Phase-sensitive integration of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a scoping review.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Medical Research, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
- 2Department of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
- 3Department of Psychiatry, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
- 4Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi Campus, No.2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi, 613, Taiwan (R.O.C.). [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for anxiety disorders; however, treatment engagement, adherence, and premature dropout remain persistent clinical challenges. Motivational interviewing (MI) has increasingly been integrated with CBT to address ambivalence, enhance treatment readiness, and support treatment engagement across different phases of therapy. This scoping review mapped and synthesized existing models of MI-CBT integration and their reported clinical and methodological characteristics.Methods
This scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2005 and December 2025. Eligible studies examined integrated MI-CBT interventions for anxiety disorders. Data were synthesized descriptively. Based on recurrent implementation patterns identified across the included studies, a preliminary conceptual synthesis was developed to organize MI-CBT integration according to treatment sequencing, phase-specific engagement functions, delivery formats, and implementation characteristics.Results
Nine empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Three broad MI-CBT integration approaches were identified: pretreatment MI, concurrent/embedded MI, and intermittent/responsive MI. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies in treatment sequencing, MI content, dosage, therapist training, fidelity monitoring, and implementation procedures. Across studies, MI was primarily implemented with the reported aim of enhancing and address motivational challenges, with several studies reported improved in treatment readiness, adherence, attendance, therapeutic alliance, and resistance management. Evidence for incremental symptom improvement beyond standard CBT remained inconsistent.Conclusion
Based on recurrent descriptive patterns identified across the included studies, a preliminary conceptual framework was developed to organize the observed MI-CBT integration approaches. The reviewed literature suggests that MI may have potential value for addressing ambivalence, strengthening the therapeutic alliance, managing resistance, and supporting engagement during clinically challenging phases of CBT. However, the current evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous. Future research should evaluate this preliminary conceptual framework across diverse clinical populations and implementation settings while clarifying optimal sequencing strategies, fidelity procedures, dosage parameters, and the role of therapist-supported and asynchronous digital CBT interventions.
Related
- Motivational Interviewing for Pediatric Residents: A Case-Based Workshop on Adolescent Substance Use.
- Effectiveness of a Sequential Simulation and Online Learning Intervention on Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses’ Motivational Interviewing Knowledge, Confidence, and Skill Performance for Medication Adherence: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
- An LLM-based motivational interviewing training system for Japanese clinical education
- The Moderating Effects of Race and Ethnicity on a Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Improving Physical Health Among Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Secondary Analysis of a Pilot Randomized Trial
- Motivational and Consummatory Anhedonia Represent Distinct Affective and Behavioral Responses to Effortful and Rewarding Activities in Daily Life
BibTeX
@article{ho2026phasesensitive,
title = {{Phase-sensitive integration of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a scoping review.}},
author = {Mei-Hsin Ho and Chizimuzo Okoli and Chun-Liong Tung and Rei-Mei Hong},
journal = {BMC psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s12888-026-08445-8},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42963747},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Phase-sensitive integration of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a scoping review.
AU - Mei-Hsin Ho
AU - Chizimuzo Okoli
AU - Chun-Liong Tung
AU - Rei-Mei Hong
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - BMC psychiatry
DO - 10.1186/s12888-026-08445-8
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42963747
AB - Background Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for anxiety disorders; however, treatment engagement, adherence, and premature dropout remain persistent clinical challenges. Motivational interviewing (MI) has increasingly been integrated with CBT to address ambivalence, enhance treatment readiness, and support treatment engagement across different phases of therapy. This scoping review mapped and synthesized existing models of MI-CBT integration and their reported clinical and methodological characteristics.Methods This scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2005 and December 2025. Eligible studies examined integrated MI-CBT interventions for anxiety disorders. Data were synthesized descriptively. Based on recurrent implementation patterns identified across the included studies, a preliminary conceptual synthesis was developed to organize MI-CBT integration according to treatment sequencing, phase-specific engagement functions, delivery formats, and implementation characteristics.Results Nine empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Three broad MI-CBT integration approaches were identified: pretreatment MI, concurrent/embedded MI, and intermittent/responsive MI. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies in treatment sequencing, MI content, dosage, therapist training, fidelity monitoring, and implementation procedures. Across studies, MI was primarily implemented with the reported aim of enhancing and address motivational challenges, with several studies reported improved in treatment readiness, adherence, attendance, therapeutic alliance, and resistance management. Evidence for incremental symptom improvement beyond standard CBT remained inconsistent.Conclusion Based on recurrent descriptive patterns identified across the included studies, a preliminary conceptual framework was developed to organize the observed MI-CBT integration approaches. The reviewed literature suggests that MI may have potential value for addressing ambivalence, strengthening the therapeutic alliance, managing resistance, and supporting engagement during clinically challenging phases of CBT. However, the current evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous. Future research should evaluate this preliminary conceptual framework across diverse clinical populations and implementation settings while clarifying optimal sequencing strategies, fidelity procedures, dosage parameters, and the role of therapist-supported and asynchronous digital CBT interventions.
SN - 1471-244X
ER -