FEED, FLEE, OR FACT-FIND: MODELING LATENT COGNITIVE-MECHANISTIC RESPONSES TO HETEROSPECIFIC ALARM CALLS FOR FORAGING CARDINALS
- 1University of Florida
Abstract
Heterospecific alarm calls allow animals to obtain information about predators from other species, but how receivers translate different forms of alarm information into defensive behavior remains poorly understood. In particular, signals may differ in whether they elicit rapid, relatively stereotyped responses or permit more graded evaluation of threat. We investigated this possibility by exposing foraging Northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) to playbacks of tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) calls associated with different predator contexts, including graded and immediate threats. To characterize responses, we developed a Bayesian latent-risk model that integrated three behaviors: feeding, vigilant looks, and departure, to estimate a shared dimension of perceived predation risk. Inferred risk increased from near-baseline levels under contact calls to intermediate levels under owl-associated call and the highest levels under ZZ calls. Increasing latent risk was associated with reduced expected seed intake and higher probability of complete feeding suppression. Vigilance showed a nonlinear relationship with inferred risk, increasing at intermediate levels before declining under the highest-risk treatment in favor of departure. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that receivers continue gathering information under intermediate threats but reduce vigilance when responding to more urgent danger. Although the experiment cannot fully establish whether these differences arise from canalized defensive responses or flexible cognitive evaluation, the results show how heterospecific alarm calls map onto distinct, coordinated behavioral responses.
Related
- Early Seedling Growth Responses to Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Inoculation in Sugarcane: A Multivariate and Semi-Mechanistic Analysis
- Beyond harm: synthesising meta-analytical and mechanistic evidence on animal responses to microplastics
- Mechanistic modeling of bacterial translation initiation across growth conditions
- Inferior Colliculus, but not Auditory Cortex, is necessary for the discrimination of heterospecific communication sounds in overtrained mice
- MIRCID: Inferred Hub-miRNAs Drive Cross-Task Improvements in Drug Mechanistic Modeling
BibTeX
@misc{martin2026feed,
title = {{FEED, FLEE, OR FACT-FIND: MODELING LATENT COGNITIVE-MECHANISTIC RESPONSES TO HETEROSPECIFIC ALARM CALLS FOR FORAGING CARDINALS}},
author = {N. W. Martin and K. E. Sieving},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.12.758620},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758620v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - FEED, FLEE, OR FACT-FIND: MODELING LATENT COGNITIVE-MECHANISTIC RESPONSES TO HETEROSPECIFIC ALARM CALLS FOR FORAGING CARDINALS
AU - N. W. Martin
AU - K. E. Sieving
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.12.758620
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758620v1
AB - Heterospecific alarm calls allow animals to obtain information about predators from other species, but how receivers translate different forms of alarm information into defensive behavior remains poorly understood. In particular, signals may differ in whether they elicit rapid, relatively stereotyped responses or permit more graded evaluation of threat. We investigated this possibility by exposing foraging Northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) to playbacks of tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) calls associated with different predator contexts, including graded and immediate threats. To characterize responses, we developed a Bayesian latent-risk model that integrated three behaviors: feeding, vigilant looks, and departure, to estimate a shared dimension of perceived predation risk. Inferred risk increased from near-baseline levels under contact calls to intermediate levels under owl-associated call and the highest levels under ZZ calls. Increasing latent risk was associated with reduced expected seed intake and higher probability of complete feeding suppression. Vigilance showed a nonlinear relationship with inferred risk, increasing at intermediate levels before declining under the highest-risk treatment in favor of departure. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that receivers continue gathering information under intermediate threats but reduce vigilance when responding to more urgent danger. Although the experiment cannot fully establish whether these differences arise from canalized defensive responses or flexible cognitive evaluation, the results show how heterospecific alarm calls map onto distinct, coordinated behavioral responses.
ER -