Fixed-point spirometry biases the evaluation of posturo-respiratory coupling: A comparison with optoelectronic plethysmography
Abstract
Posturo-respiratory coupling (PRC) reflects the interaction between breathing and postural control, and its accurate assessment is essential for understanding breathing-related balance disorders. This study investigates whether the use of a fixed-point spirometer to assess breathing profile biases PRC evaluation compared to a contactless method-optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP). Thirty healthy participants underwent two conditions in a random order: natural breathing and breathing through a spirometer. Segmental oscillations and center of pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded using contactless motion capture and force platform. Respiratory emergence (REm) and Time Lock Averaging (TLA) were used to assess the effect of breathing on the multi-segmental balance. Breathing through a spirometer significantly reduced the amplitude and velocity of segmental oscillations and CoP displacement compared to natural breathing, while breathing frequency remained unchanged. The spirometer condition induced higher incidence of neck flexion during inspiration (TLA), and altered the REm, particularly by increasing REm at the shoulder level. These findings suggest that using a fixed-point, in-contact spirometer introduces a significant bias in PRC measurements. Two mechanisms of PRC alteration are suggested: (1) due to the physical constraints associated with subject's connection with the device; (2) of cortical origin in response to mouth breathing. In conclusion, although spirometry remains a gold standard for breathing assessment, it is unsuitable for PRC evaluation due to its disruptive influence on natural postural-respiratory dynamics. OEP, by preserving natural breathing and posture, offers a more reliable alternative for studying PRC, especially in ecological or clinical contexts such as respiratory rehabilitation or musical performance.
Related
- Relative phase noise suppression for two-color optical sources via optoelectronic feedback and feedforward
- A programmable optoelectronic Ising machine for direct third-order optimization
- Dosimetric Comparison of One-, Two-, Three-, and Four-Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans in Cervical Carcinoma: Evaluation of Plan Quality, Organ-at-Risk Sparing, and Treatment Efficiency.
- Integrated optoelectronic chip technologies for quantum information processing
- Computational investigation of a perovskite LaBiO3 for photovoltaic, thermoelectric, and optoelectronic applications
BibTeX
@article{valentin2026fixedpoint,
title = {{Fixed-point spirometry biases the evaluation of posturo-respiratory coupling: A comparison with optoelectronic plethysmography}},
author = {Rémi Valentin and Benoit Fabre and Delphine Chadefaux and Nathan Ouvrai and Thomas Similowski and Baptiste Sandoz and Valérie Attali},
journal = {Respiratory Physiology \& Neurobiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.resp.2025.104528},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05795776v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Fixed-point spirometry biases the evaluation of posturo-respiratory coupling: A comparison with optoelectronic plethysmography
AU - Rémi Valentin
AU - Benoit Fabre
AU - Delphine Chadefaux
AU - Nathan Ouvrai
AU - Thomas Similowski
AU - Baptiste Sandoz
AU - Valérie Attali
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
DO - 10.1016/j.resp.2025.104528
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05795776v1
AB - Posturo-respiratory coupling (PRC) reflects the interaction between breathing and postural control, and its accurate assessment is essential for understanding breathing-related balance disorders. This study investigates whether the use of a fixed-point spirometer to assess breathing profile biases PRC evaluation compared to a contactless method-optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP). Thirty healthy participants underwent two conditions in a random order: natural breathing and breathing through a spirometer. Segmental oscillations and center of pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded using contactless motion capture and force platform. Respiratory emergence (REm) and Time Lock Averaging (TLA) were used to assess the effect of breathing on the multi-segmental balance. Breathing through a spirometer significantly reduced the amplitude and velocity of segmental oscillations and CoP displacement compared to natural breathing, while breathing frequency remained unchanged. The spirometer condition induced higher incidence of neck flexion during inspiration (TLA), and altered the REm, particularly by increasing REm at the shoulder level. These findings suggest that using a fixed-point, in-contact spirometer introduces a significant bias in PRC measurements. Two mechanisms of PRC alteration are suggested: (1) due to the physical constraints associated with subject's connection with the device; (2) of cortical origin in response to mouth breathing. In conclusion, although spirometry remains a gold standard for breathing assessment, it is unsuitable for PRC evaluation due to its disruptive influence on natural postural-respiratory dynamics. OEP, by preserving natural breathing and posture, offers a more reliable alternative for studying PRC, especially in ecological or clinical contexts such as respiratory rehabilitation or musical performance.
SN - 1569-9048
SN - 1878-1519
ER -