Surveillance After Thoracic Aortic Surgery Yields to Low Number of Reinterventions: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Aim: Postoperative imaging surveillance after thoracic aortic surgery is widely recommended, but its clinical yield, efficiency, and optimal targeting remain poorly defined. We aimed to quantify imaging intensity, determine the procedural yield of surveillance imaging, and assess whether follow-up strategies could be better individualized.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery between 2010 and 2024. Postoperative imaging examinations were reviewed and linked with subsequent treatment decisions. Imaging findings, reinterventions, timing of events, detection context, and follow-up patterns were analysed.
Results: The cohort included 380 patients with 1757 postoperative imaging examinations, of which 1074 were classified as surveillance aortic imaging performed ≥30 days after surgery. Overall, 42 examinations led to reintervention in 29 patients (7.6%), including 13 examinations leading to aortic reoperation in 12 patients. Among surveillance aortic examinations, 41 (3.8%) led to reintervention and 16 (1.5%) met treatment thresholds without immediate intervention, yielding a combined directly or potentially actionable finding rate of 5.3%. This corresponded to 26.2 surveillance examinations per reintervention and 82.6 per aortic reoperation. Cumulative incidences of first reintervention were 2.8% at 1 year, 5.9% at 3 years, and 8.3% at 5 years. Most reinterventions were identified during elective surveillance imaging (71.4%). Despite more frequent imaging among emergency patients, reintervention risk and imaging yield were similar to those of non-emergency patients.
Conclusions: Postoperative imaging surveillance after thoracic aortic surgery was associated with substantial imaging burden but low immediate procedural yield, with clinically relevant findings concentrated in a minority of patients. These findings support the need to better define patient-specific risk and imaging efficiency but do not establish that less intensive surveillance would be safe without prospective validation.
Related
- Perioperative outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery in Johannesburg: a retrospective observational cohort study, 1995-2023.
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting intraoperative oxygenation impairment during one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study
- Postoperative pulmonary complications after high-altitude thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.
- Lean dual-portal versus conventional multi-portal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomical lung resection: a retrospective comparative cohort study of a sustainable approach harmonizing clinical efficiency, environmental protection, and next-generation education.
- Distal Anastomotic New Entries After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
BibTeX
@article{kurvinen2026surveillance,
title = {{Surveillance After Thoracic Aortic Surgery Yields to Low Number of Reinterventions: A Retrospective Cohort Study}},
author = {Henri-Jussi Kurvinen and Ari Mennander and Mikko Uimonen},
journal = {Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1093/icvts/ivag239},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag239},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Surveillance After Thoracic Aortic Surgery Yields to Low Number of Reinterventions: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU - Henri-Jussi Kurvinen
AU - Ari Mennander
AU - Mikko Uimonen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/26
JO - Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
DO - 10.1093/icvts/ivag239
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag239
AB - Aim: Postoperative imaging surveillance after thoracic aortic surgery is widely recommended, but its clinical yield, efficiency, and optimal targeting remain poorly defined. We aimed to quantify imaging intensity, determine the procedural yield of surveillance imaging, and assess whether follow-up strategies could be better individualized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery between 2010 and 2024. Postoperative imaging examinations were reviewed and linked with subsequent treatment decisions. Imaging findings, reinterventions, timing of events, detection context, and follow-up patterns were analysed. Results: The cohort included 380 patients with 1757 postoperative imaging examinations, of which 1074 were classified as surveillance aortic imaging performed ≥30 days after surgery. Overall, 42 examinations led to reintervention in 29 patients (7.6%), including 13 examinations leading to aortic reoperation in 12 patients. Among surveillance aortic examinations, 41 (3.8%) led to reintervention and 16 (1.5%) met treatment thresholds without immediate intervention, yielding a combined directly or potentially actionable finding rate of 5.3%. This corresponded to 26.2 surveillance examinations per reintervention and 82.6 per aortic reoperation. Cumulative incidences of first reintervention were 2.8% at 1 year, 5.9% at 3 years, and 8.3% at 5 years. Most reinterventions were identified during elective surveillance imaging (71.4%). Despite more frequent imaging among emergency patients, reintervention risk and imaging yield were similar to those of non-emergency patients. Conclusions: Postoperative imaging surveillance after thoracic aortic surgery was associated with substantial imaging burden but low immediate procedural yield, with clinically relevant findings concentrated in a minority of patients. These findings support the need to better define patient-specific risk and imaging efficiency but do not establish that less intensive surveillance would be safe without prospective validation.
SN - 2753-670X
ER -