Racism as context and resilience as infrastructure: the racism-resilience response framework for equity-focused implementation.
- 1Research & Data Services, University of Cincinnati Libraries, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Abstract
Past and present experiences of racism in minoritized communities shape the environments where health interventions are implemented and create a distinct health infrastructure built from adaptive resilience responses. Implementation science has a unique opportunity to advance health equity by examining the barriers and facilitators that determine implementation success. Yet most implementation frameworks overlook racism mediated resilience, treating racism as a background risk factor rather than a multilevel implementation determinant. They also tend to imply a linear model of implementation, though interventions are introduced into dynamic systems shaped by structural racism, institutional disinvestment, organizational constraint, mistrust, and community-generated resilience. In these settings, implementation is an iterative process shaped by interacting forces across levels and over time. This article brings together evidence on how racism drives health inequities in minoritized communities and on the adaptive strategies communities use to navigate these conditions-such as mutual aid networks, community-based organizations, faith institutions, and trusted messengers. I argue that these resilience systems function as parallel public health infrastructures and that implementation strategies that fail to engage them miss opportunities to increase implementation success and promote health equity. Building on the Health Equity Implementation Framework, Public Health 3.0, and Ellis's Community Resilience model, I propose the Racism-Resilience Response Framework (R3F). This equity-centered implementation framework positions racism and community resilience as multilevel implementation determinants and conceptualizes implementation as a systems-oriented, iterative process rather than a linear one. The R3F outlines a four-step participatory process: 1.) Team formation and framing, 2.) Multilevel assessment and mapping, 3.) Determinant mapping and strategy design, and 4.) Equity-focused evaluation that embeds multisector collaboration and community-generated resilience strategies into implementation planning and delivery. Together, these steps embed multisector collaboration and community-generated resilience strategies into implementation planning and delivery. Although the framework requires empirical testing, it offers implementation scientists a practical approach for confronting racism directly and advancing more equitable, community-grounded implementation practice.
Related
- Three-Phase Framework for Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Identification, Classification, and Risk Interdependencies
- Green infrastructure investment prioritization for urban ecosystem services and resilience: a decision-support framework
- A lightweight closed-loop adaptive intrusion detection framework for cyber resilience in critical infrastructure
- Healthcare Organizational Resilience: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework of Factors, Capabilities, Outcomes, and Context
- Enhancing urban water resilience through green infrastructure in Kathmandu, Nepal
BibTeX
@article{grant2026racism,
title = {{Racism as context and resilience as infrastructure: the racism-resilience response framework for equity-focused implementation.}},
author = {Tiffany J Grant},
journal = {Frontiers in health services},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/frhs.2026.1955240},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948105},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Racism as context and resilience as infrastructure: the racism-resilience response framework for equity-focused implementation.
AU - Tiffany J Grant
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - Frontiers in health services
DO - 10.3389/frhs.2026.1955240
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948105
AB - Past and present experiences of racism in minoritized communities shape the environments where health interventions are implemented and create a distinct health infrastructure built from adaptive resilience responses. Implementation science has a unique opportunity to advance health equity by examining the barriers and facilitators that determine implementation success. Yet most implementation frameworks overlook racism mediated resilience, treating racism as a background risk factor rather than a multilevel implementation determinant. They also tend to imply a linear model of implementation, though interventions are introduced into dynamic systems shaped by structural racism, institutional disinvestment, organizational constraint, mistrust, and community-generated resilience. In these settings, implementation is an iterative process shaped by interacting forces across levels and over time. This article brings together evidence on how racism drives health inequities in minoritized communities and on the adaptive strategies communities use to navigate these conditions-such as mutual aid networks, community-based organizations, faith institutions, and trusted messengers. I argue that these resilience systems function as parallel public health infrastructures and that implementation strategies that fail to engage them miss opportunities to increase implementation success and promote health equity. Building on the Health Equity Implementation Framework, Public Health 3.0, and Ellis's Community Resilience model, I propose the Racism-Resilience Response Framework (R3F). This equity-centered implementation framework positions racism and community resilience as multilevel implementation determinants and conceptualizes implementation as a systems-oriented, iterative process rather than a linear one. The R3F outlines a four-step participatory process: 1.) Team formation and framing, 2.) Multilevel assessment and mapping, 3.) Determinant mapping and strategy design, and 4.) Equity-focused evaluation that embeds multisector collaboration and community-generated resilience strategies into implementation planning and delivery. Together, these steps embed multisector collaboration and community-generated resilience strategies into implementation planning and delivery. Although the framework requires empirical testing, it offers implementation scientists a practical approach for confronting racism directly and advancing more equitable, community-grounded implementation practice.
SN - 2813-0146
ER -