tumor margins and internal heterogeneity-for differentiating malignancy, whereas single-modality baselines focused on background artifacts.

Conclusion: This clinician-in-the-loop paradigm successfully integrates spatial imaging with expert reasoning. While multimodal fusion drove the primary performance gains, the MHAF mechanism provided enhanced spatial interpretability.

Related

  1. The radiologist’s dilemma: Differentiating non-ischemic pneumatosis intestinalis from ischemic bowel necrosis
    Radiology case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion in Multiparametric Prostate MRI: An Exploratory Intra-Patient Study Differentiating Malignant Lesions from Normal Tissue
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Differentiating pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma from solid pseudopapillary neoplasm using contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Jie Yu, Yingying Cao, Anna Jie +3
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. Qualitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Time–Intensity Curve Analysis for Differentiating Non-Progressive Treatment-Related Changes from Tumor Progression After Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases
    Andrea Romano, Giulia Moltoni, Anna Maria Ascolese +8
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Visualising uterine microcirculation using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating between healthy controls and participants with adenomyosis: rationale and design of the UteroVue Adenomyosis study.
    Eva J E de Bock, Nicole B Burger, Naem Donner +6
    European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: XPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yang2026radiologistguided,
  title = {{Radiologist-guided multimodal fusion network for differentiating parotid tumors on 3D non-contrast CT}},
  author = {Qin Yang and Wenjun Liao and Jianda Sun and Dacheng Mu and Minyang Yang and Qiaohua Li and Yue Zhao and Shichuan Zhang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1926379},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1926379/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Radiologist-guided multimodal fusion network for differentiating parotid tumors on 3D non-contrast CT
AU  - Qin Yang
AU  - Wenjun Liao
AU  - Jianda Sun
AU  - Dacheng Mu
AU  - Minyang Yang
AU  - Qiaohua Li
AU  - Yue Zhao
AU  - Shichuan Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1926379
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1926379/full
AB  - Objectives: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of benign versus malignant parotid tumors using non-contrast CT. We propose a clinician-in-the-loop hybrid framework that mitigates low soft-tissue contrast by fusing semi-automated 3D visual features with expert semantic descriptors.  Methods: This multi-center retrospective study analyzed non-contrast CTs from 367 patients. We developed AttenNet, a semi-automated model. First, an nnU-Net module automates 3D tumor segmentation, eliminating manual bounding boxes. A 3D-ResNet backbone then extracts volumetric features, which are dynamically fused with radiologist-provided semantic labels via a Multi-Head Cross-Attention Fusion (MHAF) mechanism. This allows the network to query visual morphology based on expert priors. Diagnostic performance and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) interpretability were evaluated.  Results: The segmentation achieved a median Dice of 0.827. AttenNet (3D-ResNet) yielded an AUC of 0.908, significantly outperforming the image-only 3D-ResNet (AUC: 0.741) and expert-feature models (AUC: 0.821). External validation ( n = 20) reached an AUC of 0.560–0.910.However, given the extremely small sample size, these results must be interpreted strictly as an exploratory proof-of-concept rather than definitive confirmation of generalizability. Grad-CAM confirmed that AttenNet highlights clinically essential geometric indicators-specifically tumor margins and internal heterogeneity-for differentiating malignancy, whereas single-modality baselines focused on background artifacts.  Conclusion: This clinician-in-the-loop paradigm successfully integrates spatial imaging with expert reasoning. While multimodal fusion drove the primary performance gains, the MHAF mechanism provided enhanced spatial interpretability.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -