Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgical Endoscopy

Access without excess: a comparison of wound infections with disposable versus hybrid trocars in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs

14 more authors
14 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH USA
  2. 2Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH USA
  3. 3Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
  4. 4Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Toriano, Italy
  5. 5Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  6. 6Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  7. 7Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
  8. 8Department of Surgery, Sharon Regional Medical Center, Sharon, PA USA
  9. 9Colorectal Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
  10. 10Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY USA
  11. 11Department of Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN USA
  12. 12Meharry School of Global Health, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN USA
  13. 13Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
  14. 14Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH USA

Abstract

Introduction: Operating rooms generate 70% of hospital waste. Transitioning from disposable to reusable devices could mitigate surgical waste. Partially reusable, or hybrid, trocars can be used for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), but perceptions of increased infection risk may drive preferences toward disposable trocars. However, no data substantiates this risk. Our analysis of a national hernia outcomes database investigates this presumed association.

Methods: Using the abdominal core health quality collaborative (ACHQC), we identified high-volume inguinal hernia surgeons who used only disposable trocars for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) and hybrid trocars for robotic IHR. These two surgical approaches served as surrogates to evaluate differences between disposable and hybrid trocars. We performed a query of the ACHQC to identify patients who underwent elective MIS IHR with mesh between 2017 and 2023 by one of the previously identified surgeons.

Results: A total of 34,638 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 1191 patients in each group. There was no difference in rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), readmission or reoperation between the two groups. There was a statistically significant higher rate of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the disposable trocar group (5% vs. 2%, p = 0.003). This was driven by a significantly higher rate of hematomas (12% vs 38%, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: This study did not find an increased risk of SSI associated with hybrid trocars compared to disposable trocars for MIS inguinal hernia repairs. To decrease surgical waste, surgeons should consider the use of hybrid trocars for laparoscopic surgery.

Related

  1. Twelve-month outcomes after fixation-free, 3-dimensional, lightweight SWING-Mesh implantation for minimally-invasive inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter prospective observational study
    Mateusz Zamkowski, Maciej Bękarski, Jacek Białecki +21
    Videosurgery and other Miniinvasive TechniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full text1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  2. Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization and minimally invasive multivessel CABG for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Ting Ren, Haoyi Yao, Zhaohui Cheng +3
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. Intra-Patient Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Lid Treatment and Traditional Blepharoplasty: Patient and Surgeon-Reported Outcomes
    A. C. Victoria, R. E. Roth, M. N. Berkowitz +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  4. Research trends in minimally invasive partial splenectomy: a bibliometric mapping review with cross-database comparison
    Wei Tian, Xu Deng, Chunyuan Yang +4
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Cost comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: experience from Nigeria and the United States
    Oluwafemi F. Owagbemi, Temitayo O. Ayantayo, Ugochukwu C. Odekpe +3
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{woo2026access,
  title = {{Access without excess: a comparison of wound infections with disposable versus hybrid trocars in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs}},
  author = {Kimberly P. Woo and Ali Alipouriani and Abby Gross and William C. Bennett and Jenny H. Chang and Alvaro Carvalho and Daphne Remulla and Kayleigh Risser and Nikhila Yerabandi and Li-Ching Huang and Alberto Arezzo and Vittoria Bellato and Myrthe M. Eussen and Maggie Hodges and Sheetal Nijhawan and Marina Yiasemidou and Kimberly S. Miles and Patricia Sylla and Shaneeta M. Johnson and Lucas R. Beffa and Clayton C. Petro and Ajita S. Prabhu and David M. Krpata and Michael J. Rosen and Benjamin T. Miller and SAGES, EAES Sustainability in Surgery Committee},
  journal = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s00464-026-13408-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13408-x},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Access without excess: a comparison of wound infections with disposable versus hybrid trocars in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs
AU  - Kimberly P. Woo
AU  - Ali Alipouriani
AU  - Abby Gross
AU  - William C. Bennett
AU  - Jenny H. Chang
AU  - Alvaro Carvalho
AU  - Daphne Remulla
AU  - Kayleigh Risser
AU  - Nikhila Yerabandi
AU  - Li-Ching Huang
AU  - Alberto Arezzo
AU  - Vittoria Bellato
AU  - Myrthe M. Eussen
AU  - Maggie Hodges
AU  - Sheetal Nijhawan
AU  - Marina Yiasemidou
AU  - Kimberly S. Miles
AU  - Patricia Sylla
AU  - Shaneeta M. Johnson
AU  - Lucas R. Beffa
AU  - Clayton C. Petro
AU  - Ajita S. Prabhu
AU  - David M. Krpata
AU  - Michael J. Rosen
AU  - Benjamin T. Miller
AU  - SAGES, EAES Sustainability in Surgery Committee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Surgical Endoscopy
DO  - 10.1007/s00464-026-13408-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13408-x
AB  - Introduction: Operating rooms generate 70% of hospital waste. Transitioning from disposable to reusable devices could mitigate surgical waste. Partially reusable, or hybrid, trocars can be used for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), but perceptions of increased infection risk may drive preferences toward disposable trocars. However, no data substantiates this risk. Our analysis of a national hernia outcomes database investigates this presumed association.  Methods: Using the abdominal core health quality collaborative (ACHQC), we identified high-volume inguinal hernia surgeons who used only disposable trocars for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) and hybrid trocars for robotic IHR. These two surgical approaches served as surrogates to evaluate differences between disposable and hybrid trocars. We performed a query of the ACHQC to identify patients who underwent elective MIS IHR with mesh between 2017 and 2023 by one of the previously identified surgeons.  Results: A total of 34,638 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 1191 patients in each group. There was no difference in rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), readmission or reoperation between the two groups. There was a statistically significant higher rate of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the disposable trocar group (5% vs. 2%, p = 0.003). This was driven by a significantly higher rate of hematomas (12% vs 38%, p = 0.007).  Conclusion: This study did not find an increased risk of SSI associated with hybrid trocars compared to disposable trocars for MIS inguinal hernia repairs. To decrease surgical waste, surgeons should consider the use of hybrid trocars for laparoscopic surgery.
SN  - 0930-2794
SN  - 1432-2218
ER  -