Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Design-based effect sizes and their synthesis in randomized multiple-baseline experiments

Abstract

Effect sizes for single-case experimental designs usually rely on models for the baseline trend and the serial dependence, which are challenging to check with few sessions. We develop design-based effect sizes for multiple-baseline experiments with a randomized intervention onset. We define case-level and pooled standardized effects with potential outcomes and propose weighted estimators that are unbiased or asymptotically unbiased without an outcome model. The usual difference between phase means is generally biased when the untreated outcome changes over sessions. For research synthesis, we provide variance estimators and asymptotic confidence intervals that require no model for serial dependence, and variance formulas for planning. Simulations and three randomized studies of reading and writing interventions illustrate the methods.

Related

  1. The promises of multiple experiments: identifying joint distribution of potential outcomes
    Peng Wu, Xiaojie Mao
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text14 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  2. Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with many covariates
    Harold D. Chiang, Yukitoshi Matsushita, Taisuke Otsu
    Journal of EconometricsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated13 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances
    Yuehao Bai, Azeem M. Shaikh, Max Tabord‐Meehan
    Journal of Political Economy MicroeconomicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text12 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. Fisher's Ideas and the Design of Field Experiments in Agronomy and Plant Breeding
    Hans‐Peter Piepho
    Biometrical journal. Biometrische ZeitschriftPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsEurope PMC
  5. Design-Based Confidence Sequences: A General Approach to Risk Mitigation in Panel Experiments
    Dae Woong Ham, Michael Lindon, Martin P. Tingley +1
    Management SciencePeer-reviewedLicence not stated19 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026designbased,
  title = {{Design-based effect sizes and their synthesis in randomized multiple-baseline experiments}},
  author = {Xinyuan Chen and Zhigao Liang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13001},
  eprint = {2610.13001},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13001},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Design-based effect sizes and their synthesis in randomized multiple-baseline experiments
AU  - Xinyuan Chen
AU  - Zhigao Liang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13001
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13001
AB  - Effect sizes for single-case experimental designs usually rely on models for the baseline trend and the serial dependence, which are challenging to check with few sessions. We develop design-based effect sizes for multiple-baseline experiments with a randomized intervention onset. We define case-level and pooled standardized effects with potential outcomes and propose weighted estimators that are unbiased or asymptotically unbiased without an outcome model. The usual difference between phase means is generally biased when the untreated outcome changes over sessions. For research synthesis, we provide variance estimators and asymptotic confidence intervals that require no model for serial dependence, and variance formulas for planning. Simulations and three randomized studies of reading and writing interventions illustrate the methods.
ER  -