Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cells

Systematic Characterization of AML Cell Lines to Support Preclinical In Vitro CAR-T Research

  1. 1Center for Precision Genetic Technologies for Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow 125167, Russia
  2. 2National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow 125167, Russia

Abstract

The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains challenging, underscoring the need for reliable preclinical models. Although AML cell lines are widely used in CAR-T studies, their ability to reflect clinically relevant antigen expression patterns and functional characteristics of primary AML cells has not been systematically evaluated. We characterized nine AML cell lines (KG-1, HL-60, Kasumi-1, OCI-AML2, OCI-AML5, THP-1, U-937, MV4-11, and MOLM-13) as targets for in vitro CAR-T studies. We assessed the expression of established CAR-T target antigens (e.g., CLL1, CD33), cell lines similarity to minimal residual disease (MRD) cells and matched healthy monocytes from 161 AML patients, the expression of emerging AML-associated antigens (Siglec-6, CSF1R, and CD70), growth behavior, and susceptibility to non-specific killing by non-transduced T cells. AML cell lines demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in antigen expression with several cell lines showing antigen densities exceeding those observed in AML blasts. Several widely used lines, including U-937, were susceptible to non-transduced T-cell cytotoxicity, potentially confounding CAR-T functional assays and overestimating CAR-T activity in vitro. The examined parameters were integrated into a scoring framework to rank AML cell lines according to their suitability for in vitro CAR-T studies. Based on this framework and additional assay-related considerations, OCI-AML2, OCI-AML5, MV4-11, and MOLM-13 were identified as most suitable for in vitro evaluation of CAR-T products, particularly those targeting CD33 and CLL1. These findings may facilitate more informed selection of AML cell lines for preclinical development of CAR-T therapies for AML.

Related

  1. Lymphocyte-predominant inflammation refines lung histopathology scoring in preclinical respiratory viral infection: support from deep learning analysis
    Sang Hyeok Seok, Hyeon Ah Kim, Hyeok-Won An +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  2. You Are Not Alone: A Medical Student Lead, Near-Peer Program to Support Preclinical Medical Students Remediating Examinations.
    Francisca Kolibar, Mehak Chawla, Gavin Wu +2
    Medical science educatorPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Editorial: Bridging electrophysiological markers from preclinical to clinical neuropsychiatric research
    Hongjian Pu, Miranda F. Koloski
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. CD47–SIRPα as a Therapeutic Target in Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of Expression, Preclinical, and Clinical Evidence
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Tumor immune organoids support preclinical evaluation of cancer immunotherapies through comparative modelling and translational investigation
    Yang Zhang, Zhuo Wang, Yuting Xiu +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{davydova2026systematic,
  title = {{Systematic Characterization of AML Cell Lines to Support Preclinical In Vitro CAR-T Research}},
  author = {Vassa D. Davydova and Anastasia A. Zotova and Nikolay M. Kapranov and Dmitry V. Dianov and Yulia O. Davydova and Tatiana A. Nenasheva and Irina Y. Zaichenko and Sergei D. Losev and Kseniia A. Nikiforova and Irina V. Galtseva and Apollinariya V. Bogolyubova},
  journal = {Cells},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cells15211964},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/15/21/1964},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Systematic Characterization of AML Cell Lines to Support Preclinical In Vitro CAR-T Research
AU  - Vassa D. Davydova
AU  - Anastasia A. Zotova
AU  - Nikolay M. Kapranov
AU  - Dmitry V. Dianov
AU  - Yulia O. Davydova
AU  - Tatiana A. Nenasheva
AU  - Irina Y. Zaichenko
AU  - Sergei D. Losev
AU  - Kseniia A. Nikiforova
AU  - Irina V. Galtseva
AU  - Apollinariya V. Bogolyubova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Cells
DO  - 10.3390/cells15211964
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/15/21/1964
AB  - The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains challenging, underscoring the need for reliable preclinical models. Although AML cell lines are widely used in CAR-T studies, their ability to reflect clinically relevant antigen expression patterns and functional characteristics of primary AML cells has not been systematically evaluated. We characterized nine AML cell lines (KG-1, HL-60, Kasumi-1, OCI-AML2, OCI-AML5, THP-1, U-937, MV4-11, and MOLM-13) as targets for in vitro CAR-T studies. We assessed the expression of established CAR-T target antigens (e.g., CLL1, CD33), cell lines similarity to minimal residual disease (MRD) cells and matched healthy monocytes from 161 AML patients, the expression of emerging AML-associated antigens (Siglec-6, CSF1R, and CD70), growth behavior, and susceptibility to non-specific killing by non-transduced T cells. AML cell lines demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in antigen expression with several cell lines showing antigen densities exceeding those observed in AML blasts. Several widely used lines, including U-937, were susceptible to non-transduced T-cell cytotoxicity, potentially confounding CAR-T functional assays and overestimating CAR-T activity in vitro. The examined parameters were integrated into a scoring framework to rank AML cell lines according to their suitability for in vitro CAR-T studies. Based on this framework and additional assay-related considerations, OCI-AML2, OCI-AML5, MV4-11, and MOLM-13 were identified as most suitable for in vitro evaluation of CAR-T products, particularly those targeting CD33 and CLL1. These findings may facilitate more informed selection of AML cell lines for preclinical development of CAR-T therapies for AML.
SN  - 2073-4409
ER  -