Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of general internal medicine

Characteristics and Success of Internal Medicine Applicants to Subspecialty Fellowships

6 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  2. 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
  3. 3Department of Medical Education and Office of Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
  4. 4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  5. 5Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  6. 6Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fellowship application process represents a critical step in the pathway to a subspecialty career for internal medicine residents. Understanding applicant factors associated with successful entry into fellowship can inform application strategies and fellowship selection processes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate internal medicine resident applicant factors associated with successful entry into fellowship. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional study of all single-time applicants to the eight largest internal medicine subspecialties from 2008 to 2020 utilizing nationwide data. PARTICIPANTS: Applicants to cardiovascular disease, endocrinology, gastroenterology, hematology/oncology, infectious disease, pulmonary/critical care medicine (PCCM), nephrology, and rheumatology. Applicant characteristics included demographics (age, sex, and underrepresented in medicine [URiM] status), publication count, chief resident status, graduate degree, medical school setting (Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Osteopathy [DO], and International Medical Graduate [IMG]), and residency program setting/size. MAIN MEASURES: Applicants were defined as successful if they applied to fellowship and were subsequently documented as fellows in that subspecialty the next year. KEY RESULTS: Out of 38,179 applicants, 32,091 (84.1%) were successful. In multivariable analysis, the highest publication count (≥ 11) compared to the lowest count (0) was associated with higher likelihood of success (aOR 4.18, 95% CI 3.57-4.90). Groups with lower likelihood of success included older (0.88, 0.88-0.89), female (0.89, 0.83-0.94), URiM (0.84, 0.77-0.93), DO (0.53, 0.47-0.59), and IMG (0.44, 0.41-0.47) applicants, as well as those who attended community-based (0.53, 0.47-0.61) or community-based, university-affiliated residencies (0.65, 0.60-0.71). Female applicants to cardiovascular disease and gastroenterology and URiM applicants to PCCM had lower likelihood of success. CONCLUSIONS: Applicants with higher publication count had a higher likelihood of success, whereas older, female, URiM, DO, and IMG applicants had a lower likelihood. Fellowship programs and their governing bodies should consider the adoption of mission-aligned selection processes to provide more balanced consideration of applicant characteristics.

Related

  1. Interviewing Experience and Program Ratings Among Applicants to Three Community Hospital-Based Family Medicine Residency Programs
    Michael Malone MD, Omar Irfan MD, Salman Muhammad Soomar MSc +5
    Journal of Medical Education and Curricular DevelopmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  2. Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Resident Research Program and Barriers to Research at an Academic Medical Center
    Journal of Brown hospital medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Prevalence and Patterns of Self-Reported Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Among Internal Medicine Outpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study from Türkiye
    Ayşenur Uçar, Mehmet Erdevir, Felemez Arslan
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Back to work MD - Experiences of internal medicine physicians returning to work after parental leave
    S. Hasan, G. H. Tang, T. Van Bakel +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  5. Machine Learning Prediction of 90-Day Readmission and Mortality in General Internal Medicine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Laila Al Wahaibi, Said Al Jaadi, Mohammed Al-Hinai +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026characteristics,
  title = {{Characteristics and Success of Internal Medicine Applicants to Subspecialty Fellowships}},
  author = {Neil S. Zhang and Kyaw Min Tun and Kavita Batra and Jennifer Babik and Laura Huppert and Aditi Singh and Sandhya Wahi-Gururaj and Atif Qasim},
  journal = {Journal of general internal medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1007/s11606-026-10688-w},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10688-w},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Characteristics and Success of Internal Medicine Applicants to Subspecialty Fellowships
AU  - Neil S. Zhang
AU  - Kyaw Min Tun
AU  - Kavita Batra
AU  - Jennifer Babik
AU  - Laura Huppert
AU  - Aditi Singh
AU  - Sandhya Wahi-Gururaj
AU  - Atif Qasim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
JO  - Journal of general internal medicine
DO  - 10.1007/s11606-026-10688-w
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10688-w
AB  - BACKGROUND: The fellowship application process represents a critical step in the pathway to a subspecialty career for internal medicine residents. Understanding applicant factors associated with successful entry into fellowship can inform application strategies and fellowship selection processes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate internal medicine resident applicant factors associated with successful entry into fellowship. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional study of all single-time applicants to the eight largest internal medicine subspecialties from 2008 to 2020 utilizing nationwide data. PARTICIPANTS: Applicants to cardiovascular disease, endocrinology, gastroenterology, hematology/oncology, infectious disease, pulmonary/critical care medicine (PCCM), nephrology, and rheumatology. Applicant characteristics included demographics (age, sex, and underrepresented in medicine [URiM] status), publication count, chief resident status, graduate degree, medical school setting (Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Osteopathy [DO], and International Medical Graduate [IMG]), and residency program setting/size. MAIN MEASURES: Applicants were defined as successful if they applied to fellowship and were subsequently documented as fellows in that subspecialty the next year. KEY RESULTS: Out of 38,179 applicants, 32,091 (84.1%) were successful. In multivariable analysis, the highest publication count (≥ 11) compared to the lowest count (0) was associated with higher likelihood of success (aOR 4.18, 95% CI 3.57-4.90). Groups with lower likelihood of success included older (0.88, 0.88-0.89), female (0.89, 0.83-0.94), URiM (0.84, 0.77-0.93), DO (0.53, 0.47-0.59), and IMG (0.44, 0.41-0.47) applicants, as well as those who attended community-based (0.53, 0.47-0.61) or community-based, university-affiliated residencies (0.65, 0.60-0.71). Female applicants to cardiovascular disease and gastroenterology and URiM applicants to PCCM had lower likelihood of success. CONCLUSIONS: Applicants with higher publication count had a higher likelihood of success, whereas older, female, URiM, DO, and IMG applicants had a lower likelihood. Fellowship programs and their governing bodies should consider the adoption of mission-aligned selection processes to provide more balanced consideration of applicant characteristics.
SN  - 0884-8734
SN  - 1525-1497
ER  -