Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Randomization Inference with Concentration Inequalities

Abstract

Randomization or design-based inference is becoming an increasingly popular tool for analysing data from randomized experiments: It does not require modelling assumptions on the distribution of outcomes or covariates, and hypothesis testing and estimation are respectively valid and unbiased in finite samples. Yet, confidence intervals for the sample average treatment effect (SATE) are still constructed via finite-population central limit theorems and their coverage is only asymptotic. In this work, we explore an alternative approach: We use concentration inequalities to construct confidence intervals for the SATE with non-asymptotic guarantees. We develop this approach for the most common experimental designs (Bernoulli trials and completely randomized experiments) and provide Hoeffding and Bernstein-type confidence intervals. Moreover, we extend these results to matched-pair, cluster and stratified randomized experiments. Our key technical contributions are a novel Bernstein-type concentration inequality for i.i.d. data points as well as a concentration result for Neyman's variance estimator.

Related

  1. Thermodynamic Concentration Inequalities: Controlling Uncertainty in Finite-Time and Small-Sample Thermodynamic Inference
    Rick Bebon, Aljaž Godec
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications
    David M. Ritzwoller, Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh
    Journal of Political Economy MicroeconomicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Concentration inequalities for vector-valued martingales
    Tomas Juškevičius, Matas Šileikis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  4. Majorization, Entropy and Concentration Inequalities for Discrete α-Concave Random Variables
    Abdulmajeed Alqasem, Heshan Aravinda, Arnaud Marsiglietti
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  5. Selective Randomization Inference for Interference
    Takahide Yanagi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{freidling2026randomization,
  title = {{Randomization Inference with Concentration Inequalities}},
  author = {Tobias Freidling},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.18586},
  eprint = {2609.18586},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18586},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Randomization Inference with Concentration Inequalities
AU  - Tobias Freidling
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.18586
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18586
AB  - Randomization or design-based inference is becoming an increasingly popular tool for analysing data from randomized experiments: It does not require modelling assumptions on the distribution of outcomes or covariates, and hypothesis testing and estimation are respectively valid and unbiased in finite samples. Yet, confidence intervals for the sample average treatment effect (SATE) are still constructed via finite-population central limit theorems and their coverage is only asymptotic. In this work, we explore an alternative approach: We use concentration inequalities to construct confidence intervals for the SATE with non-asymptotic guarantees. We develop this approach for the most common experimental designs (Bernoulli trials and completely randomized experiments) and provide Hoeffding and Bernstein-type confidence intervals. Moreover, we extend these results to matched-pair, cluster and stratified randomized experiments. Our key technical contributions are a novel Bernstein-type concentration inequality for i.i.d. data points as well as a concentration result for Neyman's variance estimator.
ER  -