PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
How Close Is Close Enough? Direct Connection and Jurisdiction over Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice
- 1The Scholarly Nexus
Abstract
Chapter 4 of 20 — part of a research treatise in public international law by S.S.Bukhari (The Scholarly Nexus, October 2026), examining ICJ jurisdiction and procedure, expropriation and investment protection, targeted sanctions, the law of the sea, refugee protection, and the formation of customary international law.
Italy's Counterclaim Against Germany Dismissed Ratione Temporis in Jurisdictional Immunities left the direct-connection question unanswered; this article examines the two cumulative conditions and undefined test of Article 80 of the Rules.
Related
- When Computational Fairness Is Not Enough: Explaining the Gap Between Algorithmic Fairness and Organizational Justice from a Business Ethics Perspective
- The Discipline of the Threshold: What May — and May Not — Be Decided at the Jurisdictional Stage before the International Court of Justice
- Is There a Dispute at All? The Existence of a Legal Dispute and the Critical Date before the International Court of Justice
- Must They First Talk? Prior Negotiation as a Condition of Seising the International Court of Justice
- Is the International Normalized Ratio (INR) Enough? Reevaluating INR-Based Decision-Making for Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Geriatric Warfarin-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Cohort Study
BibTeX
@misc{bukhari2026close,
title = {{How Close Is Close Enough? Direct Connection and Jurisdiction over Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice}},
author = {S.S. Bukhari},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23474904},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23474904},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - How Close Is Close Enough? Direct Connection and Jurisdiction over Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice
AU - S.S. Bukhari
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23474904
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23474904
AB - Chapter 4 of 20 — part of a research treatise in public international law by S.S.Bukhari (The Scholarly Nexus, October 2026), examining ICJ jurisdiction and procedure, expropriation and investment protection, targeted sanctions, the law of the sea, refugee protection, and the formation of customary international law. Italy's Counterclaim Against Germany Dismissed Ratione Temporis in Jurisdictional Immunities left the direct-connection question unanswered; this article examines the two cumulative conditions and undefined test of Article 80 of the Rules.
ER -