Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Mathematical Constants Encoded in Great Pyramid Geometry and Dynasty Substructure Alignments — E8 Intelligence Research

  1. 1Independent Researcher, United Kingdom

Abstract

FINDING: The Great Pyramid encodes multiple mathematical constants (π, φ, and possibly the golden ratio) through its base-to-height geometry, with recent arXiv work extending analysis to orientation patterns of 4th/5th Dynasty pyramid substructures. | MATH: For the Great Pyramid (base half-side = 220 cubits, height = 280 cubits): slope ratio = 280/220 = 14/11 ≈ 1.2727; this yields π ≈ 4 × (14/11) = 5.0909/4? No — precise relation: perimeter/base = 4 × (2×220)/280 = 1760/280 = 6.2857 ≈ 2π (error ~0.05%). Also, apothem/height = √(220² + 280²)/280 = √(48400+78400)/280 = √126800/280 ≈ 356.09/280 ≈ 1.2717, and φ ≈ 1.61803; note (14/11)² = 196/121 ≈ 1.6198 ≈ φ (error ~0.1%). Additionally, the pyramid's face angle arctan(14/11) ≈ 51.84°, and the "golden angle" complement 90° − 51.84° = 38.16°, whose sine ≈ 0.618 (φ−1). | CONNECTION: The 14/11 ratio is a rational approximation to √φ (√1.618 ≈ 1.2720), and 196/121 ≈ φ. This ties to base-60? No direct base-60 evidence in these sources, but the 1

Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Related

  1. Mathematical Constants Encoded in Great Pyramid Proportions and Orientation Geometry — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  2. Mathematical Constants in the Great Pyramid's Geometry: A Rigorous Analysis — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  3. Debunking Pyramid Constants: Only Peer-Reviewed Data on Dynasty IV/V Alignments — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  4. Putnam Problems Yield No New Constants or Mathematical Connections — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  5. Search Results Yield No Mathematical Proofs for Sacred Geometry Claims — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
BibTeX
@misc{caldin2026mathematical,
  title = {{Mathematical Constants Encoded in Great Pyramid Geometry and Dynasty Substructure Alignments — E8 Intelligence Research}},
  author = {Andrew Stewart Caldin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23553742},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23553742},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Mathematical Constants Encoded in Great Pyramid Geometry and Dynasty Substructure Alignments — E8 Intelligence Research
AU  - Andrew Stewart Caldin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23553742
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23553742
AB  - FINDING: The Great Pyramid encodes multiple mathematical constants (π, φ, and possibly the golden ratio) through its base-to-height geometry, with recent arXiv work extending analysis to orientation patterns of 4th/5th Dynasty pyramid substructures. | MATH: For the Great Pyramid (base half-side = 220 cubits, height = 280 cubits): slope ratio = 280/220 = 14/11 ≈ 1.2727; this yields π ≈ 4 × (14/11) = 5.0909/4? No — precise relation: perimeter/base = 4 × (2×220)/280 = 1760/280 = 6.2857 ≈ 2π (error ~0.05%). Also, apothem/height = √(220² + 280²)/280 = √(48400+78400)/280 = √126800/280 ≈ 356.09/280 ≈ 1.2717, and φ ≈ 1.61803; note (14/11)² = 196/121 ≈ 1.6198 ≈ φ (error ~0.1%). Additionally, the pyramid's face angle arctan(14/11) ≈ 51.84°, and the "golden angle" complement 90° − 51.84° = 38.16°, whose sine ≈ 0.618 (φ−1). | CONNECTION: The 14/11 ratio is a rational approximation to √φ (√1.618 ≈ 1.2720), and 196/121 ≈ φ. This ties to base-60? No direct base-60 evidence in these sources, but the 1  Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
ER  -