Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings: implications for health inequalities – a systematic scoping review

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing global focus on shifting healthcare provision from hospitals and into community settings, partly with the aim of reducing health inequalities. This study aimed to (i) ascertain which non-emergency hospital-based healthcare services have been shifted to community settings and (ii) to understand the impact of these shifts on health inequalities.

Methods: A systematic scoping review of five databases, alongside extensive hand searching, was conducted. Eligible studies used qualitative or quantitative methods, were peer-reviewed, published in the English-language, from 2015 onwards, and examined any population in high-income countries. After deduplication, one reviewer screened the titles and abstracts, followed by the full texts; a random 10% sample checked by a second reviewer at both stages. Data were extracted from eligible studies, checked for accuracy, charted, and narratively summarised. Reported beneficial outcomes of shifting healthcare provision from hospitals to community settings were mapped onto the Quadruple-Aim framework.

Results: Of the 28 included studies, 9 were from the UK, and 10 focused on long-term condition management services. Reported beneficial outcomes of service shifts included: better overall patient experience than standard hospital-based care ( n = 10), and fewer referrals to hospital-based secondary care ( n = 8). Most ( n = 21) studies did not report service shift drawbacks, limiting scope for a balanced assessment. However, of the 7 that did, one community service found no reduction in secondary care waitlist length, and another reported a higher non-attendance rate in the community setting than hospital-based care. Evidence on health inequalities (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position) was limited: only 7 studies examined variation in outcomes (e.g., access, onward referral, and satisfaction) across population groups. Of these, 4 found no differences, 2 reported better access for some groups, and 1 reported poorer access.

Conclusions: Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings has the potential to improve patients' experiences of care, improve population health, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance the experience of providing care. However, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that these shifts reduces health inequalities. Robust evaluations, including analyses of inequalities in patient outcomes, of services shifted to community settings are warranted.

Related

  1. Trends of delayed healthcare access in ocular injuries: a multicenter study in community hospitals, Central Thailand
    Panrawee Sertsuwankul, Chanapat Limprungpattanakit, Panhathai Yaisiri +2
    International Journal of OphthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Interdisciplinary care models for functional movement disorders: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and implications for integrated healthcare delivery
    Anabel Granja-Dominguez, Juan Máximo Molina-Linde, Patricia García-Sanz +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Challenges of Community Participation in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Reviews
    Muhammad Abuarrah, Fatemeh Khosravi, Mohsen Khosravi
    Journal of Primary Care & Community HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  4. Telemedicine-Enabled Medication Optimization for Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review and Implications for Saudi Vision 2030 Healthcare Transformation.
    Bobakr Bawazir, Yaslam Ba Srada, Saad Mohammad Aghi +5
    Clinics and practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Barriers and facilitators to Medical Emergency Team activation among healthcare professionals: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional survey in four Swiss hospitals
    N. S. Goetz, A. Wolfensberger, R. Ludwig +7
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{sacre2026shifting,
  title = {{Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings: implications for health inequalities – a systematic scoping review}},
  author = {Amber Sacre and Adam Todd and Alisha Gupta and Clare Bambra and Martin Wilson and Anna Robinson-Barella},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29681-3},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-29681-3},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings: implications for health inequalities – a systematic scoping review
AU  - Amber Sacre
AU  - Adam Todd
AU  - Alisha Gupta
AU  - Clare Bambra
AU  - Martin Wilson
AU  - Anna Robinson-Barella
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29681-3
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-29681-3
AB  - Background: There is an increasing global focus on shifting healthcare provision from hospitals and into community settings, partly with the aim of reducing health inequalities. This study aimed to (i) ascertain which non-emergency hospital-based healthcare services have been shifted to community settings and (ii) to understand the impact of these shifts on health inequalities.  Methods: A systematic scoping review of five databases, alongside extensive hand searching, was conducted. Eligible studies used qualitative or quantitative methods, were peer-reviewed, published in the English-language, from 2015 onwards, and examined any population in high-income countries. After deduplication, one reviewer screened the titles and abstracts, followed by the full texts; a random 10% sample checked by a second reviewer at both stages. Data were extracted from eligible studies, checked for accuracy, charted, and narratively summarised. Reported beneficial outcomes of shifting healthcare provision from hospitals to community settings were mapped onto the Quadruple-Aim framework.  Results: Of the 28 included studies, 9 were from the UK, and 10 focused on long-term condition management services. Reported beneficial outcomes of service shifts included: better overall patient experience than standard hospital-based care ( n = 10), and fewer referrals to hospital-based secondary care ( n = 8). Most ( n = 21) studies did not report service shift drawbacks, limiting scope for a balanced assessment. However, of the 7 that did, one community service found no reduction in secondary care waitlist length, and another reported a higher non-attendance rate in the community setting than hospital-based care. Evidence on health inequalities (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position) was limited: only 7 studies examined variation in outcomes (e.g., access, onward referral, and satisfaction) across population groups. Of these, 4 found no differences, 2 reported better access for some groups, and 1 reported poorer access.  Conclusions: Shifting healthcare services from hospitals to community settings has the potential to improve patients' experiences of care, improve population health, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance the experience of providing care. However, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that these shifts reduces health inequalities. Robust evaluations, including analyses of inequalities in patient outcomes, of services shifted to community settings are warranted.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -