Positional Differences in American Football Players Internal Load and Recovery Over a 10-Week In-Season
Abstract
Internal load metrics may better reflect the increased metabolic demands of American football linemen, not fully appreciated using external load metrics alone. This pilot study served to investigate both (1) internal workload and (2) autonomic nervous system (ANS) recovery using heart rate (HR) metrics in 28 collegiate football players, subdivided into three player position groups: BIG (linemen; n=20), COMBO (quarterbacks, linebackers, and tight ends; n=3), and SKILL (receivers and running backs; n=5) players. HR data were collected using chest-strap monitors (Firstbeat™) worn during the first two practices of each week, over a 10-week season. Internal load was assessed using training impulse (TRIMP) while ANS recovery was measured, pre-practice, using heart rate variability (HRV). Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests were used to compare the overall differences between the three player position groups. For internal load, TRIMP was statistically different between groups, H(2)=23.25, p=0.001. TRIMP values for BIG, COMBO, and SKILL were: 135.0±61.0AU, 123.0±50.8AU, and 101.0±53.1AU. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed the only significant TRIMP difference was between the BIG group and the SKILL group (p=0.001). For ANS recovery metrics, HRV pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between BIG (53.4±25.2ms) and SKILL (72.6±30.5ms) position groups (p=0.001). These data suggest that BIG position group players may experience significantly greater internal loads and demonstrate the least ANS recovery, compared with SKILL players, across midweek practice sessions. These high metabolic loads may help explain why linemen are at greatest risk for heatstroke during practice.
Related
- Peripheral Nerve Conduction and Anthropometric Characteristics in Elite American Football Players: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
- A NATA Task Force: Preventing Exertional Heat Stroke Death in American Football Linemen
- Military History and Post-traumatic Stress in Former American Football Players: Modeling Contributions to Clinical Outcomes
- Multidimensional recovery monitoring in elite female football: an ecological understanding of sleep–recovery relationship
- Repeated Head Impacts May Compromise White Matter Integrity and Bimanual Coordination in American Football Players
BibTeX
@article{smith2026positional,
title = {{Positional Differences in American Football Players Internal Load and Recovery Over a 10-Week In-Season}},
author = {Valerie Smith and Ruben Mendoza and Cody Vargo and Jordan Sabourin and Brian Rider and Jeffery Martin and Whitney Moore and Tamara Hew-Butler},
journal = {International Journal of Strength and Conditioning},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.549},
url = {https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.549},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Positional Differences in American Football Players Internal Load and Recovery Over a 10-Week In-Season
AU - Valerie Smith
AU - Ruben Mendoza
AU - Cody Vargo
AU - Jordan Sabourin
AU - Brian Rider
AU - Jeffery Martin
AU - Whitney Moore
AU - Tamara Hew-Butler
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
DO - 10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.549
UR - https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.549
AB - Internal load metrics may better reflect the increased metabolic demands of American football linemen, not fully appreciated using external load metrics alone. This pilot study served to investigate both (1) internal workload and (2) autonomic nervous system (ANS) recovery using heart rate (HR) metrics in 28 collegiate football players, subdivided into three player position groups: BIG (linemen; n=20), COMBO (quarterbacks, linebackers, and tight ends; n=3), and SKILL (receivers and running backs; n=5) players. HR data were collected using chest-strap monitors (Firstbeat™) worn during the first two practices of each week, over a 10-week season. Internal load was assessed using training impulse (TRIMP) while ANS recovery was measured, pre-practice, using heart rate variability (HRV). Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests were used to compare the overall differences between the three player position groups. For internal load, TRIMP was statistically different between groups, H(2)=23.25, p=0.001. TRIMP values for BIG, COMBO, and SKILL were: 135.0±61.0AU, 123.0±50.8AU, and 101.0±53.1AU. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed the only significant TRIMP difference was between the BIG group and the SKILL group (p=0.001). For ANS recovery metrics, HRV pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between BIG (53.4±25.2ms) and SKILL (72.6±30.5ms) position groups (p=0.001). These data suggest that BIG position group players may experience significantly greater internal loads and demonstrate the least ANS recovery, compared with SKILL players, across midweek practice sessions. These high metabolic loads may help explain why linemen are at greatest risk for heatstroke during practice.
SN - 2634-2235
ER -